On July 1925, the Scopes Monkey trial convicted a teacher guilty for breaking the Butler Act. Inherit the Wind, by Robert E. Lee and Jerome Lawrence, reflects the Scopes Trial in which Bertram Cates is convicted guilty. Henry Drummond, Cates’s defense attorney, fights for the right to think, while educating the courtroom about science at the same time. With Henry Drummond’s boldness, knowledge, and encouragement, he convinces Cates that he did no wrong, and that the Butler Act is unjust.
Throughout the play, Drummond uses his boldness to prove that the Butler act is unfair to those who believe in evolution. When Colonel Brady is cross examined, he exclaims that he knows nothing of evolution, yet has multiple passages of the Bible memorized.
…show more content…
How can you be so cocksure that the body of scientific knowledge systematized in the writings of Charles Darwin is, is in any way, irreconcilably with the spirit of the Book of Genesis?”(Lawrence and Lee 86). Drummond using his ardor to express anger towards Brady not being educated on evolution causes more people turn to Cates’s side. The fact that Brady is able to testify against evolution without being educated on it shows that the Butler Act is unjust. Brady winning conveys that the Butler Act is prejudiced towards those with religious beliefs. When the judge exclaims that the right to think is not on trial, Drummond expresses: “with all respect to the bench, I hold that the right to think is very much on trial! It is fearfully I’m dangerously in the proceedings of this court!”(Lawrence and Lee 72). Drummond’s confidence allows him to acknowledge to the courtroom that the right to think is on trial. Cates expressing his beliefs with Drummond supporting him, …show more content…
When Brady is being questioned on the stopping of the sun, and the ruin of the Earth, Brady claims it did not happen. Then Drummond proceeds to yell: “it must’ve happened! According to natural law. Or don’t you believe in natural law, Colonel?” (Lawrence and Lee 89). Drummond’s knowledge allows him to correct Brady on natural law, which leaves Brady looking clueless. Drummond’s knowledge of science causes Cates to have faith that more people will take his side. The fact that Brady admitted that the Bible may be wrong, yet still won, shows how unjust the Butler Act is. Again, when Brady is asked on the events in the Bible, and its relevance to the real world, he claims that everything has happened in the Bible, even if scientifically proven wrong. After Brady says everything in the Bible is true, Drummond says: “now if what you say factually happened--if Joshua halted the sun in the sky--that means the earth stopped spinning on its axis; continents toppled over each other, mountains flew out into space. And the earth, arrested in its orbit, shriveled to a cinder and crashed into the sun. How come they missed this tidbit of news” (Lawrence and Lee 89). Brady looks ignorant as Drummond demolishes him with facts. Drummond considers that Brady says everything in the Bible is true, but why did all these facts get left out from science? Since