ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Why The USould Not Have Bombed Hiroshima And Nagasaki

740 Words3 Pages

Step into Hiroshima history, where the atomic bomb not only ended World War II but sparked a heated debate. Were the Americans justified in bombing Hiroshima? Is the question that still lingers to this day. The Americans were not justified in bombing Hiroshima, what did they get out of it, and what events did it cause to change the world? The United States of America was not just in the bombing of Hiroshima in a variety of ways. In the article “Why America Should Not Have Bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki” Derek talks about how this goes against the Christian faith and it was just pure evil to do the things the U.S. did. In Christian theology, this institution is rooted in the “Pauline principle” that we must not do evil so that good night results” (Woodard-Lehman). This …show more content…

“Before it ended, something dramatic occurred that would change the way nations dealt with each other - perhaps for all of time” (Capio). This specific quote from “The Atomic Bombings of Japan” shows that the U.S. changed the way wars would be fought for the rest of time “Nuclear Warfare” no one wants to have nuclear warfare going on in the World. It would be the end of humanity. Consequently, since the U.S. bombed Hiroshima, we have to live in the fear of nuclear warfare and the human race ending. For these reasons and all the evidence, the U.S. was not justified in bombing Hiroshima. The bombing of Hiroshima had impacted the physical and mental states of survivors, and the ones who sadly passed away. What the U.S. did not realize when bombing Hiroshima is the effect it would have on all these innocent, helpless people. “In Hiroshima alone some 75,000 souls were obliterated instantly, with many more deaths in the following months and years” (Sandberg and Moynihan). All these souls were taken away from the earth and the U.S. did not even care a bit, they just went on as

Show More
Related

Was Truman Justified Dbq Research Paper

636 Words | 3 Pages

On August 6, 1945, the U.S. made history with a fatal blow to the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that ended WWII. To this day there is a controversy on whether the dropping of the atomic bomb, ordered by President Harry S. Truman, was justified or not, but in fact, it was. Thousands of Japanese would perish, but this act would, in turn, saved American lives and end the war. Throughout various battles, the Japanese consistently crossed lines of ethics of warfare, and in an attempt to bring justice and an end to the war Truman put forth a plan to bomb Japan. President Truman warned Japan of the upcoming attack and gave demands, but in the end, the Japanese denied those negotiations which led to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Read More

Potsdam Declaration Dbq

227 Words | 1 Pages

As the Japanese forces were considered the aggressors of the conflict by the Allies and Japanese veterans alike, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Their aggression previous to the bombing was demonstrated through the attack on Pearl Harbour, which led to America’s involvement in World War II. The attack was not one born out of vengeance and was not strategically logical, whereas there was a reason behind the bombing of Hiroshima, that reason being that the Japanese military would not agree to the clauses presented in the Potsdam Declaration. This declaration was given to the military officials as an invitation to surrender before the first bombing, providing ample time for them to make a decision to hopefully end the

Read More

Was Hiroshima Justified Dbq Essay

697 Words | 3 Pages

Also, a lot of people died in both the bombing of NAgasaki and Hiroshima. A chart shows that 135,000 people either died or were injured somehow, and at Nagasaki 64,000 people were killed or injured, proving that there is no way every single one of those people hurt were military. Therefore, the bomb was an awful solution to an almost solved

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Japan

109 Words | 1 Pages

I believe that the bombing of Japan was an over the top choice by the Americans. This way of bombing the Japanese was very inhumane, and left thousands dead. The A-bomb was extremely inhumane, there were a number of other options that the americans could have used, instead of bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Some might think that the A-bomb saved america, but it destroyed Japan. They didn’t realize how much the A-bomb would affect the people and the whole country of Japan, the 20,000 kilojoule bomb killed 140,000 people within the months that followed.

Read More

1945 Dbq Essay

791 Words | 4 Pages

The doubts about the U.S. decision in 1945 have been discussed, analyzed, and there are still many controversies. In August 1945, the U.S. decided to use both of its two atomic bombs on Japan to end the war between them during WWII. The atomic bomb has killed about 200,000 people in the Japanese community and brought destruction to the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even though the bomb had terminated the war by Japan surrendering, there were many who were against the action of using the bomb. The reason behind that perspective is that many innocent people have died, and Japan was near surrendering, so there was no need for a major event.

