ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Preventing The Extinction Of The Native American Population

238 Words1 Pages
In 1793 Timothy Pickering had a suggestion for how to prevent the extinction of the Native American population, by moving them over the Mississippi (Garrison 13). Between the years of 1816 and 1850 more than 100,000 Native Americans from all over North America were forced onto certain lands of territory west of the Mississippi (O’Neill 37). They were often forced to move to territory that had little to no resemblance of where they came from; villages that roamed hills, forests and lush vegetation had the possibility of being relocated to an area that was nothing but barren desert (O’Neill 12). Many had attempted to move Native Americans, but President Andrew Jackson and his administration were the first to have their proposal legislated by
Show More
Related
257 Words | 2 Pages

DBQ Andrew Jackson Andrew jackson was the first one to actually move the indians even though other presidents spoke to do it but never did. Andrew said that if they wish to stay they have to follow the country’s law’s. .he moved them somewhere where Lewis and Clark said was a dessert. When he moved them that gave us a lot more land to grow our population and more farm land. But as soon as they figured out that the farmland over were they moved, the American’s moved the indians again.

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

In 1814, a military leader Andrew Jackson led several battles that forced the Creek Indians to sign the Treaty of Fort Jackson and give up 23 million acres of their land. Since then, the Cherokee and other Native American tribes have adapted themselves and their culture to become ‘civilized’. Andrew Jackson later became elected as president and in his first Annual Address to Congress, he introduced his support for Indian Removal. The Indian Removal Act was signed by President Jackson on May 28, 1830.

Read More
889 Words | 4 Pages

President Jackson claimed that it was in the best interest of the States, the citizens, growth of the Southwest and of the Indians for Indians to be relocated west. One of President Jackson’s main point was that “it will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; and allow them to pursue happiness in their own

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

The government had been acquiring native land through cessions from as early as the 1720s (Document A). These land treaties had been a common occurrence for over a century. Jackson was no different in that sense, as the Indian Removal Act was seemingly rooted in the same motivations for expansion as the settlers that came before him. Furthermore, the majority of Americans during and leading up to the Indian Removal Act shared the same view of the Indians’ future as inhabitants of the United States. Most leaders of the country agreed that the Indians should be moved westward, so the territories in the Southeast could be further developed (Foner 280).

Read More
1744 Words | 7 Pages

Early in Jacksons administration he passed the Indian Removal Act (1830) which gave the government funding to remove the ‘Five Civilised Tribes’ which included the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole Indians – a total of nearly 60,000. The act authorised the relocation of the tribes previously situated to the east of the Mississippi river to the west. The act didn’t allow the forced removal of the tribes but it allowed Jackson to negotiate with the tribes for their land which he did and led to their removal. This was made worse as the tribes unlike the other Indian tribes had done all they could to integrate into American society. For example, the Cherokee tribe created their own written language which set a precedent for Indians, they established education for their children, and even created a constitution which they had to adhere to.

Read More
1615 Words | 7 Pages

In 1830, just a year after taking office, Jackson pushed a new piece of legislation called the "Indian Removal Act" through both houses of Congress. It gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi. Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their lands east of the Mississippi in exchange for lands to the west. Those wishing to remain in the east would become citizens of their home state. This act affected not only the southeastern nations, but many others further north.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

In 1830 Andrew Jackson formed The Indian Removal Act. ( Hall pg 395) The United States Government made it mandatory for Cherokee, Creek, Seminole, Chickasaw and Choctaw to leave their lands in the south, and relocate west of the Mississippi River (Hall pg 395). Many Native-Americans became ill and died. (Hall pg 395) Some died of the immense length of their journey, many of the Natives died from malnutrition as well as a complete lack of food.(Hall pg 395) The Indian Removal stated that all Indians had to walk to the Mississippi River, it did not matter how old you were or young,

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

With the country growing, space was running out. The only reasonable solution to Jackson, was to relocate the Native Americans. He signed the Indian Removal Act, which traded the Native's homelands for ones west of the Mississippi. Some Indian tribes gave in, and relocated without a fight. But others, such as the Seminole Tribe and Cherokee, stayed and fought the relocation.

Read More
238 Words | 1 Pages

Something that had one of the biggest impacts on the world as it is today is colonization. There’s no way that the world we live in would be the same without it. From colonization, a multitude of good things came out of it, such as wealth for many nations, new land discovered, and colonies established. However, all of those things came at a price to others. The negatives of colonization affected the Native Americans (North, South, and Central America) and the Africans.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

The land the people wanted was occupied and owned by Native American tribes. This prompted Jackson to pass the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This law allowed him to remove Native American tribes from their land and move them to “Indian Territory.” The topic of removal was not new to Jackson. He has been in campaigns against the Creeks and the Seminoles before.

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

Jacksons’ first year in office plans was to move the Indians west of the Mississippi. Whit the relocation Americans

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

The government tried to force assimilation on Native Americans as well as an attempt to “kill the indian, save the man.” These ideas and policies are similar to those popular during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Jackson developed a sense of ‘paternalism’ towards indians and believed he was saving them by forcing them to live out west of the Mississippi river away from white culture. The difference was that Jackson did not believe in assimilation of indians into white culture, he believed they should be kept separate. With the help of the Federal government removing indians from land west of the Mississippi, Americans were

Read More
558 Words | 3 Pages

The progression that we as the privileged face has caused the regression of the unprivileged. The Age of Exploration was a time period of laying the stepping stones to progression. However, we were given the advantage to define the word progression. The ignorance that we have put forth in realizing the different definitions of progression is depicted in Ishmael, “‘... the Plain Indians had been agriculturalists for centuries. As soon as horses became readily available, they abandoned agriculture and resumed the hunting-gathering life’”(Quinn 217).

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

Today kids take in our history from various perspectives , yet what they don 't do is tell all of significant data . How Columbus did to the Arawaks of the Bahamas , how Cortes did to the Aztecs of Mexico , how Pizarro did to the Incas of Peru , and how the English explorers of Virginia and Massachusetts did to the Powhatans did to the Pequots. The most obliteration was in 1942 when Columbus assaulted and about wiped a whole masses out . Europeans delivered comes about for the duration of my life today since life would be differing we wouldn 't have a huge bit of the stuff we have at this moment . We wouldn 't have as much compelling events , also we would have a more prominent measure of the Native people than we have today .

Read More
645 Words | 3 Pages

Without a doubt, Indian reservations are one of the poorest communities in the nation. But what exactly contributes to such low employment, poor healthcare, and education? Since the birth of this nation the United States has inquired trillions of dollars from Native Americans; giving Native Americans reparations is our moral way of repaying them for what we stole. The employment rate on reservations is alarming.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Preventing The Extinction Of The Native American Population

Open Document