“It must have been nice to be surrounded by a courtroom full of people fighting about whether he should live or die. None of us in Boston that day had such a luxury.” (“Why The Death Penalty Should Live.” 1) In our nation's society, the death penalty has been and still is an effective and reasonable way for America's worst convicted criminals and convicted terrorists to pay for their crimes, deter future crimes, bring justice, and closure for victims’ families. In America, the United States allows five death penalty options, even though lethal injection is the main execution method used today. Lethal injection, electrocution, gas chamber, firing squad, and hanging are the five allowed execution methods. Lethal injection was first used in …show more content…
Christian views differ from non-Christian views on the subject of the death penalty. ‘Mercy requires justice’ and God agrees that authorities wield the world. Acts 25:11 says, “If… I am guilty of doing anything deserving death, I do not refuse to die.” (“Why I Support Capital Punishment” 1) The gunman who killed those in the South Carolina church had no remorse. He complied to plead guilty if the death penalty was removed from the table of discussion. He thought it to be okay to kill innocents inside a church, but when the discussion of his death was brought up, all bets were …show more content…
People weigh outcomes of decisions as do criminals, so if the death penalty exists their choice of murder may go down. Studies have shown that less murders occur when executions increase. In a recent study, it has been proven that the death penalty saves lives. Americans also approve because minorities are treated fairly and the deterrent rate is strong. Unsympathetic people with no remorse deserve capital punishment. “It’s unjust to kill a person simply to send a message to other people who’ve yet to commit a crime. It is just to execute a person who deserves to be executed.” (Cromie, Zott 157) Until death penalty opponents can come up with reasons for America's worst convicted not to die, they’ll never win. “Abolitionists have assembled no convincing moral argument to distinguish the death penalty for retribution from conscription and war in the name of human freedom and dignity.” (Cromie, Zott 152) The death penalty is morally acceptable and a reasonable punishment for crimes that are “egregious and shocking.” (Cromie, Zott