ipl-logo

The Case Of Judge Robin Camp

942 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Gender inequality in the justice system

Article Presentation Kathleen Harris and Alison Crawford (2015) wrote article in relation to, Robin Camp, a federal Canadian court judge, who was adjudicating a sexual assault case involving a 19-year-old women in Calgary, AB in 2014. During the victim’s testimony, Judge Camp asked the 19-year-old women “why she could not just keep her knees together” and “why didn’t you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he couldn’t penetrate you” (Crawford & Harris, 2015). These statements spark issues with the public and our judicial system. Due to this statement, Judge Camp has received many complaints, as well as, under review for his behaviour from the council. Alison Crawford (2017) wrote another article relating to Judge Robin Camp stating …show more content…

This concept is very important in Canadian law as we do not want to send an innocent individual to jail. Judges follow guidelines and policies which are set in place, but they also use their discretion when formulating whether the individual is deemed guilty or innocent. In this case, the Judge found the accused not guilty of the offence, which demonstrates ignorance or lack of understanding regarding the law with sexual assault.
19-year-old Victim The victim values justice; she wants justice for the horrendous act which she endured. This concept also relates to safety and security. She wants to be able to feel safe and secure within our society. After this decision, will she trust in the criminal justice system again? It is hard to determine as she trusted our system to protect her, and it failed.
Judicial Council They value to uphold the current standards and societal norms. They also want their Judges to be current and knowledgeable on Canadian law, so they can use more empirical or factual evidence to help them stay neutral.
Identifying Possible Moral Dilemmas
Judge Robin Camp As a Judge, there job is to ensure the accused is held accountable for their actions, but ensuring there is enough evidence to prove they committed the crime. With the combination of proving one is innocent until proven guilty, and the ignorance for the law can be a reason for this judges …show more content…

A major issue is ignorance and misconduct should not be an excuse for an acquittal. Secondly, the Judge followed outdated stereotypes which is deemed unacceptable and does not align with the current Canadian values. Lastly, the questions Judge Camp asked, insinuated that the 19-year-old victim could have prevented the rape.
19-year-old Victim An ethical issue this raised is should victims of crime testify in court. By testifying in court there is a high chance a victim become re-victimized due to reliving the experience. Even though the victim understands this possibility, as a judge should they be able to ask questions directly to the victim.
Judicial Council An ethical issue this situation exposes is whether our Canadian judges are trained appropriately and are held accountable. It is important there is a sense of balance between the public and the criminal justice system.
Resolution
For this situation of misconduct, a solution using the ethical systems maybe ethics of care. Ethics of care focuses more on the needs of an individual rather than their rights (Pollock, 2015). In this case, if Judge Camp focused more on the needs of the 19-year-old, building the relationship, as well as, some empathy may have changed the result of this situation. Even if it does not change the result, this ethical system would have raised different

Show More
Related
241 Words | 1 Pages

As with the previous trial, the “intent of purpose” comes into effect here. Each person had a slightly different role in acquiring their case, but it still falls under the same offense. They were both charged with sexual assault of a minor, and received due punishment. In conclusion, my experience of

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

In September of 1961, a woman from District of Columbia had an intruder break into her apartment. While the invader of the home was there, they had taken her wallet, and also raped the woman. During the investigation of the crime, the police had found some latent fingerprints in the apartment. The police then established and processed the prints. The prints were then connected back to 16 year old Morris A. Kent.

Read More
1405 Words | 6 Pages

The Top Five Canada (Justice) v. Khadr Do you think the charter should always apply to the activities of the Canadian government officials exercising functions outside Canada? I concur with the Federal court's findings in that, The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were created to protect the rights and freedoms of Canadian citizens in Canada. Outside of Canada, citizens are protected by international laws between sovereign states. Therefore, crimes committed in other judicial sanctions should be dealt with by their own court of law, without interference of other countries sovereignty. The case of R. v. Cook is an exception; Canadian authorities interrogated Cook, a Canadian citizen, outside of Canada.

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

In the case of Tara Brown’s murder, various groups of individuals are affected. As well as maintaining principles of fair punishment and deterrence, the criminal justice system has to consider perceptions of the victim’s family (secondary victim), the community’s demand for crime prevention, and the offender’s rights to a fair court hearing. The most likely outcome is imprisonment for Lionel John Patea due to committing an indictable offence. It is important to note that if this was only a case of domestic abuse without murder, it would utilise more time, effort and expenses to come to a resolution. This is due to the different circumstances and degree of abuse that the judge has to assess.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

Justice Cromwell and Chief Justice McLachlin perceived this case through a distinctive approach as compared to the majority. As an alternative of viewing the trial as a whole, they decided to concentrate on the functions of the jury which include, representing the community, presenting a protective barrier against unfair/harsh laws, and performing as informative means of the criminal justice system (Pinder, 2015). Without these factors, the trial would be deemed as unfair as the jury is viewed as the foundation of the trial and every matter follows accordingly (2015 SCC 28, para. 24). Cromwell and McLachlin stated the only means of exactly determining if the province abided by section 11(d) of the Charter is to evaluate the Province’s conduct considering the situation and how they tried to recognize the problem – if any. The Justices concluded there was an appropriate link relating the Province’s manner and the absence of diverse representation of the jury as stated in the Charter (Pinder,

