ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima

543 Words3 Pages

On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city, Hiroshima. This, in turn, killed over 90,000 people both before and after the collision and turned 4 square miles of the city into rubble. Now, the question that comes to mind; Was dropping the bomb on Hiroshima the correct thing to do? The answer I have come up with is that it was, in fact, a good decision. It helped the war in the Pacific end quicker and decrease the number of casualties. To start it off, one of the positive outcomes of the bombing of Hiroshima is that it led to the ending of the war in the Pacific. The war had already a four-year duration and had ensured that victory for the U.S. would be very costly. This would mean that not only would the U.S. lose a lot of money, …show more content…

Japan had launched an attack on Pearl Harbor that killed about 2,000 American citizens on December 7, 1941. Additionally, the attack had disabled the U.S. Pacific Fleet, which had a non-combatant status at the time. This proved, that Japan not only posed a great threat to the U.S. but also the rest of the Allies. With the attack being both brutal and unexpected, the only reasonable thing to do was to eliminate the possible threat of more casualties. Some may argue that the dropping of the bomb was both unjustified and inhuman, as it killed many innocent Japanese civilians. While taking that into consideration, I still firmly believe the U.S. did it for the greater good of humanity. The fact of the matter is, there would have been many more innocent lives lost if the war would have continued, as I’ve mentioned before. Japan had made it more than clear that they weren’t going to surrender easily, and drastic measures had to be taken. The way I see it, there are times where you have to be willing to abandon your humanity in order to change anything, and that is just what the U.S.

Show More
Related
227 Words | 1 Pages

As the Japanese forces were considered the aggressors of the conflict by the Allies and Japanese veterans alike, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Their aggression previous to the bombing was demonstrated through the attack on Pearl Harbour, which led to America’s involvement in World War II. The attack was not one born out of vengeance and was not strategically logical, whereas there was a reason behind the bombing of Hiroshima, that reason being that the Japanese military would not agree to the clauses presented in the Potsdam Declaration. This declaration was given to the military officials as an invitation to surrender before the first bombing, providing ample time for them to make a decision to hopefully end the

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

With more and more US lives being lost or will be lost when invading Japan more and more, the US made the reasonable decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan because like what Chamber said to win the war you have to end the other side and, “make it terrible, and the war will

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

The deadly bombing on Japan saved the lives of many in America, prevented them from attacking the U.S like the one on Pearl Harbor, and it brought a sense of peace to the U.S. It is significant to the understanding of WWII because the events of the atomic bombs were the end of

Read More
345 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore knowing how the Japanese soldiers think about surrendering, the millions of lives saved by ending the war quickly and shortly, and the countless warnings given to the Japanese, I think dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was warranted and

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

Dropping a nuke on a country can cause lots of difficulty. The Americans dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was the most controversial topics in American history. Truman was the active president who made the final decision for this act. Many people believe that Truman made the correct decision while others are in complete disagreement with the decision. President Truman made the correct choice in dropping the atomic bomb because it showed the United States had power, it helped end the war quickly, and saved many lives.

Read More
735 Words | 3 Pages

Nagasaki was a strategic place to drop the bomb because of the torpedo plant, but Hiroshima only had a military base, so why drop on Hiroshima? Therefore, was the United States’ decision ethical and fair to the

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

The US decision to drop atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 has generated much controversy over the years. Some argue that the bombing was necessary to end World War II, while others believed that more than 200,000 civilians died in vain. The use of this disastrous weapon caused a split in society which came down to the usage being necessary for the victory of the Allied Powers as well as stopping more Japanese crimes or a merciless crime that greatly injured an already kneeling, surrendering nation and caused mass innocent deaths. Due to previous Japanese actions, the dropping of the atomic bomb was justified and needed to be done to protect Americans and other countries oppressed by the Japanese.

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

The decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan is a decision that has been debated since the bomb fell. While Truman may have made the decision because he felt it was “ethical,” the actual amount of ethics in the decision has been up for debate. The atomic bomb had been in design before Truman stepped up to president when Franklin D. Roosevelt died of a cerebral hemorrhage in April of 1945. The atomic bomb had actually been in development since Albert Einstein warned the United States that Germany was trying to develop an atomic bomb of its own in 1939.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine the sudden loss of 70,000 lives: 70,000 futures obliterated, 70,000 bodies decimated, and 70,000 families grieving. That was the impact of the bombing of Hiroshima. Similar results happened at Nagasaki. The decision of whether or not the United States should have dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been heavily debated for decades. The atomic bombing of Hiroshima was not a military necessity because there were other options, it was ethically wrong, and the United States was already winning.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Should the U.S. have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan? Some people believe that the U.S. should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan, while others believe that the U.S. did the right thing by dropping the bombs. One thing both sides should agree upon is that the atomic bombs dropped on Japan ended the war faster than it would have if the U.S. did not drop the bombs. The atomic bombing on Japan was necessary for the war to end because it stopped the fighting and additional casualties that would have occurred if the war had not ended. The U.S. did the right thing by dropping the atomic bombs because they prevented the additional casualties that would have occurred.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

Dropping the Atomic Bomb The debate of whether or not the U.S. should've dropped the atomic bomb is a popular one. There are many different perspectives that are researched and made. Based on the information I have read, I feel that the dropping of the atomic bomb was unnecessary and caused more harm rather than good. One main factor when it comes to the decision of dropping the bomb is how destructive it really is.

Read More
1134 Words | 5 Pages

These atomic bombs, in the eyes of the United States during this time, looked like miracles from God, ending this tragedy of war and saving American citizens. Looking back at this decision in history, was saving ourselves and causing some much harm worth it? Did we need to kill so many innocent people, including children, to be a victor in a one-sided attack? The United States should have never dropped

Read More
1840 Words | 8 Pages

Was America Justified in dropping the atom bomb on Hiroshima in August 1945? On August 6th, 1945 at 8:16 AM, a great yet horrific event in history occurred. This event is known as the dropping of the atom bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan, the event that would begin and end the pain and suffering of millions. The atom bomb was dropped by an American B-29 Superfortress bomber named Enola Gay and

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bombs on World War II on the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a very important part of World War II. The atomic bomb ended the war between America and Japan. This was just one of the important events during the battle in World War II. The Battle at Pearl Harbor, where the Japanese attacked U.S. soil was also why the americans bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Some believe that the United States was correct in dropping these bombs on Japan because of the attack on Pearl Harbor while others believe that it was very wrong to dropped the bomb.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima

Related Topics

Open Document