ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Why The USould Not Have Bombed Hiroshima And Nagasaki

740 Words3 Pages

Step into Hiroshima history, where the atomic bomb not only ended World War II but sparked a heated debate. Were the Americans justified in bombing Hiroshima? Is the question that still lingers to this day. The Americans were not justified in bombing Hiroshima, what did they get out of it, and what events did it cause to change the world? The United States of America was not just in the bombing of Hiroshima in a variety of ways. In the article “Why America Should Not Have Bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki” Derek talks about how this goes against the Christian faith and it was just pure evil to do the things the U.S. did. In Christian theology, this institution is rooted in the “Pauline principle” that we must not do evil so that good night results” (Woodard-Lehman). This …show more content…

“Before it ended, something dramatic occurred that would change the way nations dealt with each other - perhaps for all of time” (Capio). This specific quote from “The Atomic Bombings of Japan” shows that the U.S. changed the way wars would be fought for the rest of time “Nuclear Warfare” no one wants to have nuclear warfare going on in the World. It would be the end of humanity. Consequently, since the U.S. bombed Hiroshima, we have to live in the fear of nuclear warfare and the human race ending. For these reasons and all the evidence, the U.S. was not justified in bombing Hiroshima. The bombing of Hiroshima had impacted the physical and mental states of survivors, and the ones who sadly passed away. What the U.S. did not realize when bombing Hiroshima is the effect it would have on all these innocent, helpless people. “In Hiroshima alone some 75,000 souls were obliterated instantly, with many more deaths in the following months and years” (Sandberg and Moynihan). All these souls were taken away from the earth and the U.S. did not even care a bit, they just went on as

Show More
Related

Was Truman Justified Dbq Research Paper

636 Words | 3 Pages

On August 6, 1945, the U.S. made history with a fatal blow to the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that ended WWII. To this day there is a controversy on whether the dropping of the atomic bomb, ordered by President Harry S. Truman, was justified or not, but in fact, it was. Thousands of Japanese would perish, but this act would, in turn, saved American lives and end the war. Throughout various battles, the Japanese consistently crossed lines of ethics of warfare, and in an attempt to bring justice and an end to the war Truman put forth a plan to bomb Japan. President Truman warned Japan of the upcoming attack and gave demands, but in the end, the Japanese denied those negotiations which led to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Read More

Potsdam Declaration Dbq

227 Words | 1 Pages

As the Japanese forces were considered the aggressors of the conflict by the Allies and Japanese veterans alike, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Their aggression previous to the bombing was demonstrated through the attack on Pearl Harbour, which led to America’s involvement in World War II. The attack was not one born out of vengeance and was not strategically logical, whereas there was a reason behind the bombing of Hiroshima, that reason being that the Japanese military would not agree to the clauses presented in the Potsdam Declaration. This declaration was given to the military officials as an invitation to surrender before the first bombing, providing ample time for them to make a decision to hopefully end the

Read More

Was Hiroshima Justified Dbq Essay

697 Words | 3 Pages

Yes, it did prevent others from dying, and no, it killed hundreds of thousands innocent people. So the bombing of Hiroshima is both justified and not justified. The first point you could make is yes, the bomb was 100 percent justified and it was a good idea. War is an awful thing that our world has to go through, because many die and lots of land is damaged. An article that agrees the bomb was good claims, “On Okinawa, only a few weeks before Hiroshima, 123,000 JApanese and Americans killed each other.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Japan

109 Words | 1 Pages

I believe that the bombing of Japan was an over the top choice by the Americans. This way of bombing the Japanese was very inhumane, and left thousands dead. The A-bomb was extremely inhumane, there were a number of other options that the americans could have used, instead of bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Some might think that the A-bomb saved america, but it destroyed Japan. They didn’t realize how much the A-bomb would affect the people and the whole country of Japan, the 20,000 kilojoule bomb killed 140,000 people within the months that followed.

Read More

1945 Dbq Essay

791 Words | 4 Pages

The doubts about the U.S. decision in 1945 have been discussed, analyzed, and there are still many controversies. In August 1945, the U.S. decided to use both of its two atomic bombs on Japan to end the war between them during WWII. The atomic bomb has killed about 200,000 people in the Japanese community and brought destruction to the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even though the bomb had terminated the war by Japan surrendering, there were many who were against the action of using the bomb. The reason behind that perspective is that many innocent people have died, and Japan was near surrendering, so there was no need for a major event.

