Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
In their journal “The Case of Paying College Athletes”, John Siegfried and Allen Sanderson point out many discrepancies in NCAA policies, but do not support monetary payment. They argue: “College athletes are in fact currently paid, in the sense that the majority receive grants-in-aid that cover most – although not all – of their college expenses.” (Pg. 127). After this statement, the authors detail the demanding payments varying depending on each college
Injustice Case for NCAA Players NCAA athletes should be compensated due to their devotion towards extra-curricular schooling along with recreational activities. In the Huffington Post, economist convey that NCAA schools can definitely afford to pay college athletes. Spokeswoman Meghan Durham asserts that only 20 of the approximate 1,100 schools which constitute the NCAA make more from sports than they spend on sports, according to association’s most recent estimates. Rodney Fort, former sports economists…exposes that the money is already there since the NCAA brought about a billion dollars in revenue in its most recent financial year and top tier athletic programs regularly bring in tens of millions of dollars as well. Opponents stated that
are the only people getting paid while the football, basketball, soccer, tennis players do all the hard work making the NCAA billions of dollars every year studies that were conducted found this to be very disturbing, considering the fact that college football games bring in 10.8 billion dollars a year, college basketball brings in 27 billion dollars a year, and not one football or basketball player sees any money made from the games they slaved over. The reason the people in charge of the NCAA will get away with what they’ve done to players for years on end is because the coaches and other staff are getting paid to shut their mouths and not speak out against the NCAA, because they need a job, these young men and women work so hard throughout their sport seasons with practices, training, conditioning, and games these students athletes need some type of pay and most of all educational help on and off the field to help them do good in school and focus on their passion. Now back to the first point made about the NCAA believing that if they partnered with universities around the world to grant every young man and woman a full scholarship to play sports for their brand and that school then they receive free benefits like a room and board, books
Annotative bibliography: Should college athletes be paid? Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is allowed to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. It is very problematic rules and many people and professional do not agree with these rules. Despite all the researches that suggested that NCAA the Universities makes multimillions dollars a year from college’s sport, the NCAA still insisting on applying the rule that no college athletes should be compensated about their effort and time.
Recently, many athletes, at the college and professional level, have been in trouble with the law. Athletes have gotten away with violating many laws and policies, but now they are starting to be punished. The NCAA has not done enough to punish their athletes, because the athletes are still behaving wrongly. Athletes that have faced consequences are still causing problems. Therefore, the NCAA needs to do something different in their punishing of the responsible colleges, coaches, and especially players.
The NCAA says that they don’t want to pay college athletes because of their scholarships. As the money keeps flowing more and more each and every year, it comes with more arguments about the athletes getting the money that they deserve. Sounds as if college athletes are blindly signing a sheet of paper and the NCAA has an evil smirk saying “You have no idea what you’ve gotten yourself into”. A court case had also gone down about a young college athlete and a car dealership. The dealership was using the athletes to make more sales with his cars and was doing behind the athletes back without
The Injustice of the NCAA The NCAA is making an extremely large profit on the amateur athletic performance of student athletes, without them seeing a penny. The NCAA earns around 1.5-2.0 billion dollars on average every year (compared to the NFL at 1.0-2.0 billion dollars as well). They are additionally qualifying themselves as a non-profit organization, therefore not having to pay taxes on any of the money they receive. College athletes should be able to receive an allowance, besides the scholarships they receive, because many students struggle to get through the week, paying for food, clothing, and other essential items. Student athletes, as stated in bylaw 15.01.2 of the NCAA handbook, are not allowed to take any handout or financial help
The fight for payment of college athletes has not been quick one as more and more issues keep popping up. The NCAA has never allowed payment of its athletes, but small steps towards the overall goal has questioned the NCAA’s past. Its’ decisions has stayed constant since its founding in 1906. The first issue in this decision would not occur until 1952 when the NCAA ruled to give The University of Kentucky the ‘death penalty’ for paying their athletes. This ‘death penalty’ is a one year program ban from participation, the harshest penalty the NCAA can give.
The world of collegiate sports is not immune to controversy happening on and off its courts or playing fields when it comes to life of the players and the organization. A reoccurring controversy that goes on almost every season in every sport is the act of paying college athletes for their participation. The NCAA rules strictly prevent college athletes from accepting any forms of compensation for performance while under amateurism regulations.
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
A personal opinion from one of my former high school teammates one hundred percent agrees with this topic, that high school athletes who are passionate about their sport should join a club or AAU team. She also agrees that high school sports are dying due to coaches, athletic directors, and families willing to put in money for their athlete to play. She states that “High school athletes don’t take their sport seriously because their coaches don’t create a championship environments. Schools such as Clovis West have such success because the coach demands a high level of each and every one of the players. They have mandatory weight room and twice a day practices.
Amateurism in college athletics is an exploitation of the athletes who participate in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sports. The amount of work that is done by these athletes to help their respective institutions generate millions of dollars in revenue, goes seemingly unnoticed when identifying the substantial amount of money flow in NCAA sports and the amount of people, from stakeholders to alumni, that benefit from this source. Amateurism, the foundation of NCAA sports, has been in place for over a century of time dating back to the early 1900s. Any athlete who is making money for work they’ve done outside of their institution is not being exploited, however, an athlete can easily be placed on the other end of the spectrum when he or she is withheld from recognizing the true monetary value of their talents and likeness that are being used for the profit of the school or others. The NCAA is understandably satisfied with the continuous growth of its’ revenue each year, yet the problem they face of having people accept that “student-athletes” are just amateurs is growing as well.
We find Jamal in the same position as many student athletes; that is, he has found success on the ballfield but not in the classroom. Since Jamal has already reached tenth grade, many teachers may have given up on educating him and just want to “pass him along” to keep peace with the school’s athletic department, Jamal’s parents, and sometimes even the school’s administration. This behavior of passing him along has likely suited Jamal, as well, since, like most people, he prefers to take part in activities that result in success and bring him praise. Even in the light of Jamal’s contentment with doing the least he can to get by, as his language arts teacher, it is my job to educate him, that is, to enable him to read and understand what
Sports scholarships can help students who can't afford to go to college, get a better education. Sports scholarships are for students who excel in a sport, and a college will give the student money to play their sport at their college. This is amazing for students but there are various downsides. Sometimes the scholarship can be a hindrance for the student causing them not to reach their academic potential. Sports scholarships are also rare and can be a false hope for families not able to afford college.
