ipl-logo

The Purpose Behind The Sykes-Picot Agreement

1389 Words6 Pages

an agreement known as the Sykes-Picot Agreement. The purpose behind the Sykes-Picot Agreement was to segregate various provinces that originally belonged to the Ottoman Empire which would enable them to split power over each section. When the war was over a new group of nations were convinced by Britain and France would gain and dictate power and” to grant them the quasi-colonial over the former Ottoman territories” (Middle East Research and Information Project, 2016) . This ended up being the antecedent to what is now recognized as the United Nations, the establishments of the British and French were called the mandates. A mandate over Syria was reached by France in effort to section Lebanon as an individual state that would consist of mainly …show more content…

Also, the hostility increased between the British troops and the Zionists militias. As a result Britain decided to hand over the mandate to the Palestine, but they requested the United Nations be allowed to make any future decisions about the country. However, British government secretly hoped that a solution would not be formulated which would force them to give Palestine back and allowing them to a United Nation trusteeship. The situation was examined and evaluated by a United Nation committee of representatives; the result was a bit unexpected and it was decided that Palestine should be divided in effort to appease the Arabs and the Jews. By the mid-1940s over one million Arabs called Palestine home and over six hundred thousand Jews lived on the borders of the Mandated Palestine. In doing so, the Jews had bought and settled around seven percent of Palestine. By the end of 1947, the voted sided with portioning Palestine into two states. One state would be Jewish and the other portion would be for the Arabs. Although the Jewish portion was a little bigger than the Arabs portion and excluded Jerusalem, due to the likelihood of Jews immigrating to there, Jerusalem and Bethlehem would be recognized as a international region. The Zionist leadership welcomed the partition, but they intended it would increase the boundaries of the Jewish state. However, the plan was not accepted by the Palestinian Arabs who seen the vote as an international treacherous act. They felt the Jews received too much territory. The conflict between the Jews and the Arabs commenced only days after the partition plan was

Show More
Related
236 Words | 1 Pages

The tension started to rise between the two, since the people of the Ottoman empire grew angry about having to leave their own country, because of the Balfour Declaration. However, the population of Israelis in Palestine

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

Creation of Israel in 1948 Jews had to leave Israel in the first place because they were forced from their homes by the Roman Empire. When the Jews returned to Israel in 1948, Palestinians were still living there. The return of the Jews was a problem because it caused war to break out between the Arabs and Israelis. Wars between the two are still occurring today.

Read More
309 Words | 2 Pages

In 1917, the British defeated the Ottomans and occupied Palestine . This promise was later incorporated into the mandate that was granted to Britain by the League of nations in 1922. During their mandate from 1922 to 1948, the British found that their contradictory promises to Jews and Palestinian Arabs were difficult to reconcile. The Zionists envisioned opening emigration on a large-scale and some spoke of a Jewish state encompassing all Palestine.

Read More
225 Words | 1 Pages

In November of 1917 a resolution calling for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. This resolution caused anger amongst Arab community they believed Palestine would be a free Arab State. This declaration was made for one to influence US Jewish businessmen in supporting war. The Jewish population continued to support Russian involvement,

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

Israel gained its territory in wars but a big part of it was from the six-day war in 1967 where Israel conquered the east bank including Jerusalem from Jordan, Gaza strip and Sinai from Egypt (after a few years they gave it back to Egypt in order to have peace), and the Golan Heights from Syria (HISTORY: The State of Israel). The idea of a Jewish country was formed a long time before the Holocaust happened, due to the Holocaust the U.N, which made the decision of creating the country, agreed to the idea because of the discrimination of Jews. As a result, they thought that they deserved a country of their own. Since Israel was formed it participated in seven wars and two Intifadas.