Read More

Should The Us Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq

616 Words | 3 Pages

If the U.S. did not use the atomic bomb, the war could have killed more American soldiers because Japanese soldiers fought to the death. “The U.S. had sustained more than 75,000 casualties.” (Historical Background). The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was just retaliation for Japan's bombing of Pearl Harbor. The bombing was not really about saving lives.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima

543 Words | 3 Pages

To start it off, one of the positive outcomes of the bombing of Hiroshima is that it led to the ending of the war in the Pacific. The war had already a four-year duration and had ensured that victory for the U.S. would be very costly. This would mean that not only would the U.S. lose a lot of money,

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

611 Words | 3 Pages

In an attempt to get Japan to surrender to the Allies, in August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the nation. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and the second on Nagasaki. Although these bombs did contribute to Japan’s surrender and the end of the war, the use of this atomic weapon was an irrational and horrible decision. The United States should have abstained from using the two atomic bombs on Japan for the sake of civilian lives and possible alternatives to their decision. These bombs not only had detrimental effects on Japan, they also led to an arms race amongst several nations.

Read More

Three Narratives Of Our Humanity By John W.

1403 Words | 6 Pages

The use of the atomic bomb when strategically compared to a land invasion, in fact prevented the loss of any U.S. soldiers lives, as well as the death of many Japanese citizens. Excerpts from “Three Narratives of our Humanity” by John W, debates whether or not the nuclear bombing was necessary to shock the Japanese into surrender and describes how the Japanese recall the war through a lens of their own victimization. An excerpt claims, “it is argued that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to shock the Japanese to surrender”. This presents a compelling argument supporting the ethicality of the bombings through its logical and strategic worth.

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq Essay

498 Words | 2 Pages

On August 6th, 1945, The United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing many people. The president at the time, President Truman said that he only wanted to use the bomb in military warfare because it would hurt women and children. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was morally incorrect because the Japanese were ready to surrender, it was a crime against humanity, and it affected their physical self. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unsuitable because the Japanese were ready to surrender.

Read More

Dbq Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

517 Words | 3 Pages

Moreover, as document 6 indicates through a letter from a soldier who fought in the Pacific, many believed that deploying the bomb saved countless American lives and facilitated an end to World War II. According to various arguments put up by supporters of the bombing, it can be inferred that the usage of atomic bombs was an essential and justified action. The belief is that Japan would have prolonged the war further, potentially costing many more lives. Additionally, the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki made Japan sorry for initiating conflict, and eventually led to

Read More

How Is Hiroshima Bombing Justified

1232 Words | 5 Pages

It also had long lasting effects that still impact Japanese lives. In the newspaper by Jack Doherty headlined ¨Atomic Bomb Fury Hits Japan¨ after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the president said, ¨It was to spare the Japanese people from utter destruction.¨ Yet, look where it has gone and how much damage it had cost Japan. I encourage you to not listen to these statements as if they were true, and right the wrongs the atomic bombs have done to Japan by unjustifying the act and telling others to do so as

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Dbq

513 Words | 3 Pages

The decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified because, in war, death will happen no matter what, the Japanese had already done so much damage to the US with Pearl Harbor, they had it

Read More

Nuclear Warfare Dbq

1345 Words | 6 Pages

If people look back into history to the bombing of Japan on August 6, 1945, that killed around 129,000-226,000 people. Thinking that the United States killed that many men, women, and children Japan would have declared an all-out war against the United States. As bad as the effects were on Hiroshima only a few days later the United States dropped another bomb on Nagasaki that left about 80,000 dead and wounded. Even though, those were the only 2 nuclear bombs used ever, but it did indeed deter from World War II because Japan surrendered, but if the Empire of Japan did not surrender the Allied Forces were going to invade the main land of Japan and history states that would be the bloodiest battle ever written in history. On an island around 460 miles 38,000 allied forces were killed or missing and around 107,000 Japanese were killed.

Read More

Hiroshima Bombing Argumentative Essay

797 Words | 4 Pages

The atomic bomb was a terrible thing. It killed 150,000 in Hiroshima and 75,000 in Nagasaki, plus many survivors became horribly disfigured from the intensive heat, and death from radiation is uncertain it may not kill the victims for days, weeks, months, or even years. (Although the bomb did save the USA from sending foot soldier to Japan, the Japanese were ready to surrender on terms that they can keep their empire and we had no need to use it). Japan was the first to feel the destructive power of the atomic bomb. Killing a quarter of a million people and costing two billion dollars of war replenish.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Why The USould Not Have Bombed Hiroshima And Nagasaki

Open Document