ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Chilling Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

646 Words3 Pages

The chilling bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a hotly debated subject for many in the US because of the devastation they left behind. Two contrasting beliefs arose during the debate: Gar Alperovitz and Herbert Feis, where two historians argued for the opposing sides. Gar Alperoviz argued that there was no justification for killing the lives of pedestrians, and Herbert feis disagreed, saying that it was unavoidable and ended up saving more lives than it ended. Though both sides make pretty solid points, Gar Alperoviz’s argument is more morally and legally sensible. Alperov was a historian, economist, and a founder of the Harvard institute. He believed that the murdering civilians with the Booming could never be justified. “for even if …show more content…

He believed that the nuclear bombing of Japan was unavoidable and ended us saving millions more lives than if they had not dropped it. He is quoted saying in his books Japin subdued that “ Their thoughts about its employment were governed by one reason which was deemed imperative: that by using the bomb, the agony of war might be ended more quickly. “ (Japan Subdued) The point that booth Historians make about the decrease in death’s (specifically American’s) is supported by general Duglus Micarther who predicted, “U.S. casualties of up to 1 million.” (History) which would be a massive loss. But still, the people dying would at least not have been unprotected …show more content…

Perhaps if we had just let Japan keep its figurehead, we could have solved the war with fewer civilian causalities. However, According to the National WW2 Museum, US leaders believed that “The “retentionists” insisted that promising Hirohito’s continued status as emperor was both essential to obtain the surrender of Japan and to secure compliance with that surrender by Japan’s armed forces.” This would align with Herbert’s belief that there could be no other way and an unconditional surrender was necessary, and not using the nukes would be the only way to end the war swiftly. In the end, America won an unconditional victory, and Japan lost its

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of Truman And The Use Of Atomic Bombs

642 Words | 3 Pages

But he had no compelling reason to do so. The bomb provided a promising way to bring about a prompt Japanese surrender without the disadvantages of other alternatives, and in Truman’s mind, its use did not require a lengthy consideration” (Walker pg. 96). After the bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, people decided that the bombs were actually required. The people thought that if the bombs weren’t dropped, thousands of American lives would have died while America invaded Japan. The problem with this logic is that many people died in those bombings.

Read More

Do You Think That The Fact That Nathaniel Bacon Was Related To Berkeley's Wife

1872 Words | 8 Pages

Also, the militia units risked attacking innocent people by not investigating if the claims of innocence were actually true. In fact, even Governor Berkeley said that they should not have been killed even if they weren’t innocent, since they came

Read More

Hiroshima Vs Nagasaki Dbq

184 Words | 1 Pages

In the United States, it is often taught that the use of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the deciding factor for the Japanese to surrender during World War II. However, upon closer inspection that may not be the reason why. For example, by the time both cities were destroyed Japan had already lost dozens of cities to American fire bombs and conventional raids. As a result, the only difference between the cities that were previously burned and Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the type of weapon used. Therefore,the Japanese government was aware and accustomed to loosing cities and large number of civilian lives.

Read More

1945 Dbq Essay

791 Words | 4 Pages

The doubts about the U.S. decision in 1945 have been discussed, analyzed, and there are still many controversies. In August 1945, the U.S. decided to use both of its two atomic bombs on Japan to end the war between them during WWII. The atomic bomb has killed about 200,000 people in the Japanese community and brought destruction to the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even though the bomb had terminated the war by Japan surrendering, there were many who were against the action of using the bomb. The reason behind that perspective is that many innocent people have died, and Japan was near surrendering, so there was no need for a major event.

