Opponents may argue that, the need for these advances for protection against foreign enemies or nations is vital. If enemy nations strike, we must strike back; this is not wrong for it is not preemptive war, it is to defend our own, but how can we win if we do not prepare? There are no rules to war; we must simply fight to defend what is ours. Admittedly, preparation is vital, but what opponents fail to take into account is that there is always an alternative. Opponents fail to see that to defend our own and hurt our enemy, we are hurting our own, and dehumanizing them. In many psychological experiments, the government or experimenters have included altering the DNA to achieve their psychological warfare goals, and according to Michael Snyder …show more content…
While Roger Pitman, professor of psychiatry at Harvard University is experimenting with propranolol which is a beta blocker that is believed to erase “terrifying memories”, soldiers are subjected to more research while serving to alleviate the psychological effects of war …show more content…
To further explain the dangers of these demands Hanlon explains that every negative human notion is there for a reason, because without them we would no longer be human. So, at what cost are we defending our nation? At the cost of our own people! As stated by Moreno, do we really want veterans who return without guilt, cold as ice? Psychological warfare is not necessarily aimed at the enemy as it was back when the CIA had project MK Ultra, a program to control the minds of their enemies, but now it is aimed at the soldiers who are told they are fighting to protect our nation. Families of soldiers who die in battle suffer, but they will suffer just the same if the person who returns to them is just a shell; no feelings whatsoever? "Capture their minds and their hearts and souls will follow." Although these new soldiers might not suffer, families will, and society will see an extreme negative impact due to these monstrous advancements, as explained by Patrick Lin of The