The Radical Idea Of Marrying For Love Analysis

935 Words4 Pages

In Stephanie Coontz “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love,” she starts the excerpt with a quote from George Bernard Shaw describing marriage in a rather interesting way. Marriage is a institutior that brings together two people “under the influence of the most violent, most insane, most delusive, and most transient of passions.” As described throughout the book the history of marriage through past cultures around the globe, it is easily reasoned that these cultures used marriage on the basis of practicality rather than romance. In fact, as opposed to the type of romantic love marriages that are prominent through the modern Western culture, many of these cultures from the East and West rather found romance to be condescending to society and …show more content…

This is very apparent with an increasingly ongoing trend in the United States are marriage like relationships known as unmarried couple cohabitation have been on the rise, while marriage has been on the decline. In this modern society, this is the relationship is a forestep of marriage that usually is a result of romantic love. The reason why this trending is that people are able to accept the romantic aspect of relationship without dealing with the practical consequences that come with marriage. The benefits of this is that people are able to “test the waters” more, where when as the romantic aspect of their relationship gradually decreases, the couple have time to test out whether they can actually have practical considerations for each other in accordance to society. Married couples in today’s the United States enjoy a variety of practical benefits provided by the couple’s federal and state government financially and socially. The couples can receive unlimited marital tax deductions, where financial assets can be transferred to the spouse anytime free of taxes, including estates. They can also file their taxes jointly to benefit them from paying more taxes than they need to. Some other significant benefits include those from the Individual Retirement Account, Social Security, and health insurance packages. When …show more content…

If one were to do this, the kingdom may actually be in jeopardy, as an action like is unacceptable for familial ties and disrupt the family line. The primary consequence behind this sort of marriage is that those marrying are primarily doing it for the royal bloodline without any regards to their appeal to love to those that they may want to marry. Nevertheless, the benefits of these societies to marry based on practicality heavily outweigh the benefits if one were just to marry on