The Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide

571 Words3 Pages

Physician assisted suicide is a moral issue the country has been debating about for a very long time. Sources conflict with each other about when the start of the debating rose to attention, but Jack Kevorkian was a huge impact to the cause. Along with the Hemlock Society, both worked to provide patients, that are considered terminally ill, the care they asked for, which was death.
The states that allow physician assisted suicide, or the Death with Dignity laws/End of Life Action Acts/, are Oregon (1994), Washington (2008), Montana (2009), Vermont (2013), California (2015), Colorado (2016), and Washington D.C. (2016). There are many regulations and rules that the patients have to participate and meet the criteria for to even be considered for assisted suicide. Even through all these hardships, the patients are still undergoing a terrible disease that, for all states (except Montana), has to be a determined death within 6 months. The patients only wish to for someone to alleviate them of the pain and suffering they going through. …show more content…

There are only two differences between the two. The first being that assisted suicide is injected into a terminally ill person and life support removal is a mask or tube being removed so a person can naturally die. The second difference, assisted suicide is legal in 6 states (and D.C.), while life support removal is legal in every state. That is completely unjust, and violates one’s constitutional right because the person who is having the life support tube/mask removed may want to still keep living, but because they are unable to speak or communicate it is assumed, by love ones, that it would be the choice they wanted to make (if they were able to say so); unlike assisted suicide, where the patient is physically and mentally asking for the suffering they are going through to