The concept of race as biology is a unique topic, because while scientists have disproven the idea altogether, it is still believed to be truth for the majority of the population. Education is the only way to combat this idea, yet it is rarely mentioned in any classes predating college. Even then, the myth is often left to be debunked by humanities or social sciences, rather than in biological or genetics classes where it makes the most sense to be discussed. The ideal that race is a biological construct has played into racists ideals, and justification of segregation and discrimination, for centuries. If, as a society, we are to make progress on the lessening of the institution of racism, there needs to be a push towards understanding of the …show more content…
The text discusses the fact that there are more differences within a race of humans than there is between the various races, which is true. The data is slightly older, stating that between humans from different areas or supposed races have around a 4.62% variability of genes (Graves, 2004). The data today suggests that humans actually have considerably lower genetic variability, with unrelated humans being genetically different at an average rate of 0.09%, which may actually be an overestimate (Weinig, 2016). To put that in perspective, humans and some ape species are 1.3% different; some corn, within a single species, has a genetic variability of 1.42% (Weinig, 2016). So while I agree with the ideas and arguments presented in the article, there is less than one fourth the genetic variability that is stated in the article. Within the Homo sapiens species, it is also eye-opening to note that we have about half the genetic uniqueness of corn. Most of this is accounted for by the improvement of genome sequencing technology over the past decade. While there is no genetic basis to race, there certainly are biology benefits to having different skin color in different