ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima

1166 Words5 Pages

On August 6th of 1945, a revolutionary form of destruction was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The atomic bomb, nicknamed Little Boy, was the first uranium-fission-based bomb to ever be detonated. At 8:15 AM, America wrought destruction and performed the worst injustice imaginable upon the city, its surroundings, and its people. President at the time, Harry S. Truman, gave consent to the creation and use of such a weapon, and quite frankly, is to blame. President Truman should not have dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima because it was the cause of the inhumane murder of over 130,000 innocent Japanese civilians, its motivations were unjustified and there were several, other alternatives to the “a-bomb.” Simply put, the bomb was …show more content…

There were many alternatives, these include a demonstration of the bomb, waiting on the Russians and the continuation of a traditional bombing. In the BBC documentary, there was a discussion of demonstrating the atom bomb upon uninhabited areas of Japan to intimidate them. If this were to have happened, over 130,000 people would not have died and neither would the eighth largest Japanese city be decimated. A reason why waiting on the Russians to invade with ground troops would have been plausible is because it would have tipped Japan over the edge and finally given them a sense of inevitable defeat. This also proves the Truman and America were attempting to terrify the Russians and establish a foolish sense of dominance, yet they still invaded week after the bombing! Finally, there was the argument of conventional bombing over atom bombing. Believably, if conventional bombings were enough to nearly make Japan surrender, why did Truman go even further as to dropping a mass weapon of ruination? The Strategic Bombing Survey states, “‘...even without the atomic bombing attacks, air supremacy over Japan could have exerted sufficient pressure to bring about the unconditional surrender…” (Anesi.Com). Thus, if we had continued with a few more B-23 bombings, we would have reached the surrender we first demanded. Despite these other possibilities, Truman was uninformed and did not take them into account, resulting in a ridiculous, dramatically fatal

Show More
Related
642 Words | 3 Pages

But he had no compelling reason to do so. The bomb provided a promising way to bring about a prompt Japanese surrender without the disadvantages of other alternatives, and in Truman’s mind, its use did not require a lengthy consideration” (Walker pg. 96). After the bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, people decided that the bombs were actually required. The people thought that if the bombs weren’t dropped, thousands of American lives would have died while America invaded Japan. The problem with this logic is that many people died in those bombings.

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

Yes, it did put an end to the war but it also started one as well. So, ultimately I believe Truman was not justified due to the fact that there were many more solutions to the

Read More
645 Words | 3 Pages

Truman’s decision to bomb Japan was right for many reasons. One piece of evidence that shows Truman made the right decision is when Japan captured our American troops and kept them as prisoners, they beat and starved them and even went as far as executing them, he talks about this in his radio report to the American people. " against those who have starved and beaten and executed American prisoners of war" (DocF). A second piece of evidence that shows Truman made the right decision is he was just trying to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans. He talks about both of these pieces of evidence in his radio to the American people. "

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

According to Document G, a memoir of General H. H. Arnold, whether or not the bombs were dropped, the Japanese were already on the verge of surrendering. The United States had already killed about 241,000 people, wounded 313,000, and destroyed about 2,333,000 homes, making it increasingly evident that their decision to drop the bomb was just a selfish and easy manner to end the war. The document also states that the air force was aware that the destruction of most Japanese industries and the prevention of the arrival of the incoming cargo had made it impossible for Japan to carry out a large-scale war. With this fact, the knowledge of their increasing vulnerability was in effect throughout the military and the white house, bringing to light the leverage the United States had going through with the bombings. Overall, the decision to drop the bombs can be viewed as unnecessary as the U.S could have kept fighting knowing that

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.

Read More
1963 Words | 8 Pages

The Japanese were ruthless and brutal when it came to their militaristic decisions and motives. Dropping the atomic bomb was our final hope in stopping them from performing further harm. Either way, lives were going to be taken. The question we must ask ourselves is whether we wanted those lives to be those of Americans or the Japanese. President Truman had to make a vital decision, and using nuclear warfare was the only way to stop Japan without killing American soldiers.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

On August 6th, 1945, The United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing many people. The president at the time, President Truman said that he only wanted to use the bomb in military warfare because it would hurt women and children. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was morally incorrect because the Japanese were ready to surrender, it was a crime against humanity, and it affected their physical self. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unsuitable because the Japanese were ready to surrender.

Read More
1327 Words | 6 Pages

Essay To what extent were the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki justifiable? The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been controversial. There is much controversy over the issue of whether or not the bombings were necessary to ensure Japanese surrender in the Second World War, on terms satisfactory to the United States of America.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

The Article also stated that Truman was forced to keep fighting because “ “Despite their heavy losses at Okinawa and the firebombing of Tokyo, the Japanese refused to surrender.” If I was him I wouldn’t have stopped up until they surrendered. The bombings was one of the most terrible things to happen but they didn’t surrender and so I would have kept fighting. Even though the bombing was unconventional he was able to almost completely destroy Tokyo. In which, the bombing was a source of having less soldiers on the Japanese side.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

The first option was to continue taking islands in the Pacific Ocean and invade Japan with ground troops. This option would be the costliest for Allied forces and would likely cost the Japanese a massive amount of lives. The second option would be air raids on Japanese cities and destroying their ports. The problem with this option would be that planes would likely be shot down long before they even got close to Japanese territory. It would also take a decent amount of time to break though the Japanese resistance and it would be cause a decent amount of civilian causalities.

Read More
1840 Words | 8 Pages

There are many reasons why it could be argued that the dropping of the atomic bomb was justified. One reason is that Japan was warned, they were given plenty of opportunities to surrender such as the Potsdam declaration. The Declaration was issued to Japan by President Truman and the Allies of America after America had tested the Atom bomb on July 26th. The declaration was a proposition of surrender to Japan that linked directly to the dropping of the atomic bomb.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman was treating people even worst by putting them through the torture of the bomb and the resulting effects of the bomb. Time became a major factor into the decision, and dropping the bomb was a result of that fear. On the other side of the argument, the Japanese did bomb Pearl Harbor which was the catalyst that got America involved in the first place. We as a country should not need to compromise with the nation who started the battle.

Read More
1073 Words | 5 Pages

President Truman knew the effects of atomic warfare and selfishly continued to harm Japan. In July 1945, the first successful testing of the atomic bomb happened in the United States. Truman called it “the most terrible bomb in the

Read More
1637 Words | 7 Pages

“I do not fear death. I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it” (Twain). Death is a natural fear in which all people face at one point in their life. Because people do not know what happens when they pass away, it is natural to either be scared of the unknown or push the thought to the side and accept it blindly. In literature, often times as people get near the end of their life, they accept their inevitable doom.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima

Related Topics

Open Document