More handpicked essays just for you.
Constitutional rights of prisoners
Racial disparity in the criminal justice
Racial disparity in the criminal justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Constitutional rights of prisoners
Officers are held to a higher standard for a reason, because they are the ones who are charged with keeping the public safe and upholding the rights and laws of the community. Being a police officer does not allow someone to take advantage of that authority and power to hit, beat, kick, choke, or inflict any other kind of harm to any child especially their own child. Why go through all of the training and other requirements to become a police officer just to ruin it all by afflicting pain on someone who’s of your own
later that night he leaped at a swat member with a kitchen knife, and the swat member had to shoot to save his life (MacDonald 16). All cops are trained for fast and appropriate responses in any situation, but especially dangerous ones. If a man attacks an officer, he will end up shot by a taser or a real handgun or rifle. The assailant in this case was a major threat to an officer 's life. The officer was forced to react..
Both criminals and officer should be protected. But not all situations are brutal from the 8th amendment, there may be people that watch footage in cases, and inform others. For instance watching the footage and blaming a police officer for using unnecessary force. Although it is an issue, in riot situations, many people believe that officers should have the right to defend themselves and others such as the surrounding; communities, people around, or even businesses. People consider that using tasers or pepper spray or even using just a little force is considered police brutality.
One common opinion is that officers should not use more force than is necessary or reasonable, and even then, that force should be used only as a last resort. “Police use force to affect civilians’ conduct. On a day-to-day basis, they do so most often by employing the least degree of force available to them, their mere presence. Cops wear uniforms and drive distinctly marked cars so that, without saying a word, they may have an effect on citizens’ behavior” (Fyfe, 38). When an officer’s presence fails to fulfill the desired conduct, the next course of action for said officer would be verbalization.
Duke was always against the technique of using a baton to hold the submission and always spoke on the harm the officers would go through if anything turns out to a tragic death. Duke’s perspective on the scenario was that it was all the police commission to blame, and “The whole thing boils down to… Powell was ineffective
There is blunt impact which an officer uses a baton or projectile to immobilize a combative person. Then you have chemical use is when an officer uses pepper spray to restrain a person. Then the officers also have the option to use Conducted Energy Devices (CEDs) those are used to immobilize an individual and they discharge a high voltage of electricity. The last step of the use of force continuum is lethal force and this step Officers use lethal weapons to gain control of a situation. Should only be used if a suspect poses a serious threat to the officer or another individual.
When a New York Police officer put Eric Garner in headlock and started chocking Eric, even though he repeatedly said he couldn’t breathe. The incident lasted somewhere from 15- 18 seconds while the officer was obtaining him. The Medical Examiner of New York City said that the death of Garner was due to mixture of things. Eric Garner had a history of poor health and with the combination of a chokehold and the compression of his chest was the cause of death. a That matter in the fact is that is illegal for a police officer to put a suspect or obtained in a “headlock.”
It can be hard to prosecute a cop for these actions due to the constant state of threat a cop’s life is at while doing their job and the unpredictability of their job. An example of an case where the police’s use of force were questioned was the Wardlaw v. Pickett case. In this case a man named, William C. Wardlaw decided to sue the United States Deputy Marshals, William Pickett and Albert Crew. Wardlaw claimed that the two violated his constitutional rights by using excessive force on him and falsing arresting and prosecuting him.
This technique is use when an officer has to go hand on without using disabling injury with an individual to get him or her detain. For example, if the officer advised an individual to place his or her hands behind their back, but the suspect refused the officer make use a takedown technique to detain the suspect. Use of lethal compliance techniques is when an officer physically incapacitates the individual when trying to make the arrest of the individual. For example, if the officer witnessed an individual to commit a crime in his presence and the officer advised that person to stop and the suspect flee from the officer. The officer advised dispatch of the incident and take off running after the suspect and the officer caught the suspect, but the suspect started to resist by fighting the officer.
There are many ways to define success and there are also many ways people view success in different ways. Individuals can achieve success while venturing down many different paths in life and (conversely) people can also fail in while following a single path to success. Cathy Davidson discusses the positives of the impact that technology has on the classroom in, her writing, “Project Classroom Makeover.” Davidson also discusses how society has been moving towards a standardized way of learning for the past few decades. The knowledge that the public needed to know throughout the past was not as intense as what they need to can comprehend now.
People pick the side that either defends or criticize police officers use of force. However, the people do not realize that this topic is plainly ridiculous and dangerous. This issue will not only hurt both sides, but also harm innocent civilians as well. Police brutality is a big dispute between different communities; however, there are several solutions that can solve this
The Bill of Rights is the most influential historical document because it is the basis of our human rights. The Bill of Rights was created after the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. The Founding Fathers realized that a set of “rights” should be written and approved in order to avoid arguments between citizen and citizen or citizen and government. James Madison took most of the lead when creating this document. He wrote out a list of all the rights that a United States citizen should have.
There arises a problem when the officers intended to uphold this law target individuals solely based on their race. In one instance a Black woman was taken out of a car and forced into a building as a policeman watched on. When she emerged all bruised and bloodied, Wright “watched him throw her into a patrol wagon.” (7) The woman was arrested for supposedly being drunk when the officer had clearly seen that she had done nothing wrong and was instead the victim. Wright experienced this same phenomenon himself.
[ Imagine this scenario: you are complying with the police that are screaming at you, guns pointed at you, screaming “please don 't shoot” and trying your best to do what the police are asking. Daniel Shaver was an unarmed man fatally shot for no good reason. He was complying with the police officers orders and was begging for his life, screaming “please don’t shoot,” before he was fatally shot 5 times. Unfortunately, this is just one example of police brutality, an instance when police use unnecessary force when either they are unarmed or are complying with orders. Today I want to tell you of the injustice of police brutality, the people it affects, and how just asking the right questions could make sure that police are punished for their crimes.
The two moral reasonings are consequentialist and categorical. Consequentialist means the consequences that will result after whatever you do, whether it is the right or wrong thing to do. Categorical moral reasoning locates morality in certain duties and rights. Somethings are just morally wrong even if it brings good outcomes. According to Mill the principle of utility means realizing a consequence of something before you do it,whether your intentions are good or bad.
