ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The House Of Commons

777 Words4 Pages

The House of Commons is an iconic image of Canadian representative democracy. It is a body of elected Members of Parliament (MPs) through a system known as a single-member plurality. These MPs get together Monday to Friday and debate about new policies and policy reforms. On one side is the governing party which includes the Prime Minister and their cabinet along the front row of seats. Directly across would be the opposition, which consists of the other major parties that had obtained seats in the house of commons. Beyond the front seats are other members of the parties which do not have specialized roles in the cabinet.
When debating in the House of Commons each MP that wishes to speak stands to signal that they are interested in voicing their opinion, The Speaker will then address them and allow them to present what they have to say. However, MPs are required to speak to the Speaker and the speaker only, this is an attempt to keep the discussions held in house, civil. Once a bill is approved in the House of Commons it is reviewed by the Senate and either approved or returned to the House of Commons for improvements.
The purpose of this paper is to give empirical evidence to why the House of Commons should go through social and administrative reforms to make it not only a more cooperative system but a more open-ended means to federal change and …show more content…

Arguments have constantly been made for a more ‘representative and responsible’ government where backbenchers contribute their perspective without fear of losing their jobs. However, when backbenchers vote in opposition of their own party, the confidence in said party is questioned (Stilborn 2017). A loss of confidence inherently makes it more difficult for a governing party to make significant changes in bills and policies and in extreme cases can result in the party losing their governing

Show More
Related

The Pros And Cons Of Queensland's Unicameral System

510 Words | 3 Pages

This argument remains valid in modern debates as the absence of an upper house continues to severely restrict the possibilities by which legislation can be evaluated and amended (Costar 2015). Although it has been determined that the upper house alone is not the cure for attaining an answerable government, it is said that by re-introducing a second chamber in Queensland, a number of valuable functions can be performed. Functions such as the review of legislative proposals at a ministerial and departmental level as well as the control and limit of political power and the ability to protect human rights can be carried out in a way that is not possible alone by a lower house nominated by the government (Aroney 2008, 28). Not only does the upper house act as an extra technique to review and amend changes to legislature, it also has had a profound effect on the ability of the Queensland Parliament to correctly carry out its functions under the Constitution which compel it to act responsibly and review the undertakings of the executive arm of

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Canada Senate

1949 Words | 8 Pages

The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.

Read More

Comparing The Political Theorists Of Cox, And Mccubbins

1483 Words | 6 Pages

It is necessary to understand that although, it is the working of committees that creates legislation, it is the individual politician whom takes credit for it. As mentioned previously, party unity does not exist beyond the local level, and never has. Mayhew continues this with, “…Congress does not have to sustain a cabinet…” (p. 128). Members of Congress have no need to be cohesive, but can if they want to do so.

Read More

Studied Criticisms Of James Madison's Federalist 10

343 Words | 2 Pages

The representatives would be the voices of their constituents, leaving them with the responsibility of making decisions for the public good.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

982 Words | 4 Pages

It allows them to use tactics such as packing and cracking which can have a tremendous impact on elections. Packing is when politicians draw out district maps for each party based on population. Packing can swing the vote because the population of one party could out weight the population of the minority party within the same district, causing the entire district to swing with the majority. Voters feel that the other tactic, cracking, gives them a disadvantage because the political parties are being spread out between multiple districts which causes one district to have the majority party in multiple areas (King, Elizabeth). When the politicians of the party in power have drawn out the voters’ map, they maintain power over the lines of the map.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Monarchy In Canada

564 Words | 3 Pages

The monarchy in Canada is a continuous debate among the politicians and individuals. This paper aims to present the advantages and disadvantages of the monarchy in Canada. This way will enable us to take a clear position. First, Canadian politics are known for their divisive attitudes, and it is very hard to get consensus on decisions. The Queen plays the role of reference for the Canadian politicians and their decisions.

