The Pros And Cons Of Osama Bin Laden

780 Words4 Pages

After September 11, 2001, Osama Bin Laden’s name was spread worldwide like a deadly disease. Bin Laden, leader of the Islamic extremist group al-Qaeda, organized and hijacked four planes destined for the US. Over 3,000 lives were taken, during a terrorist attack when 19 of the group’s militants bombed the Pentagon and World Trade Center in New York City. Approximately 400 of this number police officers or firefighters, and an additional 10,000 injuries occurred, many severe. On May 1, 2011, when Bin Laden was shot and killed, the question arose: which devastated the United States more, the 9/11 attack or the decade long, costly search for their terrorist? The terrorists, Islamic from Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations, were financed by …show more content…

Total and ultimate safety requires no freedom. Despite these changes, according to the Breakthrough Institute, the decreased privacy of the act has only foiled two plots on the United States. However, a number of attacks have been prevented through “old-fashioned” methods of undercover agents or foreign agency tips. From 2002 until 2012, the estimated homeland security spending of the USA was $690 billion, and $100 billion for the cost of airport delays. $443.5 billion was spent for operations in Afghanistan, where over 1,500 lives were lost and more than 15,000 injured. When a city needs a new bridge, a budget is planned and followed, however the reckless spending for this terrorist brought over $1 trillion in debt. During the Taliban’s reign in Afghanistan, the Al-Qaeda set up camps in the country, with Bin Laden staying as a guest since 1996. Despite pressure to hand over the leader and expel the group, Afghans declined the request, requiring proof, but asked them to leave the country. On October 7, 2011 the USA organized a night bombing attack and began the

More about The Pros And Cons Of Osama Bin Laden