ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The STOCK Act

1225 Words5 Pages

“The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen. by the People of the Several States,” which is clearly stated in the Constitution of the United States (U.S. Constitution art. 1 sec. 2). The adage of the adage. Senators are similarly elected by the people of the United States. Because they are elected by the people, Congress members have a moral duty to vote in the way their constituents would prefer and in a way that protects the interests of their constituents, especially if they want to be reelected. However, this moral duty becomes challenged when Congress members stand to gain financially from how they vote. The vast majority of Congress members own stock or investment funds, and they are currently free to trade those …show more content…

Because of these arguments, Senator Jon Ossoff has introduced a new bill, the Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act, which would require Congress members to place their stocks in a blind trust during their time in office so that they cannot trade with insider knowledge. Senator Ossoff states that the passing of this bill would require Congress members to be “focused on representing their constituents, not their stock portfolios” (Ossoff 2023). This is an idea that many supporters of a congressional stock trading ban agree with, as they believe that Congress people will do a better job representing the people who voted for them if they are not focused on trading individual stocks but rather have their stocks placed in an account that they have little knowledge …show more content…

One of these lawmakers is Nancy Pelosi, who argues that “we’re a free market economy” and that lawmakers “should be able to participate in that” (Mangan 2021). These lawmakers don’t want to be treated differently from normal citizens and argue that they should be allowed to own stocks. Those who oppose a ban on stock trading for Congress members believe that Congress members shouldn’t have their rights to participate in the American economy taken away just because of their position as lawmakers. Additionally, they argue that the STOCK Act provides enough protections against insider training, as it already requires that lawmakers report all stock trades, so if constituents disagree with how their Congress members are managing their stock portfolio, they can hold them accountable at election time. The STOCK Act also gives the SEC the power to investigate any cases of insider trading, which is a clear deterrent to insider trading. For these reasons, some members of the American public believe that the stock trading regulations already in place for Congress members are strong enough, and a further ban does not need to be

Show More
Related
614 Words | 3 Pages

Lee H. Hamilton, a former congressman in the House of Representatives, wrote, The Case for Congress, to share some of the criticisms he has heard over the years and to explain the effects of such opinions. Hamilton speaks of three main criticisms: “Congress is run by lobbyists and special interests”, “Congress almost seems to promote total gridlock”, and “There’s too much money in Politics” (Hamilton 2004). For each of these criticisms, Hamilton explains these thoughts and his opinion on the matter. The strongest point of Hamilton’s argument was in defending the lobbyists in Congress. Hamilton (2004) said the public opinion of lobbyists is that “Congress is manipulated by powerful wheel-dealers who put pressure on legislators and buy votes through extensive campaigns and other favors” (p. 83).

Read More
305 Words | 2 Pages

“Many good people serve in Congress. They are patriotic, hard-working and devoted to the public good as they see it, but the institutional and cultural impediments to change frustrate the intentions of these well-meaning

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

The Disclose Act of 2010, was one of the most polarizing pieces of legislation to be debated during the 111th Congress controlled by Democrats. Regardless of its polarizing nature, the act was able to pass the House, where it then was halted in the Senate due to the filibuster. The failure to pass S.3628 the Disclosure Act of 2010 in the Senate displays how much polarization can inhibit Congress, as well as the severity of the institutional frameworks that protect minority parties in the Senate. The Disclose Act of 2010 were pieces of legislation introduced by Democrats into both the House and Senate after the decision of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. 310, which ruled that “under the First Amendment corporate funding

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

Politicians who avoided taking strong positions on whether they were pro or anti-trust were seen as cowards who would rather cater to big business than ensure the welfare of citizens. However, politicians were also reluctant to take action because they were being influenced by these corporations. A political illustration that arose at this time titled “The Bosses of the Senate”, demonstrates the ease at which monopolists were able to influence political decisions - or lack thereof (Document 3). The illustration depicts several industries-copper, steel, oil, iron, and coal- as bags of money hovering over senators at their desks. During this era, monopolists were able to buy state legislatures, which directly appointed senators to congress, and controlled which senators were in office through bribery, intimidation, and threats.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

This essay will discuss the impact of lobbyist on legislation in Washington, DC and the amount of dollars spent to influence federal policies. Throughout a normal day in Washington DC, the hustle and bustle of lobbyist is taking place in the Capital building, White House and along K Street, which is the home of many of the lobbying firms. There are special interest groups, corporations and industries that hire in-house lobbyist or lobbyist firms to influence legislation to benefit their cause. For example, some of these causes may include, but are not limited to tax breaks, subsidies and changes to current regulations or laws.

