In the period of Ancient Greece and Rome, the artist observed human body closely. They concentrated mainly on adolescent bodies of human and ideal bodies. They comprehended the systems of muscles beneath the human skins. The house of God halted the study the human body during the Middle Ages. There existed a small interest in the inner systems, human body, and human lives. The believer saw the body as a sinful and a cause of wrongful enticement. That is why medieval arts do not reflect close human bodies. For example, artist unknown "Adam and Eve" present human as a manuscript illumination. Renaissance artists, however, studied human body to reflect on his art. They thought the best way to study human body was to study anatomy through dissection. They used scientific tools to make his art more naturalistic and more real life. This is a scientific …show more content…
This success is represented in arts in those times. For example, in A Philosopher Giving a Lecture at the Orrery, c. 1765, oil on canvas, 147 x 203 cm (Derby Museum and Art Gallery, Derby, England) by Joseph Wright of Derby, we see something like the clock. Although, one can see that it is a philosopher teaching on orrery and the solar system. There existed a gas light, which means the sun in the orrery. The orbit of the planets also existed. As to the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in Rococo period, the machine, railroads steam power was represented in Rococo artist’s arts. Conclusion In history, arts have described the growing body of scientific knowledge. Ancient Greek and Roman observed youthful human body closely. In middle ages, Christians had the perception that the body is a cause of all forms of lust. However, Renaissance artists, through dissection studied anatomy. During the Baroque times, they also learnt about motion in life. At the begins with Industrial Revolution in Rococo times, there are many artists who describes scientific