Read More

Erich Maria Remarque's All Quiet On The Western Front

1820 Words | 8 Pages

All Quiet on the Western Front Essay World War I is one of the most influential and bloody wars in history. Soldiers did not always receive fair treatment, and often encountered harsh conditions, especially those men who were fighting on the front line. World War I took place between 1914-1919 (pbs), during which millions of lives were lost, and nearly everyone’s life was touched by the war in some way.

Read More

How Does Paine Create A New American Government

562 Words | 3 Pages

Both houses are elected by the people and create laws based on what the people want. In the following paragraph the author explains that each government needs a

Read More

How To Abolish The Senate In Canada Essay

344 Words | 2 Pages

Canada has two legislative bodies in the parliamentary system, one is the Senate of Canada which is constituted by the appointed members. Secondly, is the House of Commons, which is made up of elected officials. The Senate is consisted of 105 members that are recommended by the Prime Minister and the appointed by the Governor General. The members of the Senate can be made up of business people, lawyers, doctors, hockey players, and many more, because of the variety of experience from the individuals of senators gives a better understanding of the people they represent and of the problems that Parliament must try to solve.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: We Should Keep The Senate In Canada

875 Words | 4 Pages

The Senate: “The upper chamber of Parliament where there are 105 members who are appointed until age 75 by the Crown on the advice if the prime minister.” (Rules of the Game pg 106)The original Senate that was created in 1867 had only originally 72 seats. It was created to counter balance representation population in the House of Commons, although in recent years the Senate has become to reinforce representation of groups that have often been underrepresented in parliament, examples; Aboriginals, visible minorities and women. There has been a huge debate’s on whether Canada should keep the Senate. The people all over Canada have mixed opinions on if we should keep the Senate or not.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Senate And House Of Representatives

545 Words | 3 Pages

The Senate and House of Representatives comprise the two chambers of the United States Congress. While both houses are representative bodies and jointly oversee the executive branch, both must approve all bills before the president, but both chambers have different roles according to the Constitution. The House of Representatives has 435 members apportioned to the house from across the United States. States with larger populations receive more seats within the house.

Read More

Advantages Of Voting In Canada

342 Words | 2 Pages

Which system of voting does Canada use? Canada uses a voting system called ‘First Past the Post’. The names comes from the sport of horse riding as in horse riding, the horse who passes the post first wins all. Same thing here, the party that wins majority of the ridings gets 100% of power.

Read More

Advantages Of The Westminster System Of Government

1131 Words | 5 Pages

The Westminster system of government comprises of a democratically elected lower house. After the executive members the head of government is the prime minister. The next system that falls in place is the opposition which is led by the leader of the party or the parties with the second largest number of seats in the lower house. It follows that in the British system the prime minister and the cabinets are fully in charge of Parliament.

Read More

Majority Rule Advantages And Disadvantages

1312 Words | 6 Pages

"Candidate with the highest number of the vote wins the right to represent the particular seat in the House of Commons", according to CBC news. There are some limitations regarding this method. First of all, it could possibly happen that candidate with less than half vote wins, which means it only reaches minority people's desired outcome. In addition to the tactical voting, the two-party system could be a serious problem. Since only the first matters, candidates with the low possibility to win may exist the election.

Read More

The Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Parliamentary Government

944 Words | 4 Pages

Parliamentarism, or a parliamentary government, is defined “as a system of government in which the executive, the government, is chosen by and is responsible to…the legislature.” (Gerring, Thacker and Moreno, 2005, p. 15) With this form of governmental control, many advantages and disadvantages arise, especially when this system is compared to the likes of ‘Presidential systems’ or even that of ‘Semi-presidential systems’. However, my aim within this essay is to, both, highlight to advantages of parliamentarism, and to also give my opinion as to why this system is better when compared and contrasted with the aforementioned systems. According to Hague and Harrop (2007, p. 336), there are three different branches relating to the parliamentary system. Firstly, the legislature and the executive are “originally linked”.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The House Of Commons

Related Topics

Open Document