More handpicked essays just for you.
Rape myths essay
Sociological artice analysis about sexual assault on college campuses
Sociological artice analysis about sexual assault on college campuses
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rape myths essay
A few short months following the rape, Brzonkala filed a complaint against the respondents under Virginia Tech’s Sexual Assault Policy. During the conducted hearing at Virginia Tech, Morrison confessed to having sexual contact with Christy, even though she had told him “no.” twice. With much consideration, Virginia Tech’s
On May 12, 2013 a Sydney man Mr Lazarus was accused of raping an 18 year old woman in an alley outside his father’s nightclub. This case caused discussion about NSW sexual consent laws. This case clearly highlights the effectiveness and some major flaws of the legal system. During the first jury trial in NSW District Court Mr Lazarus was convicted for rape without sexual consent and resulted in a maximum of five-year prison sentence. After serving in prison for 11 months the Court of Criminal Appeal conducted a second trial for the case which resulted in an acquittal as Judge Tupman claimed that Mr Lazarus truly did believe that Ms Mullins did consent which is a crucial element of the offence of sexual intersource without consent.
The R.v. Ewanchuck (1999) case is a case that shook the Canadian criminal justice system and is considered by feminists a victory because the judge’s decision reflected rape myths and the case is being praised with addressing rape myths in the criminal justice system. The details of the case are; Ewanchuck invited a 17 year- old woman into his van for a job interview ( Dumont, 1999, p. 102-109). After the job interview concluded, Ewanchuck insisted that the woman see his paintings, which were in a trailer behind the van ( Dumont, 1999, p. 102-109). Ewanchuck then took the woman inside the trailer and began to make a series of sexual advances ( Dumont, 1999, p. 102-109).
In the case of R v. Ewanchuk many issue surrounding the use of rape myths allowed for Ewanchuk to justify the reasons for him sexually assaulting the young women. This begins with a harmless interview for the 17 year old women who is applying for a job for Ewanchuk’s woodworking business where they were scheduled for an interview in his van, which then Ewanchuk who is interviewing her suggests they go back to his trailer “to show her some of his work.” Once they got into the trailer that is when Ewanchuk initiates multiple incidents of him grabbing her where ever touch is more intimate. The women tells him multiple times to stop, but he doesn't and she fears that if she fights back it would provoke a violent response. The women contacts the
[7] In his book, “Missoula,” John Krakauer analyses the issue of rape in the college town of Missoula. Krakauer begins his work by quoting the article False Allegations of Sexual Assault: Rape is unique. No other violent crime is so fraught with controversy, so enmeshed in dispute and in the politics of gender and sexuality… And within the domain of rape, the most highly charged area of debate concerns the issue of false allegations. For centuries, it has been asserted and assumed that women “cry rape,” that a large proportion of rape allegations are maliciously concocted for purposes of revenge or other motives.
During Anne Munch’s presentation of “Rape Myths on Trial” she talked everything about rape, the things that factor into it, how the victim and the suspect aren't alone in the case, and how it affects college students. It really did not affect me, but I know people who have dealt with this situation so it was kind of hard to listen to. I also am in college and attend parties too; the statistics and hearing the phone call from someone who is about my age was scary. Anne Munch’s main point was that no means no. If you don’t want to have sex with someone then you don’t have to, but if they force themselves upon you and hurt you.
Article Presentation Kathleen Harris and Alison Crawford (2015) wrote article in relation to, Robin Camp, a federal Canadian court judge, who was adjudicating a sexual assault case involving a 19-year-old women in Calgary, AB in 2014. During the victim’s testimony, Judge Camp asked the 19-year-old women “why she could not just keep her knees together” and “why didn’t you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he couldn’t penetrate you” (Crawford & Harris, 2015). These statements spark issues with the public and our judicial system. Due to this statement, Judge Camp has received many complaints, as well as, under review for his behaviour from the council.
Michael M. vs Superior Court is the case that brought gender-neutrality in the criminal justice system to the light. Before this case was presented to the court, few states had adopted a gender-neutral statutory rape case and California, where the case took place, was not among them. The defense argued that California’s rape laws went against the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Then there was case of Mary Kay Letourneau, a former schoolteacher that was engaging in a sexual relationship with her 12 year old student. Letourneau was sentenced to 6 moths in jail while Michael M. received 10 years.
Cathy Young, in her article titled “Feminists want us to define these ugly sexual encounters as rape. Don’t let them,” takes up the claim that the definition of, and by consequence social and legal ramifications for “rape” has extended past the scope of reason. Young explored her claim by providing examples of personal sexual encounters she has had with various men, and how she does not feel as though these men should be thrown under the bus, where modern feminists would be quick to the task. She goes on to describe the ways in which possible counter arguments are flawed logically. Young takes up an opposing viewpoint to an increasingly popular feministic mantra in order to convince those unconvinced or unfamiliar with third-wave feminism that
Limited emphasis is placed on consent between parties,
The subject of this article is the importance of consent. Newman’s main argument is that consent should be taught at a young age. She believes this will help the rape and sexual assault rate. Each person has the right to make their own decisions, on what they choose to
In society and college campuses, sexual assault occurs quite frequently. According to an estimation one third of women experience a forced sexual experience at least once in their life and most of the time it occurs in colleges. Men have also been reported to be victim of sexual assaults mostly by other men. Most of the time the sexual assault is planned and perpetrated by a third person, who is known to the victim of incident. Drug and alcohol use play role in this issue and contribute to the problem as most of the time the victim and perpetrators are under the effect of alcohol or any other drug during the incident.
American culture in the 1970’s witnessed a pivotal shift in the public understanding of sexual violence. The second wave feminist movement brought about the first public discussions of rape as a personal experience and a widespread social problem. Modern understanding and modes of criticism of rape largely stem from this moment that publicized issues, which previously had been private matters. Before this time, since there had been no public discourse concerning sexual violence there could be no widespread ideological development.
We must first define what consent is. There are many different ways the definition of consent is used, but in regards to the law, consent is voluntary agreement to another person or
There are ambiguities in the definitions of everything common enough to be defined. The definition of ‘a scratch’ is used liberally by a teenager parking for the first time, as is the definition of ‘noticeable’ when their BFF has a pimple. The way we define a crime as serious as rape shouldn’t be nearly as dubious. As it is, organizations have been vocalizing that same sentiment for forty-two years of the eight decades it took the FBI to change it (Klein 183). The past definition categorizes rape as “the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will.”