Read More
2004 Words | 9 Pages

The United States Congress was created by the founding fathers for representatives voted by their constituents to create legislation and to keep the President in check for the betterment of the nation. Congress was seen as the heart and soul of democracy and many believed that congressmen listened to their problems and would enact change to help. Today, Congress is seen as corrupt, unproductive, and always promising, but never delivering. Several politicians have run for Congress saying they will end the corruptness and bring upon changes to end the unproductiveness. Unfortunately, Congress is still progressing at a slow grind.

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

Out of all of the political relationships between individuals which exist in the American political system, one of the most critical is that which exists between the lobbyist and legislator. To the average citizen, the foundation of America’s political process centers on the understanding, examination, and transfer of influence between politicians and representatives of public or private special interest groups. (Patterson, 2009) What is unseen by the average citizen is the multibillion dollar political industry developed by lobbyists for the benefit and information exchange on their special interests at the federal, state, county, municipal, and even local levels of government. The allure of lobbying at the federal level is because federal

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Congressional term limits have been what restricted the amount of time that anyone can work in office whether it be to a representative, senator, or even the president. People have debated over keeping or losing the term limits, since each come with their own benefits and faults at the same time. In the argument for term limits, some may argue that they are necessary because, “Congress will be more responsible toward their constituents because they will soon be constituents themselves” (Weeks). The validity in this statement proves to be one of the strongest arguments because the creation of laws is mean to serve all people, and if the people in office had complete immunity, it would serve unfair and unjust to the rest of society. For this reason, it always will make those in office consider how impactful and

Read More
1675 Words | 7 Pages

“The Revolving Door of Washington” is a long-standing trope of American politics by which legislators become lobbyists and vice versa. Whether it is Obama’s appointment of ex-Comcast lobbyist Tom Wheeler to chairmanship of the Federal Communcations Commission, or the immediate lucrative hire of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor by an investment bank that he had been regulating on the House Financial Services Committee, the symbiotic relationship of government and interest groups is not simply the result of a single 2010 court case. These findings are indicative that congressmen will not always do right by their district, and that many congressmen hold ulterior motives in their office, which points to the fact that the job performance of a federal legislator is not independent of interest groups or the manner in which lawmakers are elected. In this case, the manner in which the legislator is elected does play a role in how they legislate. If candidates were not burdened by the fundraising process, and were not permitted to take any money (directly or via Super- PAC) from interest groups, the focus of the election would dramatically switch.

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

Members of Congress rarely get along with their counterparts, and they often challenge those who vote against them and denounce each other publicly. More and more bills that are

Read More
1626 Words | 7 Pages

Elected officials must balance the wishes of the overall electorate, specific constituencies within the Congress, and their own ideology. The relative importance of those competing factors remains an open question (Levitt, 1996). According to Fenno legislators make their decisions based off of three primary goals: reelection, good public policy, and influence (Smith, et al., 2013). Mayhew argues that Fenno's first goal, reelection, is in fact the only goal. His reasoning is that congressional members are constantly scared or worried with the thought of losing the next election round.

Read More
1591 Words | 7 Pages

Consequences of Congressional Oversight The types of choices that congressman have to make when it comes to oversight are often moderated by the different costs and benefits from engaging in congressional oversight. In previous sections the way members make decisions on congressional oversight whether to exercise or which technique to use was discussed. McCubbins and Schwartz highlight how difficult this process is by distinguishing general neglect from congress versus rational behavior. Rationality in this area makes it so that members can actually perform their other functions, which have higher priority so they can keep their jobs (McCubbins and Schwartz 1984).

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

The House of Representatives are in charge of voting on different bills, without the knowledge of what’s going on, therefore they don't know what they are voting on. In the previous paragraph it was stated that there should be penalties for missing a certain amount of days of work. These

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

Even other senators can be subject to punishment for immorality. Unlike other magistracies, censors hold office for five years at a time. In our committee, a censor may initiate a vote to remove any of the other magistrates from office. When the censor moves to impeach, he or she will first need to declare the accused’s moral crimes to the dais.

Read More
440 Words | 2 Pages

Congress is broken into two parts, House of Representative and a Senate. The House of Representative follows the people’s concerns and works to resolve it. The Senate is in place to keep the peace when there is a debate and to bring up ideas

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The STOCK Act

Open Document