Read More

Should The Us Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq

616 Words | 3 Pages

If the U.S. did not use the atomic bomb, the war could have killed more American soldiers because Japanese soldiers fought to the death. “The U.S. had sustained more than 75,000 casualties.” (Historical Background). The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was just retaliation for Japan's bombing of Pearl Harbor. The bombing was not really about saving lives.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima

543 Words | 3 Pages

To start it off, one of the positive outcomes of the bombing of Hiroshima is that it led to the ending of the war in the Pacific. The war had already a four-year duration and had ensured that victory for the U.S. would be very costly. This would mean that not only would the U.S. lose a lot of money,

Read More

Three Narratives Of Our Humanity By John W.

1403 Words | 6 Pages

The use of the atomic bomb when strategically compared to a land invasion, in fact prevented the loss of any U.S. soldiers lives, as well as the death of many Japanese citizens. Excerpts from “Three Narratives of our Humanity” by John W, debates whether or not the nuclear bombing was necessary to shock the Japanese into surrender and describes how the Japanese recall the war through a lens of their own victimization. An excerpt claims, “it is argued that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to shock the Japanese to surrender”. This presents a compelling argument supporting the ethicality of the bombings through its logical and strategic worth.

Read More

Dbq Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

517 Words | 3 Pages

Moreover, as document 6 indicates through a letter from a soldier who fought in the Pacific, many believed that deploying the bomb saved countless American lives and facilitated an end to World War II. According to various arguments put up by supporters of the bombing, it can be inferred that the usage of atomic bombs was an essential and justified action. The belief is that Japan would have prolonged the war further, potentially costing many more lives. Additionally, the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki made Japan sorry for initiating conflict, and eventually led to

Read More

How Is Hiroshima Bombing Justified

1232 Words | 5 Pages

Again, the Japanese had no knowledge of the bombs, causing even more devastating casualties. People have argued over the years if the atomic bombing was justified or not, and multiple points can be made on both arguments, yet I take it that the bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified. Keep in

Read More

Nuclear Warfare Dbq

1345 Words | 6 Pages

If people look back into history to the bombing of Japan on August 6, 1945, that killed around 129,000-226,000 people. Thinking that the United States killed that many men, women, and children Japan would have declared an all-out war against the United States. As bad as the effects were on Hiroshima only a few days later the United States dropped another bomb on Nagasaki that left about 80,000 dead and wounded. Even though, those were the only 2 nuclear bombs used ever, but it did indeed deter from World War II because Japan surrendered, but if the Empire of Japan did not surrender the Allied Forces were going to invade the main land of Japan and history states that would be the bloodiest battle ever written in history. On an island around 460 miles 38,000 allied forces were killed or missing and around 107,000 Japanese were killed.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

657 Words | 3 Pages

On August 6 1945 the first atomic bomb, Little Boy, was dropped on Hiroshima. Now many people including historians look back at that moment and say it was not necessary. In recent weeks, tensions between The United States and Japan rose due to President Obama’s trip to Japan where he did not apologize for the United States bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Contrary to popular belief, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was necessary because it saved the lives of millions of people, destroyed important military factories and ports and made the Japanese surrender and end the war.

Read More

Hiroshima Bombing Argumentative Essay

797 Words | 4 Pages

The atomic bomb was a terrible thing. It killed 150,000 in Hiroshima and 75,000 in Nagasaki, plus many survivors became horribly disfigured from the intensive heat, and death from radiation is uncertain it may not kill the victims for days, weeks, months, or even years. (Although the bomb did save the USA from sending foot soldier to Japan, the Japanese were ready to surrender on terms that they can keep their empire and we had no need to use it). Japan was the first to feel the destructive power of the atomic bomb. Killing a quarter of a million people and costing two billion dollars of war replenish.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

882 Words | 4 Pages

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is one of the most controversial events that came out of world war two. This event of speculation should not be, simply because as a modern day society we can not fairly evaluate the situation as if we were there. Though killing many innocent lives the bomb ultimately stopped the war that would have ended even more lives. The bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki should have been dropped because the bombing of these cities caused the political and militaristic changes and because of these changes, the United States benefited greatly. At the end of the war, devastating bombs were dropped on the two unsuspecting cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb

879 Words | 4 Pages

Lives were lost; families were broken. The entire city was in complete ruins (if you could even consider it a city anymore) (Hayashi, Shigeo). The atomic bomb not only changed lives and the war, but it changed the war. From an ethical stand point, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was not

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Why The USould Not Have Bombed Hiroshima And Nagasaki

Open Document