ipl-logo

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Fptp

1341 Words6 Pages

Reflection - 2 " The present system has clearly broken down. The results produced are not fair to any party, nor to any section of the community. In many cases they do not secure majority representation, nor do they secure an intelligent representation of minorities. All they secure is fluke representation, freak representation, capricious representation. " This quote is a famous and popular statement made by Winston Churchill, the former Prime Minister of the UK. This statement is targeted on the FPTP (First-Past-The-Post), the general electoral system of the UK. This system is not only used in the UK, but also in most of the major and minor democratic countries across the world. The point at the issue is that FPTP is a faulty and vague electoral …show more content…

Michael states that there are only some fundamental ideas that can be implemented easily. Therefore, it does not necessarily need any costly process to administer it. Michael also states that FPTP allows the voters to strongly convey their individual opinions upon which candidate should be selected and which party should form the government. Not only the voters, but also the candidates have many advantages. The representative candidates have a chance to build up a link with his constituency, the geographical area and its people. It allows the people to have a clear choice between two major parties competing in the elections. William believes that there are more disadvantages of FPTP than its advantages. Ethically and theoretically, a candidate must gain the majority of preference from the people. He is the representative of the common people. So, it is essential for him to be preferred the majority of the voters. But FPTP does not follow this principle. FPTP also effectively gives rise to the concept of tactical voting. In this case, voters often tend to not vote for the candidate of their choice but they rather vote against the candidate they dislike the most. Therefore, the reflection of the result is often not actual. Moreover, FPTP does not allow the smaller parties to have a fair and healthy competition. It also denies any fair representation for them. Stephen agrees with William at …show more content…

A common understanding is reached: FPTP has both pros and cons. It can prove to be a successful system if it's reviewed and apprehended properly. Both sides have presented valid and logical pints during the discussion. But the agreeing side could have elaborated the details more precisely, such as describing how gerrymandering plays a vital role in FPTP, or what are the potential substitutions for FPTP. Most of the other points are significant and relevant. The agreeing side has produced some major points like the disability of FPTP to give rise to small political parties. In my opinion, FPTP is indeed a simple and effective electoral solution. But, it has a number of limitations. The participants have correctly discussed this issue and all agreed that the system needs some revision. My personal opinion might seem to be biased as I view this issue from the completely democratic viewpoint, where I strongly think that FPTP either needs to be abolished completely or it needs to adapt some qualities from other electoral systems. This is the only way to restore and maintain the democratic

Show More
Related
984 Words | 4 Pages

How do Jem and Scout change during the course of the novel? How do they remain the same? During the course of the novel, both Jem and Scout changed. Jem and his sister Scout are exposed to a lot of changes that in the end prompt them changing the way they perceive those around them and how life is in general.

Read More
1804 Words | 8 Pages

They are used in many different countries, would guarantee the President has full support of the people and it would eliminate the Electoral College, a system many view as old and outdated. Also, many countries who use direct elections with popular vote seem relatively happy with their design. Schlesinger has an important take on why direct elections would not function well in the U.S. “Direct-election proposals recognize that ideological and/or personalist parties would drain votes away from the major parties. Consequently, most direct-election proposals provide that, if no candidate receives 40% of the vote, the two top candidates would fight it out in a run-off” (Schlesinger 2000).

Read More
1369 Words | 6 Pages

Rush is not in favor of proportional representation because in order for a proportional representation to succeed other parts of the government need to change, and with those changes other things would sacrificed. There would be a ripple effect on the rest of the government if there was a switch to the PR system. Also with a PR system voters would have no choice whatsoever among the candidates they elect What factors limit third parties from winning an

Read More
1603 Words | 7 Pages

To What Extent Should the United States Restructure its Electoral College System? : States With the 2016 election in the books, the United States has elected a candidate that lost the popular vote by over two million votes. This is the second time in the twenty first century that this has occurred. In such a democratic nation, the ability to win the important office of the presidency without popular consent raises a few concerns about the two hundred and forty year old system. In a democracy, the voices of the states and their respective populations must be heard.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

