ipl-logo

The Stolen Generation: Paul Keating's Acknowledgment Speech

834 Words4 Pages

The mistreatment of Aboriginal Australians during the time which is now called ‘The Stolen Generation’ is the real low point in Australian History. Being explored in this essay is how Paul Keating’s acknowledgment speech changed the way films perceive Aborigines, as Aboriginals went from being seen as destructive and violent to innocent and wrong done by. It will also include how the film Rabbit Proof Fence put a human face on an issue most didn’t understand and how Kevin Rudd’s apology speech allowed reconciliation between non-Aboriginal Australians and Aboriginal Australians. These three events to an extent changed the attitudes and treatments of Aborigines by giving a society a greater understanding of what happened during the time we refer …show more content…

This speech here was very different to Kevin Rudd’s apology speech which occurred a soon 16 years later, Paul Keating only acknowledged what they did was wrong but he didn’t say sorry. But this still had a big influence on what society thought and how they acted towards Aboriginal Australians. Before Paul Keating’s speech the only Aboriginal movies that existed were Jedda, Walkabout, Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith and The Last Wave. All these movies showed Aboriginal culture in a destructive and violent sense from the point of view of non-Aboriginal Australians. Whereas after this speech, a film such as Rabbit Proof Fence show cased the Aboriginal side of the story and not the non-Aboriginal side. These movies showed a different side to Aboriginal culture where they saw themselves. Also after this acknowledgment speech a soon 8 years after was the first official Sorry Day, Paul Keating’s speech had that big of an influence on society celebrates annually on the 26th of May for Sorry …show more content…

Kevin Rudd stating “this blemished chapter in our national history” meaning what we did was wrong and will forever be seen as a down fall in our country’s history. This speech is one of the biggest turning points in Australian History as from this point on the view of Aboriginal Australians were seen as the same as non-Aboriginal Australians. In the speech Rudd states “close the gap” by this he means for what happened in the past will be made up to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as they are to enjoy the same opportunities as all other Australians. After this speech the ‘gap’ was closed as all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people receive rights to Aboriginal land in Australia, as well as health care rights and schooling rights. After this speech the treatment of Aboriginals had changed because now before every sporting game or school assembly we pay respect to the Ancestors of the land. ''The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia's history by righting the wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future,'' by Kevin Rudd producing this apology it truly did right the wrongs for what happened in the

Show More
Related
613 Words | 3 Pages

In the Herald Sun, Andrew Bolt’s article ‘Seven Sins of the Change Australia Day Movement’, posted in the 27th of January 2017, asserts the negative and “sin” like properties of changing the date of Australia Day. The “change the Australia Day movement” has ignited a vehement debate that has divided Australians for years, and will most likely continue to. The procedural format clearly and concisely retorts that changing the date will not “heal wounds” and we, as a county, should be instead focused on fixing the issues within the indigenous culture. Bolt ignites the debate very early in his article by affirming that changing the date inevitably “solves nothing”. A strong authoritative tone is taken in the first argument when Bolt uses an

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

The Prime Minister of Australia changed Australia, the world and himself with his actions and choices. ‘Which will give to our country some confidence of being able to hold out until the tide of battle swings against our enemy.’ Rest aside the obvious, (the military defence of Australia), Curtin was differential in a number of factors, including rights, more of them for more people. He introduced better and improved healthcare, and more welfare services. It was not just what he did but how he did it, a pride for his country, determination and it is that as well as what he bought to the tables is why we remember John Curtin today.

Read More
1740 Words | 7 Pages

Introduction In 1993, the former Victorian Premier, Jeff Kennett, stated that ‘from good we gain pride; from the bad we learn; and from the totality of our past we gain our identity'. In his speech, Kennett speaks about his ideologies of republicanism and his “excitement” for the potential for the nation to position itself for the future. The quote is derived from a section of his speech, where Kennett is talking about Australia’s history with the United Kingdom and how it is best forgotten. He states that whilst this section of Australian history is best forgotten, Australia, as a nation, cannot pick and choose its history.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

We are gathered here today, in loving memory of the greatest prime minister to ever grace Australian soil. Gough Whitlam broke a 23-year-old dry spell for the labour party and although his term in office was a mere three years, in that three years he did more than any other prime minister ever has and truly began to shape the Australia we live in today. From humble beginnings, to fighting for Australia, Whitlam was a man of great courage and will and for that his legacy will transpire long past his time. FIRST BODY PARA: ‘Terra Nullius’ the two words that initiated white superiority in Australia for over 100 years. Gough Whitlam was the first Australian prime minister to accept instead of oppress and put an end to a previously idealistic

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

This essay will look at the aspects or reasons as to how and why the coalition government has won the federal election that took place on the 7th of September 2013. There are many reasons why Tony Abbott has won victory against the Rudd and Gillard government and to gain hundreds of thousands of Australian citizen’s trust. Reasons include; Tony Abbott putting a stop to the boats entering the Australian land, the abolishment of carbon tax and the reduction of the cost of living, Abbott promising to recognize Aborigines as nations first people, and lastly Tony Abbott took advantage the distrust that has been happening between the Rudd and Gillard Government to his power by pin pointing their flaws and issues thus making the citizens of Australia think twice on whether they should really put their complete trust in an unstable government to run the country given the economic difficulties happening today around the world. This essay will ideally discuss in depth as to why the coalition won the 2013 federal election and factors that has persuaded the citizens of Australia to vote for the Abbott government.

