More handpicked essays just for you.
Outline and critically evaluate the jury system
Outline and critically evaluate the jury system
Outline and critically evaluate the jury system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Outline and critically evaluate the jury system
For example, the prosecutor will introduce him or herself “Good morning ladies and gentlemen, my name is Mr. or Mrs. State Prosecutor and I represent the State of California. I am here to prove that the defendant is the man who shot and killed Christopher Wallace. Then the defense will give their opening statement
First, let me discuss the five basic rights for the accused during trial. For the first right the chapter discussed the right to trial by jury. To elaborate, the right to trial by jury is only given in serious offenses. To classify a serious offense a person has to be sentenced to more than six months imprisonment.
Jurors should not know anything about a specific case and not follow public affairs and read the news (Doc F). When a person is selected to be part of a jury, they have to say an oath stating that they will not use their emotions to determine the verdict of a trial. If a juror is caught using their emotions, they will be fined for a crime called perjury. Since there are twelve people in a jury, there is a variation of opinions when the jury decides a verdict. But, a judge is more professional and knows how to only use the evidence provided and be less biased.
Jury convicted on weapons possession but acquitted on possession of the trunk contents. D’s argued that the guns were in the possession of the girl and they did not have possession. D’s challenged the constitutionality of the New York State statute which allowed a charge of illegal possession if a gun was found in a car occupied by all individuals
Part of jury duty is playing the role of an active detective looking for facts, so to speak. Making every judgement count, because the person on trial has a fate that falls in your hands and the other eleven detectives. Some people may think that jury duty is a waste of time and make a rushed guess. As a citizen of the u.s it 's a person 's duty to serve on a jury. Being a citizen of the u.s is what I think is safe to say the best title to be given.
The American jury system has been around for centuries but all of a sudden, people are trying to change it. Hundreds of years ago in England, the first of the jury systems were adopted. When there was a crime, the accused was brought before a judge and jury (B.E.). The jury, a group of twelve white men, from the area the crime was committed, heard the case and all of the evidence (B.E.). Those 12 men, decided whether or not the person being accused was guilty or not.
A man sits upon the stand as he hopes for the jury to plead him not guilty. The American Jury System has been in the United States Judicial Branch for over 385 years. The basis of a bench trial is that there is only a Judge that decides whether the accused is guilty or not guilty. Whereas on a jury trial the fate of the accused is proposed to the jury and they would decide whether he is guilty or not guilty. The jury trials provide fairness, it represents citizenship, and there is less of a bias than that of a bench trial.
Over the years, a plethora of court cases have caused Americans to wonder: is our jury system indeed as wondrous as it is conceived to be? To explain, the jury system is the concept of giving the defendant in a trial the option of either having a bench trial, one where a judge alone reaches a verdict, or a trial by jury, one where a group of twelve ordinary citizens is chosen to reach a verdict on the case. One may wonder why a dozen everyday denizens are being endowed with the absolute power over a possibly life or death decision in the life of a neighbor that is unknown to them, but the framers of the United States Constitution believed that this was the most democratic option in making sure that justice is properly served. Explaining further,
Trial, defined by Dictionary.com (n.d.) states “the examination before a judicial tribunal of the facts put in issue in a cause, often including issues of law as well as those of fact”. A trial is to bring and present information to a tribunal (a court is a form of tribunal) before a jury, judge, or other designated trier, in a formal way. This allows the authorities to adjudicate the claims or the disputes of the accused person in order to attain a resolution to the dispute. (Yale Law Journal, 507) The criminal defendant also has the right to have a public trial or a secret trial depending on the case.
The American Jury System offers the United States citizens an opportunity to be proven guilty or innocent when a crime has been committed. The twelve person jury system was established in England hundreds of years ago. Originally this system was made up of twelve men and this was huge because they had the power to go against what the judge wanted in court. There are many vital points as to why our American jury system is successful; jury trials by the numbers, ownership by jury members towards the accused, how reliable or unreliable evidence is viewed by jurors, gender balance and the detailed screening process in which jurors are selected.
2. example 1 Firstly Ordinary people may not understand complex legal technicalities, these people may not be educated in the concept of law and maybe not even educated properly. Some people may have been educated in a completely different field and have no idea what any of the case means. This could cause the jury to loose interest and just go with what everyone else is saying because they have no idea what is going on. A lot of society have no idea about the legal requirements and what actually is right and wrong and what an offence actually is.
“The boy is five feet eight inches tall. His father was six feet two inches tall. That’s a difference of six inches. It’s a very awkward thing to stab down into the chest of someone who’s half a foot taller than you are. ”-(Juror two, 54)
Juror 3 vs Juror 8: In Comparison and Contrast Juror 3, played by Lee J. Cobb and Juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, are both men of business, the former a literal businessman and the latter an architect, respectively, but differ in their personalities and sympathies that go along with them. Juror 3 and Juror 8 both share careers that deal either fully in business, or partially in business. Juror 3 is a businessman, as well as a father, as mentioned during his anecdote of his embarrassment after witnessing his nine year-old son run away from a fight, ending the story with his son punching him in the jaw at the age of 16. Juror 8 is an architect by trade, and must deal with some form of business during the architectural process. Since both
Trial jury is smaller in size compared to the grand jury, trial jury usually consists of 6-12 people. Trial jury, which is usually the type of jury we see televised, is usually open to the public, very strict, and controlled by a judge. Defendants usually are allowed to be present, as well as testify, and call witnesses if they choose to do so. A trial usually has no say so regarding the trial they are working on, usually the only thing they are allowed to do, is deliberate and come up with a final decision, also known as the verdict. The trial jury rules either in favor of the plaintiff or defendant.
Money, Love, Murder! Vera Claythrone has killed and will kill again. In the book “And Then There Was None” by Agatha Christie the murder is Vera Claythorne because she has had opportunities to murder, she is nervous, and she has killed for money before. First, the text states “Vera said you mean… and paused General Macarthur nodded”, (Christie pg 130) this quote proves that Vera was the last known person to have talked to General Macarthur before he was found dead. This connects back to real life because death can make people act irrationally.