Read More
1276 Words | 6 Pages

1. Craig Markham Explains the Canadian Law Enforcement System As a fifteen year veteran Law Enforcement Officer, Craig Markham has become somewhat of an expert in the field. Working with different forms of Law Enforcement, Constable Offices, and Corrections has exposed him to the many intricacies of the Canadian judicial system. Public sector police forces in Canada are associated with the three different levels of government, the federal, provincial, and the municipal.

Read More
1485 Words | 6 Pages

Questions Be sure to answer every component of each of the below questions 1. Identify which documentary you have chosen. Describe in detail what transpired in your chosen case including the crime, the witnesses and the overall case against the defendant. Also be sure to include the verdict and/or the sentence. I have chosen to describe Spousal Abuse, Assault with a Deadly Weapon, Attempted Carjacking: People v. Alfred Garcia.

Read More
1722 Words | 7 Pages

“The Correctional Service of Canada (CSC), as part of the criminal justice system and respecting the rule of law, contributes to public safety by actively encouraging and assisting offenders to become law-abiding citizens, while exercising reasonable, safe, secure and humane control (CSC Values Statement, 2016). In regards to the CSC values mission statement, in this general case, they did not fully succeed in what their value missions statement had said. Often in this Ashley Smith case it will always refer back to CSC’s values mission statement to see if CSC actually followed through with what their expectations were in the Justice System and how they could of handled Ashley Smith in more of a humane approach. This case within the Justice

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

Case brief United States of America v. Chokwe Lumumba, 741 F.2d 12 (2d Cir. 1984) FACTS: During a criminal trial, Chokwe Lumumba, an attorney, several times insulted Judge Duffy and showed disrespectful behavior in court. He was cited for the first time for criminal contempt during jury selection. The second contempt citation was issued outside the presence of the jury. Judge Duffy summarily convicted Lumumba of criminal contempt for these two events at the end of the trial.

Read More
70 Words | 1 Pages

The victim right’s movement of the 1980’s demonstrated a shift in the Judicial and Law Enforcement practices from Rights of the accused to rights of the victim. The fundamental right of the victim was to be represented equitably throughout the criminal justice process. There are four basic rights of the victims that are the right or information and notification, participation, the right to feel and be reasonably protected and

Read More
673 Words | 3 Pages

Victim witness programs are used by the government in order to provide support and assistance to those who fall victim to a crime. According to Victim Witness Program, the primary goals of such programs, include but are not limited to, encouraging victims to participate in any parole and supervised release processes of their offender, notify and facilitate victims in participation of any hearing or release dates in regards to their offender, provide options for supportive services, and advocate for crime victims (2015, para.1). The organization under which the victim-witness program is located is under a system, which has many internal constituencies, thus creating competing and conflicting purposes. The goals of the victim-witness program are quite simple and seek out to give the victim the right to be represented during the processing of the offender, however, given the multiple roles the court, for example, must serve, the goals of the victim-witness program can be both complex and conflicting.

Read More
1422 Words | 6 Pages

Case Brief Title & Citation: 1. Kent V United States 2. 383 U.S. 541 (1966) The Facts: The police detained and questioned 16-year old Morris A. Kent Jr., in connection with several incidents involving theft by force and rape. After admitting to having some involvement, the juvenile court canceled its legal control, allowing the court to try Kent as an adult.

Read More
1763 Words | 8 Pages

Mallard stated that during these interviews he was asked to put “forward his own theories of how it had been committed” (Fair Trials 2013). This demonstrates the denial of the rights of the accused as a mentally ill suspect was taken advantage of and coerced into admitting guilt. This can be seen as coercion and a violation of Mallard’s right to not be compelled to admit guilt (ICCPR). Mallard was questioned continually by police, during which he was bullied and assaulted. This demonstrates the denial of justice, as the police investigation was deeply flawed and conducted unethically.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

The biggest issue within the Criminal Justice system is the large number of wrongful convictions, innocent people sentenced to die for crimes they did not commit. People are put in prison for years, even executed for false convictions. This affects not only those put in prison but friends and family of the accused. Wrongful convictions aren’t solely a tragedy for those directly involved either. It weakens the faith the public has for the justice system as well as poses safety issues; when innocent people are put away, the real criminals are still out there.

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

Judges has various roles and2 duties in the constitutional democracy of Canada. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. (Canadian Superior Courts Judges Association, n.d.). The Canadian Judiciary is an adversarial system of justice and the legal cases are challenged between opposing sides, which assures that evidences and legal disputes will be completely and forcefully presented.

Read More

More about The Case Of Judge Robin Camp

Related Topics

Open Document