ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of US Invasion Tactics

756 Words4 Pages

WWII was the bloodiest conflict in human history, but some would say that the U.S invasion tactics were too far or just necessary. In my opinion I feel that you have to show dominance to others for them to see that you mean business, but I don’t agree with the pulverizing innocent civilians to their deaths. Although the necessity of a US invasion was debated within the US military (US Army was for, US Navy was against) the general consensus judging by the Battle of Iwo Jima and Battle of Okinawa is that an invasion of the Japanese home islands would be costly. With a deterrent to the USSR, the Soviets invaded Manchuria on August 9, 1945 only 3 days after the Hiroshima bombing and 9 hours before the Nagasaki bombing. The US were aware that the USSR would enter the Pacific War on 9 August because at the Yalta Conference …show more content…

The Allies could've made clear that the Japanese imperial family could retain power in post-war. The Japanese military fought on despite the hopeless situation for the honor of defending the emperor. Even after the atomic bombings, Emperor Hirohito told Prince Asaka that he was determined to continue the war if the sovereignty of the Japanese imperial family could not be preserved. Wouldn't it have been better to discuss the imperial family's post-war immunity before using nukes. The main argument for using nukes at the time was to bring complete unconditional surrender. Was this achieved when Japan requested the imperial family be retained? MacArthur granted the request and protected the imperial family from all post-war prosecution. Although Japan's surrender was presented to be unconditional, it was technically a conditional surrender. Couldn't a Japanese conditional surrender been achieved without the use of nukes? After all, Japan was willing to end the war but unwilling to accept unconditional

Show More
Related

Prompt And Utter Destruction Summary

1394 Words | 6 Pages

Name: Course Instructor: Class: Date: Critical Book Review: Prompt and Utter Destruction Introduction Within weeks, word on the US dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki began to spread that the main reason behind the bombs was to save the lives of Americans (Bernard). It was put that hundreds of thousands of American military causalities were saved through the bombings.

Read More

Truman Bombing Dbq

148 Words | 1 Pages

The U.S. viewed bombings as a necessity because Truman gave the Japanese a chance to surrender when he issued the Potsdam Declaration. In his message, Truman warned the Japanese that if they would not unconditionally surrender that they would be struck with “prompt and utter destruction.” Similarly, by bombing the Japanese it would spare up to 1 million American lives along with 250,000 British casualties because U.S and allied soldiers didn’t have to attempt to invade the heavily guarded Japanese territories. Another reason the United States needed to bomb Japan was dominance. The secretary of state thought it would put the U.S. in a dominant position in the postwar and have power over the Germans.

Read More

Why Did The Us Lose Ww2 Essay

478 Words | 2 Pages

What the US did to Japan at the end of World War 2 was unacceptable. Japan was already exhausted by the time the bombs were dropped. Their resources and their army had been worn out. The United States and Britain had just finished fighting Germany and the Soviet Union was ready to join in as well. They could all turn their full attention to defeating Japan and win the war.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

882 Words | 4 Pages

Afterwards, the United States declared war on Japan, and joined allies against the axis powers. The United States’ use of the atomic bombs is justified because it saved American lives; Japan was given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S. The atomic bombs on Japan saved many American lives. Document 15 reads: The entire population of Japan is

Read More

Drop The Bomb Dbq

345 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore knowing how the Japanese soldiers think about surrendering, the millions of lives saved by ending the war quickly and shortly, and the countless warnings given to the Japanese, I think dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was warranted and

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

676 Words | 3 Pages

Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bombs

504 Words | 3 Pages

It could roughly save 30 million people Ground invasions Dropping the Bombs The decision to use the Atomic Bomb affected the way individuals like Truman perceived the war. Even though Harry Truman’s decision affected the way the war turned he did think of how the bomb will affect Japan and its civilians. Which made me think that he did create a way to stop the war which is why, I would also believe in dropping the bombs. President Truman had three options which did make him perceive the way he will fight, 1 to continue bombing Japanese cities, 2 to invade Japan, and 3 demonstrate the bomb on an unpopulated island or an inhabited Japanese city.

Read More

Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

852 Words | 4 Pages

Japan had to accept unconditional surrender; if they disagreed with that request, America would drop the bomb. What made the Japanese surrender was the retention of their emperor; anything else couldn’t have forced a Japanese surrender, including the attack of the atomic bomb. As Japan's Prime Minister Suzuki spelled out on June 9, 1945. “Should the Emperor system be abolished, they [the Japanese people] would lose all reason for existence…. [and have] no choice but to go on fighting to the last man” (Butow).

Read More

Should The Allies Use Atomic Bombs Necessary?

555 Words | 3 Pages

Opponents presented numerous arguments against the utilization of atomic bombs. Critics argued that the use of the atomic bombs was unnecessary due to the fact that the Japanese began seeking surrender terms in April 1945. The Allies were demanding terms of unconditional surrender, which concerned that Japanese. The Japanese were ready to surrender and their only reservation was the preservation of their imperial system. The Japanese sought assurances that their emperor would not be tried as a war criminal.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Chilling Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

646 Words | 3 Pages

Perhaps if we had just let Japan keep its figurehead, we could have solved the war with fewer civilian causalities. However, According to the National WW2 Museum, US leaders believed that “The “retentionists” insisted that promising Hirohito’s continued status as emperor was both essential to obtain the surrender of Japan and to secure compliance with that surrender by Japan’s armed forces.” This would align with Herbert’s belief that there could be no other way and an unconditional surrender was necessary, and not using the nukes would be the only way to end the war swiftly. In the end, America won an unconditional victory, and Japan lost its

Read More

Why Was Hiroshima Justified

1840 Words | 8 Pages

If Japan agreed to the declaration, America would not drop the atomic bomb and Japan would

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Dropping The Atomic Bomb

863 Words | 4 Pages

However, the Japanese were committed to fight to the bitter end of the war and see it all the way through, regardless of the fact that the United States demanded unconditional surrender from the small country of islands. This further emphasizes that since the Japanese were not simply going to give up, Truman came to the conclusion that in order to save millions of lives, he had to take thousands. President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb on Japan to warn the world about the new found power of the United States, force an unconditional surrender of the Japanese, and save millions of lives. With the controversy over whether or not Truman should have dropped the bomb, some consider the decision irrational and unnecessary.

Read More

Was The Cold War Justified

179 Words | 1 Pages

They felt that it would end the war a lot faster. The were to reduce the need of an invasion. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were partially justified because they did prevent the use of nuclear weapons in the Cold War, however, the death toll was unnecessary, and Japan was already defeated .

Read More

The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman and his associates believed that if they dropped the bomb they would receive surrender from Japan. Thus, saving millions of American lives, and ending the war. Nevertheless, by saving American lives they would sacrifice thousands of Japanese civilians. They had other idea to have Japan to surrender, but were willing to take the one that would have the most consequences. They were thinking too much about the US instead of creating actually peace within the nations.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Persuasive Speech

654 Words | 3 Pages

So many more people would have died because of that. So the bombs were pretty useful to stop the war even though many people sadly perished. As well as not dropping the bomb, I think they didn’t have to kill as many people as they did. Japan was already a beaten nation at the time! So why use the bombs to kill so many thousands of helpless Japanese in this inhuman way.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of US Invasion Tactics

Related Topics

Open Document