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

‘Surrender? Don’t be bloody silly, we’re Australian’. This quote is the opposite view proposed within John Schumann’s article ‘Aussie image now a myth’. Schumann’s portrayal on Australian culture reflects the idea that Australian’s lack national pride and identity, based on the fact that we no longer possess the moral qualities of mateship. Australian mateship is defined as ‘companionship or friendship between men’, which is clearly not associated within Schumann’s article, which argues that we have lost our morals, motivation and mateship. This statement is clearly wrong.

Read More
1097 Words | 5 Pages

Liddle expresses that the need to hold a survey itself displays the radio station’s lack of support for the Aboriginal community and informs the audience that “60% of the people who responded to the Triple J survey supported a change of date for the countdown”, suggesting “… as far as younger generations are concerned society is becoming more aware”, however juxtaposes this with Triple J’s inadequacy and disappointment at the fact that “there’s still a way to go before the message permeates its ranks”. The audience is able to view the prevalent support throughout Australia as a nation with Liddle’s use of statistical information, regarding the change of date and how this smaller issue supports the move of changing the date of Australia Day as a whole. Likewise, Liddle positions the individual who linger around the issue and remain unaware and unsupportive, as the minority as “now being majority support for a date change”. This furthermore conveys criticism of Triple J, “who do not mention that the major reason 26 January has become contentious is due to what the date means to Indigenous groups”, however in order to escape adopting a supportive stance, provide an excuse of “new programming”. The author continues to expose Triple J’s motives to the readers who have been misinformed and displaying their lack of acknowledgement as to what this day means to the Aboriginals, insinuating that fact that it was purely implemented as a commercial change.

Read More
1303 Words | 6 Pages

In his speech, he offered an apology to members of the German–Australian community present at the meeting: “The tragic, and often shameful, discrimination against Australians of German origin fostered during the world wars had many consequences. No doubt, some of you carry the emotional scars of injustice during those times as part of your backgrounds or family histories. Let me as Governor-General say to all who do how profoundly sorry I am that such things happened in our country”. 4.

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

Good morning/ afternoon ladies and gentlemen I would firstly like to begin by saying that I am very pleased to be here and I would like to thank unity grammar college for having me here today as a guest speaker. My name is Kira, and I was present on the day of the Redfern speech. It was on December the 10th 1992 that Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating had given a speech on the aboriginal reconciliation addressing issues faced by indigenous Australians. Paul Keating was one of the first Australian prime ministers to address and acknowledge the fact that the Europeans were solely responsible for the complications faced by the aboriginal communities.

Read More
1589 Words | 7 Pages

As the government overlooks the aboriginals and local residents, this documentary is created in order to shed light to the

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

This article discusses the speech given by an Indigenous journalist, Stan Grant who participated in a debate where he spoke for the motion “Racism is destroying the Australian Dream’’. Hence, the main points of this article are mostly evidence given by Grant in his debate to support his idea that the Australian Dream is indeed rooted in racism. One of the main points is that the indigenous Australians are often excluded and disregarded as non-Australians simply due to their race and skin colour. Grant pointed out the incident where AFL player Adam Goodes was publicly jeered and told that he did not belong to his country as he was not an Australian despite the fact that Australia indeed is the land of his ancestors.

Read More
1592 Words | 7 Pages

After the recent anniversary of the apology to AFL legend, Nicky Winmar, this inspirational moment in Indigenous sporting history continues to be forgotten. The choice to stand and take action in showing the honour to be Aboriginal is scary and brave. They should not feel like this ever, feel scared for showing others their identity, yet they are and being criticised for the colour of their skin. We need to make this a normality for them, so they do not have to be crying out for a place to belong. Our nation will all experience a loss of identity and belonging at some point in our lives, however we fail to acknowledge this to be a daily routine for many Indigenous Australians.

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

This speech was delivered on the 11th of November 1993, Remembrance Day, making it a historical, political and social address. This speech was widely televised and had a wide reach due to the event of commemorating the lost lives of the many brave souls of the Great War. The Prime Minister’s, Paul Keating, address had many purposes; the eulogy of the “Unknown Australian soldier” being the main one. This was evident by the structure of the speech and the use of strong emotive language. The tone of the speech was very formal and patriotic, which was appropriate to the circumstances at the time.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction The Racial Discrimination Act was implemented in 1975 and was drafted in response to a global push to codify protections for Indigenous Australians and other racial minorities. Section 18C of this act makes it unlawful to offend, insult, humiliate or intimate an individual or a group of people on the basis of race, colour or national origin (Austlii.edu.au.) This clause was brought to the fore front of national debate as popular conservative columnist, Andrew Bolt, was found in violation of this law when he accused mix-raced Indigenous Australians of using their heritage to claim government benefits. The Abbott government pledged to repeal section 18C but has subsequently withdrawn the motion following severe backlash from the wider community (Aston.)

Read More
1396 Words | 6 Pages

"Reconciliation will not work if it puts a higher value on symbolic gestures rather than the practical needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in areas like health, housing, education and employment." Warren Mundine AO Reconciliation is the action of making one view or belief compatible with another according to the Oxford dictionary of English. The term reconciliation was used as a symbolic gesture in an address made on February 13th 2008 by the former Prime Minister of Australia, Kevin Rudd. Kevin Rudd was the first political figure to speak out and seek reconciliation for the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders after being elected as prime minster in 2007. He spoke out after many generations of mistreated Indigenous Australians that had their rights and equality continuously ignored, but after all that has happened, including the effect of broken families, which still in 2018 have the aftermath of "The stolen generation", there was only one public apology and no compensation for the damages caused to the native people of this country.

Read More

More about The Stolen Generation: Paul Keating's Acknowledgment Speech

Open Document