Read More

Dbq Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

642 Words | 3 Pages

In late July of 1945 at the Potsdam Conference, the Allied leaders gave the Japanese a chance to surrender, and they totally rejected it (Doc. 1). After the American invasion of Iwo Jima, the Japanese defenders felt discouraged and defeated, as well as desperate to do whatever it took to win (Doc. D). So, by dropping the bomb and ending the war quickly, the opportunity for the Japanese to brutally attack the U.S in a desperate scramble to win was eliminated. Although Japan would need to use money to rebuild the destroyed areas, ending the war saved both sides from spending even more trying to clutch the victory, as the United States alone spent over 4 trillion dollars on the war (Harrington, John and Suneson, Grant.). In all, both sides were relieved by dropping the atomic bomb and ending the war more

Read More

Why We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq

985 Words | 4 Pages

So, Truman made the difficult but necessary decision to drop the first atomic bombs. The mass destruction caused the Japanese to realize that they had already lost the war, and they needed to give up. All in all, the action taken by President Harry S. Truman was the right decision because it ended the war and saved American soldiers’

Read More

Dbq Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

517 Words | 3 Pages

The deployment of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by President Truman during WWII is a contentious issue still debated today. With an aim to achieve victory over Japan without any further loss of life or military resources, some say that his decision was logical and ultimately successful in accomplishing national goals. However, others regard this act as immoral claiming that such violence could never be justifiable under any circumstance. In support of dropping the atomic bomb, proponents asserted that it was crucial to quickly end the war and avoid further loss of American lives. According to Document 3, Secretary Stimson believed that deploying the bomb was crucial to quickly end the conflict and avoid a land invasion of Japan, which would have caused more American lives to be lost.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

872 Words | 4 Pages

It was a malicious and barbaric attack no matter how they try to justify

Read More

Compare And Contrast Why The USould Not Have Bombed Hiroshima And Nagasaki

740 Words | 3 Pages

Step into Hiroshima history, where the atomic bomb not only ended World War II but sparked a heated debate. Were the Americans justified in bombing Hiroshima? Is the question that still lingers to this day. The Americans were not justified in bombing Hiroshima, what did they get out of it, and what events did it cause to change the world? The United States of America was not just in the bombing of Hiroshima in a variety of ways.

Read More

Roger Williams Banishment

1852 Words | 8 Pages

While such claims would have worked as a manner of deterrence

Read More

Analysis Of The Lay Of The Were Wolf

522 Words | 3 Pages

The Lay of the Were Wolf is a French-language medieval poem that tells the story of a werewolf and its life and struggles. The poem details how this creature must live in two worlds: one as human, living in town with other villagers; and one as wolf, alone on the hillsides at night. At first glance it could appear to be simply an entertaining narrative about humans transformed into wolves – however there are moral lessons within this tale worth exploring. When you first read the lay of the werewolf the turning point of the story occurs when the wife betrays him by not only cheating on him with another knight but also telling the night where her husband's clothes were to turn him into a werewolf forever, The text clearly states (De France

Read More

The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman was treating people even worst by putting them through the torture of the bomb and the resulting effects of the bomb. Time became a major factor into the decision, and dropping the bomb was a result of that fear. On the other side of the argument, the Japanese did bomb Pearl Harbor which was the catalyst that got America involved in the first place. We as a country should not need to compromise with the nation who started the battle.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: America's War Crimes

1018 Words | 5 Pages

Also a nuclear bomb on a target as weak as Japan makes no logical sense, meaning the bombing was unjustifiable due to it being

Read More

The Bombings On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

252 Words | 2 Pages

The Bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki took place on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The bombings were approved by The Interim Committee, The Target Committee, President Truman, and Stalin. The preparations for the bombings start on July 16th,1945 with the successful testing of the “Gadget” (Foundation)during the Trinity test. Throughout the months leading up to the bombings the development of the bombs was taking place. After Months of deciding the targets and creating the bombs, it was finally time to drop them.

Read More

Essay On The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

934 Words | 4 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bombs on World War II on the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a very important part of World War II. The atomic bomb ended the war between America and Japan. This was just one of the important events during the battle in World War II. The Battle at Pearl Harbor, where the Japanese attacked U.S. soil was also why the americans bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Some believe that the United States was correct in dropping these bombs on Japan because of the attack on Pearl Harbor while others believe that it was very wrong to dropped the bomb.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Chilling Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

Related Topics

Open Document