It allows them to use tactics such as packing and cracking which can have a tremendous impact on elections. Packing is when politicians draw out district maps for each party based on population. Packing can swing the vote because the population of one party could out weight the population of the minority party within the same district, causing the entire district to swing with the majority. Voters feel that the other tactic, cracking, gives them a disadvantage because the political parties are being spread out between multiple districts which causes one district to have the majority party in multiple areas (King, Elizabeth). When the politicians of the party in power have drawn out the voters’ map, they maintain power over the lines of the map.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

34% is not the majority of the people, whereas 51% is. This detail highlights that if we were ever to transfer smoothly to a different system, a party would not be chosen particularly by the bulk of the citizens. This would create more disruption in the country, which is definitely not needed

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

By restraining the influence of the government on daily life, the United States will be able to return to the great nation of freedom; a nation in which its founding fathers so vehemently fought to build. Similarly, politics should not be controlled strictly according to political parties, and Coolidge urged people to support the values they believe in, not a certain political party. In today’s world, I think many politicians would benefit from acting in the way of doing the right thing, rather than supporting sides merely based on political affiliation. For this reason, I am passionate about educating myself as much as possible to candidates beliefs, and I look forward to being able to take part in my first elections in coming

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

Political parties hold far too much power in today’s election process and need to be abolished. Parties were originally only intended to serve as temporary coalitions for specifically controversial elections, and yet every election since the late 1700’s has been won by a specific party. The existence of political parties has had quite a few negative effects on America including the division of people, a lack of communication, and violence between opposing sides (U.S. History.org). The idea that political parties are dangerous is not a new concept.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

Factions and Federalist Essay No. 10 The federalist papers were a series of 85 essays written to convince the citizens of New York to ratify the constitution. Federalist essay No.10, written by James Madison, discusses political factions and their effects. Madison’s definition of a faction is clearly stated in the essay.

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

The main advantage is that it removes the concentration of power from one individual. This ensures that abuse of power is limited. Giving different individuals from varying parties will also result in the creation of checks and balances in the executive. A lieutenant governor from the Democratic Party will be able to check the activities and the undertakings of a Republican governor thus ensuring that they operate within the confines of the law and the powers of their office. Also, the system allows for the introduction or the enforcement of the manifestos held by both parties, thereby resulting in greater benefits to the population.

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

An effective government system protects the rights of its people and keeps its citizens safe from harm. The purpose of the government is to protect its citizens by securing the safety of them, and by providing for citizen 's needs. While other concerns, such as the economy and a less intrusive government may be present, a government 's duty is to provide for and protect its citizens. Without people 's concerns for how their needs will be provided or how they will be protected from a threat, the citizens will be able to live with a sense of security.

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

Research Paper On Democracy in Canada Name : Harpreet Kaur Introduction The word democracy describes a Political System of any country. Dramatic changes have taken place in recent Years at the national level with respect to the day today functioning of our constitutional democracy. In a Democratic country like Canada , America all the citizens that are eligible have the rights to participate directly or indirectly in decision making that affect them.

Read More
2506 Words | 11 Pages

INTRODUCTION The United States political structure is one of the most conducive and great political system in the world. One of the most popular aspects of it is the two party system, and the well-known Democratic and Republican parties. There are three major party systems in the world and they are one-party system, two-party system and multi-party system. This essay will analyse the two party system in the United States (U.S.), their structure and the benefits of a two party system in a states.

Read More
1692 Words | 7 Pages

The political party model then spread over many parts of Western Europe, including France and Germany, over the 19th century. Since then, they have become the most common political system in the world. In this essay, we will show how political parties are essential to ensuring democracy. We will also show that there are unavoidable negative consequences to the party system. One of the fundamental tenants of democracy is the

Read More
1456 Words | 6 Pages

Many people believe that the election plays the most important role in democracy. Because a free and fair election holds the government responsible and forces it to behave on voter's interest. However, some scholars find evidence that election itself is not enough to hold politicians responsible if the institutions are not shaping incentives in a correct way. In other words, the role of the election on democracy, whether it helps to serve the interest of the public or specific groups, depends on other political institutions. I

Read More

More about Advantages And Disadvantages Of Fptp

Related Topics

Open Document