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

Many Jews started to immigrate to this land from Africa and Europe because these Jew felt that they belonged to this land to fulfill the biblical prophets. These Jews go to Palestine, but people are already there, and the Arabs do not like this. In World War 1, the British came into the Palestine and fight the Ottoman Empire after this the British claim this land. They control this land till WW2. The British adopts the Belford declaration, which states that the British are going to support the declaration of a Jewish state in 1917.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

In the following day, the armies of four Arab countries, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Jordan, launched the 1948 Arab-Israeli war in order to prevent the establishment of the Jewish state. After a year of fighting a ceasefire was declared. The people of Israel were banding

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

Israel is a sign of the Jewish transformation from helpless to self independence. '' Three times a day they prayed for the restoration of Jerusalem... These problems will not arise if a home be found for them which will be legally recognized as Jewish” ( Source G). The Jewish people went from praying for the restoration of their nation to being given one recognized as a Jewish state. They were given an opportunity to rebuild themselves, their families, and their religion in a new peaceful country long dreamed of. "...shown during two thousand years of appalling and suffering… the new Jewish state, with its superior institutions had become a reality” ( Source D ).

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

While some may argue that the Palestinians and Israelis can coexist in one unified nation with a parliamentary government, history shows that conflict would most likely arise and this theoretical government would struggle with equality. One of the more obvious reasons a two state solution would be the most promising for ending conflict, would be the taming of Israel’s ability to overpower Palestine. According to a set of maps of Israel and Palestine, beginning before 1948 when the territory was 100% Palestinian, over the course of 20 years, Palestine was completely overpowered and eradicated by Israel to the point where only 12% of Palestine remains(Document 1). Through the use of military power and strong alliances, Israel has asserted the idea that if both groups were asked to share the area of land, Israel would assert dominance and overthrow Palestine once more. In a two state solution, both countries would be separated into different lands, and conflict such as this in the past would be avoided.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

Conflict between Israel and Palestine has been going on since 1948. When Israel was created. Bill Clinton is on Israel’s side because he thinks that they deserve the lands that used to belong to them. But he did not want war to start. Because they gave the Jews there rightful lands.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Their culture and language were different. Yet, they were still Jews. The Jews of the East had a long history that was ever present in the land of Palestine. However, the Jews of the West did not have that history.

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Following World War II, European Jews were in need of a place to settle without fear of persecution. In 1947, United Nations divided the British-owned Palestine into an Israeli and an Arab state, giving the Jewish people a place to settle, in their historical home land. Israel declared itself a state in 19481, thus beginning an Arab-Israeli conflict that still exists today. To fully appreciate the complexities of the Arab-Israeli conflict, it is important to understand geographical influences, the history since 1947, and the issues that perpetuate the conflict. The first factor to consider the geographical tension surrounding the Arab-Israeli Conflict.

Read More
1331 Words | 6 Pages

Controversy On 4 June 1967 following the end of the Six Day War, Israeli forces established control over areas that were administered by both Jordan and Egypt. These areas, now referred to collectively as the Occupied Territories of Palestine (OTP), remained under Israeli military rule until 1981. The following year, a civil administration was created and managed by the armed forces. The controversy within the West Bank is the fact that some initiatives and actions conflict with international law and human rights.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

When it comes to justifying what an individual perceives as moral, there are several different ethical theories that provide perspectives as to how situations are evaluated. These theories look at the consequences of the actions, what the agent’s intentions are, and whether the individual is being used as a means to end (May, 2014). Two of the founding theories of ethics are the utilitarian and deontological approaches which are demonstrated through the trolley scenario. While the best option would be to divert to a track with no one tied to it, a utilitarian would pull the switch to lead the trolley down the track to where there was only one person.

Read More
1316 Words | 6 Pages

Ben Gurion states the essential problem in Israel/Palestine: “we and they want the same thing: We both want Palestine. And that is the fundamental conflict.” (Shlaim, 2001, p. 18) For both Israelis and Palestinians it is nationalist conflict, there is a clear reason in the action of both parties, a territorially secure state. Yet, both Israel and Hamas seem to accept that negotiation is the eventual end through which to meet their nationalist ends (Hroub, 2006; Shlaim, 2001).

Read More

More about The Purpose Behind The Sykes-Picot Agreement

Related Topics

Open Document