Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bombs

504 Words3 Pages

Ivonne Lopez Mr. Laubacher U.S. History 15 March 2023 Advantages Disadvantages It can lead to the end of WW2 125,000 killed Save many lives of American Soldiers fewer soldiers It was revenge for Japan’s attack at Pearl Harbor Lost 884,100,00 yen It can change the global power Was created to destroy on a massive scale It could roughly save 30 million people Ground invasions Dropping the Bombs The decision to use the Atomic Bomb affected the way individuals like Truman perceived the war. Even though Harry Truman’s decision affected the way the war turned he did think of how the bomb will affect Japan and its civilians. Which made me think that he did create a way to stop the war which is why, I would also believe in dropping the bombs. President Truman had three options which did make him perceive the way he will fight, 1 to continue bombing Japanese cities, 2 to invade Japan, and 3 demonstrate the bomb on an unpopulated island or an inhabited Japanese city. …show more content…

The Article also stated that Truman was forced to keep fighting because “ “Despite their heavy losses at Okinawa and the firebombing of Tokyo, the Japanese refused to surrender.” If I was him I wouldn’t have stopped up until they surrendered. The bombings was one of the most terrible things to happen but they didn’t surrender and so I would have kept fighting. Even though the bombing was unconventional he was able to almost completely destroy Tokyo. In which, the bombing was a source of having less soldiers on the Japanese side. Even though Truman was beaten on this he was able to stop more to join their