In hopes of having a successful health care system, the United States spends the most on health care but the quality of medical treatment and success is inferior to other countries. Although other countries provide health care at a reasonable cost to their citizens, challenges are still prevalent in their system. Challenges arise when medical treatment is provided to all citizens regardless if the patient has the means to pay for their care. From a humanity perspective, health care is a basic human right, but from an economic and business perspective it is impossible to provide care to
I believe as a society we have moral obligation to provide healthcare to all the citizens of our nation. How would that become possible is the question? No matter what we choose as the solution to this problem, there will always be pros and cons. I think the answer is socialized medicine. Can a country like the US have socialized medicine?
Developed countries around the world have embraced the universal healthcare, with America being the only exception. Access to healthcare is considered one of the most important things for the progress of a country. However, many people in America consider that the healthcare system in the country is quite inefficient. It is estimated that more than 45 million Americans have no medical insurance.
The universal healthcare system was an idea created by the government to create a health care system that is easier for people to manage financially. It was a way for them to improve health care services and the amount of people that receive these health care systems. This idea was a way for people who are less fortunate to get the types of health services that they need and deserve. This Idea brought up a lot of controversy with the people, some thought that having this system was going to improve America and its services, but it also had a negative affect for some people, who thought that it was going to make the united states more bankrupt than it already was.
Universal healthcare is a threat to the American people, it restricts doctors, restricts government spending, and ruins free market principles; therefore, to restore the trust of the American people, congress needs to abolish government mandated healthcare. With the political season fully underway, universal healthcare and healthcare legislation is a hot topic. Many politicians will promise Americans social and financial programs that without digging deeper seems to be a great idea. Yet what this politicians don't disclose is that these policies are detrimental to American citizens. Government mandated healthcare is one of these policies.
In America, universal healthcare would diminish principles important to the functioning of society; specifically, it would diminish individual liberty, free enterprise and free markets, and the right to life. In as much as the government bureau mandated by universal healthcare makes decisions concerning the health ways and medical treatment of individual Americans, it diminishes individual liberty. The purpose of
America is recognized as a flourishing first world country, having a GDP ranked #1 at $19,417.144 (in billions). (List of Countries by Projected GDP) Back in 2016, the Common Wealth Fund Survey reported the United States to be the worst among 11 developed nations in healthcare despite holding the most expensive system. A common thing found in the Unites States is that adults are more likely to go without any healthcare even under the Affordable Care Act which expanded insurance coverage. (Osborn, Squires and Doty)The United States spent around a whopping17.5% of its GDP towards healthcare.
I propose that moving towards a more universal health care system will have a great impact on our country. It will have advantages and even some disadvantages, but the benefits will outweigh the costs. In 1993 president Clinton advocated for a universal health care system to lower the medicare budget, but the proposal received a lot of backlash. Hospitals, doctors, and insurance companies did not favor the universal health care system so much that it was not able to get pass congress (Film: Obama’s Deal). When the Affordable Care Act was implemented during President Obama’s presidency it did improve certain aspects of the United States healthcare system however, it had too many exceptions to be truly universal.
Moreover, there are strong financial justifications for universal healthcare. Evidence demonstrates that universal healthcare can result in long-term cost savings for both individuals and the government, dispelling the myth that it is not financially viable. For example, compared to the United States, nations with universal healthcare systems frequently spend less per person on healthcare and get better health outcomes. America may achieve overall cost reduction and increased efficiency by promoting preventative care, negotiating cheaper drug prices, and streamlining administrative costs by implementing a universal healthcare model (Kahn & McDonough, 2018). III.
The United States is the only Western nation that does not authorize free health services to its people. The cost of healthcare to the uninsured is beyond prohibitive, and insurance plans are far more captivated with profit costs, rather
In my opinion, there are different types of "universal health care". There is 'real' universal health care where the government employs all of the medical personnel and owns the medical facilities. This system ensures coverage to everyone, but limits choices.
As Bernie Sanders once said, “Health care must be recognized as a right, not a privilege.” Most developed countries choose to live by this quote while the United States of America chooses to go against it. Universal health care has benefits on multiple levels, whether it’s a single individual or the people in a whole. The U.S is one of the few developed countries that doesn’t offer universal health care to their people, yet the U.S spends more than seventeen percent of their GDP on health insurance. Many people believe that universal health care is a simple one solution problem, but the truth is that there are multiple forms of universal health care that provide all citizens with the health insurance they need.
Although the United States is the only developed country in the world which fails to provide its citizens basic universal healthcare, it is unlikely that a change to socialized medicine would be an easy one to implement. The United States of America was founded in order to escape a large centralized government, which created a society that is distrustful of government and clutches dearly to personal freedoms. The American public associates the idea of socialized medicine with centralizing power and taking away personal liberties, and thus becomes associated with tyranny, undertaking a negative connotation. Moreover, American Conservatives would vehemently oppose the increase in taxes such a system would impose upon the American public, and many argue that regulation would decrease the quality of care that the private sector provides. Additionally, on a deeper level, American society functions on the idea of meritocracy, believing that one's hard work will be enough to provide and take care of themselves.
Universal health care should definitely be a reality for all, even children with disabilities. First of all, it is called universal healthcare, as it is a “health care system in which ALL residents of a geographic or political entity have their health care paid for by the government, regardless of medical condition.” So what sets children with disabilities aside and makes them different? Are they not counted as part of that population and if not, why is it that? After all, it is a health care system designed for all residents, regardless of medical condition.
In Aaron E. Carroll’s and Austin Frakt article, “The Best Health Care System in the World: Which One Would You Pick?”, both authors compare different healthcare systems, pointing out the advantages and disadvantages of each. In the article, Canada, Britain, Singapore, Germany, Switzerland, France, Australia, and the US were compared. Through further description of who provided the most immediate care for the lower price, Switzerland or France were chosen to have the best health care. Both countries authorize universal health care, which mandates each citizen residing in that country to take up a health plan, whether it be public or private. Switzerland has built off the Affordable Care Act of the United States, which provides access to most doctors and treatments for a fairly low price.
