The Similarities And Differences Between Columbian Exchange And The Silk Road

By the sixteenth century, the Ottomans had emerged as one of the most important Empires in Europe, and in the territories known today as the Middle East.” The battle between Habsburgs and Ottomans goes deeper than just a religious versus non-religious logical happenstances. As the two thriving empires, had similar yet diverse ideals when it comes to their political, economic and social structure of the two empires. As many governments are ran mainly by power and money, the Habsurg and Ottoman government was ran by religion. All the while, as both empires used their military to enhance their religion, rich their economy and take part in the slave trade they had similarities and differences like any other country who was at war with eachother.

The Columbian exchange and the Silk road were both trading system. Europeans, Caribbeans, Africans, Asians and Americans, were connected to the Columbian exchange as the Silk Road linked China, India, and many other empires. Despite the fact that the Ottoman empire was easy-going with the different religions, the Hasburg empire didn’t give any religion the benefit of the doubt. As the Ottoman empire encountered an economic hit, this did not stop them from increasing the taxes on trade. As the Natives involuntary worked on encomienda, they produced goods that will be sold in Europe. In return, the Hasburg were responsible for their well-being and they provided them a gateway to Christianity. Through this, the Spanish were able to take part in the Columbian Exchange, which brought goods to the Americas, Africa, and

“As fierce as the struggle between Muslims and Christians for dominance was, when the French king found himself squeezed on both sides of his kingdom by his archrival, Charles V, the Ottomans became his natural allies” as the Ottoman outbreak on the capital of its imperial rival was hard to surpass. The Ottoman army was a powerful enemy. In describing the military efforts of the Ottomans and Habsburgs alike, despite all the modern day talk of Ottoman corruption, they continued to have an advantage over the Habsburgs due to such strong army. Habsburg, as the march on to Istabul was an unreachable dream, the relief of Vienna took the Habsburg coalition army three campaigning seasons to capture Buda. War is rightly understood as a form of cultural contact, in spite of having both sides learn and adapt in the matters of barrier strategies, the use of firepower and mounted troops was used to the Ottoman advantage. Nonetheless, it was an economic edge that was use to protect the trade between the Habsburg land and the Ottoman empire, as the interaction between the two enemies was purily beyond a military competition. The ages of conflict between the Ottomans and Habsburg has often been a civilizion explosion. The war would be dominated by land movements, and the growth of the Ottoman Empire signified the restructuring of a radical empire controlled by