During harry S. Truman's presidency he was faced with one of the most world altering decisions in the war against japan. The use of atomic weapons would set an example of the united states of america’s military strength,power and knowledge of a very destructive technology. It was necessary for president Truman to drop the atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki for these reasons. American soilders were tired from the four years of fighting and a surrender from Japan was not in sight.. In (Doc L) it says the bomb saved more lives than killed people in the end, President Truman needed to retaliate for their attack on Pearl Harbor and the bomb would just end the war more quicker.
Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.
The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.
Why was there a debate about dropping the atomic bomb on Japan and finally ending the war? The bomb caused lots of destruction but was a possible solution to end the war in the Pacific for the United States. The atomic bomb was originally a secret project initiated in 1924, and the goal of this bomb was to create unmatched destructive powers with long-term detriments attached. One argument about the bomb was that the bomb should have been dropped on Japan. People believed this because the atomic bomb ended the war and destruction.
Dropping a nuke on a country can cause lots of difficulty. The Americans dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was the most controversial topics in American history. Truman was the active president who made the final decision for this act. Many people believe that Truman made the correct decision while others are in complete disagreement with the decision. President Truman made the correct choice in dropping the atomic bomb because it showed the United States had power, it helped end the war quickly, and saved many lives.
As president, it was Truman’s decision if the weapon would be used with the goal to end the war (Biography). If we were to drop a bomb, it could potentially come back and hurt us in the end. If we were to not drop a bomb, the Japanese could harm our country first and ruin our economy. This was a crucial decision which shows Truman’s courage, and which took a toll on each
The decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan is a decision that has been debated since the bomb fell. While Truman may have made the decision because he felt it was “ethical,” the actual amount of ethics in the decision has been up for debate. The atomic bomb had been in design before Truman stepped up to president when Franklin D. Roosevelt died of a cerebral hemorrhage in April of 1945. The atomic bomb had actually been in development since Albert Einstein warned the United States that Germany was trying to develop an atomic bomb of its own in 1939.
After Japan attacked Pearl Harbor in the Hawaiian Islands, President Truman dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Since then, there has been arguments whether the bombs should have been dropped or not. President Truman’s choice to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was really the only option he had back then. Today, the bombs that President Truman dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is thought as a horrible event, but Truman dropped the bombs to save American and Japanese lives, and in the end, shortened the war. Before President Truman decidecd to drop the two atomic bombs, the war with the Japanese had no end insight.
By 1945, over 40,000 U.S. soldiers had already died in the fight, and military strategists were worried about the number increasing if they invaded Japan by land. This tells me that it probably was a hard decision for many people in the U.S. on whether to drop the atomic bomb or not. The last reason is that the U.S. is not the only one trying to build the atomic bomb. Germany and Japan were also trying to make the atomic
From my stand point, I believe that President Harry Truman felt he had no other choice. The Japanese were not going to surrender and Truman made a military decision to use the first atomic bomb. I truly feel the bomb was necessary and crucial to ending the World War II. There were already so many casualties and, yes, the bombing did produce many casualties but what if we had not used the bomb; how many casualties would there have been if the war just had continued? By using the atomic bombs, Truman ensured that no more American lives would be spared and protecting Americans was his top priority.
What is being said is that the Atomic Bomb had a more meaningless outcome than a positive one, The Bomb did have both a Negative and Positive Outcome but it was really a meaningless and more negative victory during World War 2. To quickly recap what happened in the final parts of World War II. In 1941 Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, and ultimately destroyed the ship, killing 2403 people, and wounding 1178. US Military Tools and ships
Opinion Atomic Bomb Paper - Unassisted Are you against or with the idea of dropping the atomic bomb?If you think we shouldn't be wrong. What would have happened if we didn’t drop the atomic bomb. If you didn’t know an atomic bomb was a bond that we made to end world war 2.In my opinion dropping the atomic bomb was the right idea. How World War Two Started First,World War Two started in 1939 and ended in 1945.It was a global war that fought between different countries.
In the article “Why We Did It” ,it stated that people wanted the war to end (“Why We Did It”, 1995). People were tired of the sacrifice of the army. For better understanding imagine that someone has not seen their friend for a long time because they are fighting a war and they want to see them again and are tired of the war with Japan and just wants this battle to stop. Many people have felt exhausted from the long lasting wars being fought and wanted it to end. Soon the atomic bomb was the solution to end this.
About 6 days after the bombing of Nagasaki Japan decided to surrender ending the devastating WW2. Even 70 years after this event, the decision to drop the atomic bomb continues to be widely debated. When Harry Truman first learned of the Manhattan project he knew that he had a undesirable decision coming up. President Truman described the atomic bomb as the most terrible thing discovered but he had the power to end the war with Japan. Even after the Americans were wiping out the Japanese they refused to give up and put an end to the war.
President Truman and his associates believed that if they dropped the bomb they would receive surrender from Japan. Thus, saving millions of American lives, and ending the war. Nevertheless, by saving American lives they would sacrifice thousands of Japanese civilians. They had other idea to have Japan to surrender, but were willing to take the one that would have the most consequences. They were thinking too much about the US instead of creating actually peace within the nations.
