The Court, in a decision written for the majority by Justice Byron White, said that the use of deadly force against a fleeing suspect is not always unconstitutional. Deadly force can be used if there is probable cause that the fleeing suspect poses a serious threat to the officer or
How do police decide how much force should be used in a situation and how has that changed throughout the year? Has Tennessee v. Garner been effective in protecting individuals against excessive force? Before the case Tennessee v Garner in 1985, how to police decided if they should use deadly force determined by one of four groups; these four groups were The Any-felon Rule; The defense-of-life Rule; The Forcible Felony Rule, and The Model Penal Code. The extreme one was the Any-Felony Rule which was “English common law authorized officers to use any means necessary to arrest felony suspects or prevent them from fleeing. In the United States, courts interpreted this rule as legal permission to shoot an unarmed felony suspect in flight” (Tennenbaum)
Why do US police keep killing unarmed black men? US police is under a serious controversy after the recent killings of Afro-American men; one in Tursa and another in Charlotte. Police is trying their best to defend their action of shooting the two men down and in this scenario, they have failed to cover the unjustifiable fatal killing of Terrance Crutcher in Tursa as the video of the killing has been aired on news channels which mirrors the reality of an innocent unarmed black man who despite of following the commands of the police, was shot to death. This is inexcusable and a true case of excessive force.
Why is an assault weapon so unsafe to the public? The guns are made perilous in the minds of individuals, for it's the characters who control the guns. The nation's security will be protected if the sales harmful weapons were organized. There have been cases where people were in possession of the weapons were a threat to others. The dangers of the weapons will flourish if the obstacles aren't dealt with.
Minnesota Duluth Police Department: The DPD suggests that use of deadly force is justified in the following scenarios: to keep peace officers or others, safe from death or great bodily harm, to make an arrest of someone who is believed to have committed a felony and use or threatened deadly force, or to make an arrest of someone who is attempting to commit a felony and the officer believes the person may use deadly force if he/she is not captured. Furthermore, use of deathly force towards a moving vehicle is only reasonably used when there is no way to avoid the threat of a vehicle or deadly force coming from the vehicle with other means. Minneapolis Police Department: The MPD has the same three scenarios of when to use deadly force, which include: to keep peace officers safe, or others; safe from death or great bodily harm; to make an arrest of someone who is believed to have committed a felony and use or threatened deadly force; or to make an arrest of someone who is attempting to commit a felony and the officer believes the person may use deadly force if not captured. In their policy, MPD goes on to talk about the Tennessee vs Garner case which states that: warning shots should not be fired, the use of several objects may constitute use of deadly force, the policy does not prevent officers
The police officer could have solved the situation in a hasty manner. Using deadly force is obligated on occasions such as self-defense or protecting other individuals from danger. Police officers have to make quick decisions, but they should know if it's correct or
The fleeing felon rule is when the police are chasing a felony suspect and he or she is fleeing from the scene. The officers are allowed to use force to stop the fleeing suspect, that includes the use of deadly force. However, deadly force can only be used if the officer has probable cause to believe that suspect would be a threat to the community. Force can be used by the victim, bystanders, and officers, but, deadly force can only be used by the officers.
On October 1, 2017, Stephen Paddock, a former real estate investor, shot and killed 58 and injured an additional 422 at a concert in Las Vegas. His weapons of choice? 22 different assault rifles (Standard Reports). Assault rifles like Paddock’s are fairly easy to buy in our current society; you just have to have a driver’s license, a background check, and a proof of sale document. Not only are assault rifles easy to buy, there are a large amount of them, more than three million to be exact (Zremski).
Throughout the past decades, every time you turn on CNN or your local news channel, they’re talking about shootings involving police. Police use of deadly force is the amount of force that could cause injury or bodily harm to a person. Police use of deadly force is a controversial topic that has been towering over the news stations and radios lately with different shooting insistences. Many concerns have been brought up as to why this topic is controversial and problematic. In result, many court cases have addressed this issue.
If the law enforcement were to reduce the amount of force the officers are allowed to use, crime would simply be even more out of control. I say because if the officer can 't get control the suspect will easily take advantage of the officer. The current amount of force an officer can use is efficient, for the this reason the police officers have to right to protect themselves along with the community. The law allows police officers to use deadly force if
For decades now, the controversy over deadly force has continued to show up in the news when police officers have acted in a manner that some citizens find just while others deem completely unfair. Many lawsuits stemming from shootings and crimes have found their way to local courts or the Supreme Court to deal with this issue. A portion of the U.S. population finds deadly force unnecessary when non-lethal weapons such as pepper spray or batons just as easily subdue the criminal. In addition, these citizens argue that officers might be liable for cases filed against them if they use excess force on people that seem suspicious but have not actually committed a crime. On the other hand, the opposing argument in favor of deadly force states that
The public has a misconception that deadly force is the same thing as excessive force. They can be similar if the police use deadly force to a point where every officer discharges their entire magazine on person when the threat has been eliminated. Officers receive hours of training on how to shoot a gun, but sometime receive little instruction on how to determine when to use the gun. Training starts in the Police Academy, and continues throughout their careers. There are officers who teach and train the departments every month.
Police officers may need to use deadly force in certain situations when they are trying to enforce the law These police officers are people that risk their lives every day for people they don't even know. Many times these criminals are using deadly forces against them. The public needs to know they are safe. Police should possess weapons of deadly force. Instead of using deadly force, use of non- lethal weapons like tasers or tranquilizers allow a criminal to be taken in for questioning which could be positive in some situations.
