Webster argued the Constitution was design to settle such economic disputes between states. Allowing concurrent laws to conflict would be dangerous and contagious if not handled by the federal government. Attorney Writ supported the federal supremacy over these states was enumerated in the Constitution. Gibbons’ steamboats operated “among several states” (US National Archives & Records Administration n.d.), and the Commerce Clause states, “ Congress shall have the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among several States, and with Indian tribes” (US National Archives & Records Administration n.d.). Gibbons’ steamboats in fact operated in New Jersey and in New York; therefore it aptly applied in this situation.
It stated that giving states this right would be, “1st Blending together legislative and judicial powers. 2nd Hazarding an interruption of the peace of the states by civil discord, in case of a diversity of opinions among the state legislature. 3rd
The states can contest the federal government rules and regulations in the federal judiciary branch. The states have contested federal laws, incidence of them blocking federal authorities from enforcing federal laws and cases involving individuals who break federal laws, but not state law (Levy, 2013). The ability of states to challenge federal laws that they feel are unconstitutional is part of our system of democracy. These challenges have led to parts of a law or the full law to be unconstitutional and overturned by the
To whom this may concern, On this 11th day of September, I Edmund Randolph will be presenting my solution to the catastrophes of our uncivilized government. As a citizen of the United States I believe we the body deserve a well organized, well established government that can’t be destroyed by surrounding countries. Here I present to you the Virginia plan. Keep in mind France has had a well organized and well thought out civilized government for many years.
The Constitution is frequently thought to be the preeminent law of the United States that all laws made after it ought to maintain. Hamilton expressed that "the Constitution should be the standard of development for the laws, and that wherever there is an obvious restriction, the laws should offer place to the Constitution" (Document E). In any case, there have been times in United States history where a law has been passed that collides with the Constitution. On the off chance that the Constitution truly is the preeminent law of the United States, than any unlawful law that is passed ought to be toppled. In the event that the Supreme Court did not have the force of legal audit, than the privileges of the Constitution would gradually be taken away by new laws that contention with the Constitution.
The rule of law is reflected as a core principle of our nation and vital to ordered liberty. To rightly govern the American rule of law it is essential to acknowledge the continuity between the American Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. The United States of America “government” is framed by these two important documents. The principles of the Declaration of Independence constitute the foundation of the government based on the universal equality of all human beings, and the U.S. Constitution founds the political process that is to be followed by the elected officials in governing the people. One cannot be without the other; both are essential for a stable government.
The Concurrent Powers are so significant to everybody and it's crucial that State and Federal Government would be involved
When a men rule over other men, that can be dangerous and even deadly. The government must control the governed and control itself (Madison 1). A nation’s administration must depend on people for its direction, but there are some reservations that must be maintained. Two views are presented about why the federal system of America should follow a constitution. The first is that usurpations are protected with the division and distinctions in governmental departments (Madison 2).
The people of the United States can depend on the President to fulfill his duties and exercise his power correctly, and laws will be obeyed, no matter what happens. All the influence of the previous cases rolled into the importance of this case, gaining the most attention and receiving the most action to resolve
Although some Supreme Court cases have helped to explicitly establish some powers of the national government, there are many spheres where states make decisions on their own and some aspects in which the national and federal government coincide. The “picket fence” refers to the overlap of national and states’ rights and how they work collectively on these issues. Even though the national government is a powerful entity, it is still kept in check by the states and by its various branches. Rather than having very outlined restrictions, the states and national government work together for the bettering of the nation. Also, the national government has allowed states to keep autonomy with block grants, which allow them to choose how to spend their funds to better assist their citizens.
In Gibbons, Marshall continues this same logic as he asserts the supremacy of the Federal over the states; Marshall writes, “the acts of congress… are supreme; and the law of the state… must yield to it,” Though the states righters believed the states to win out in conflicts of state and federal shared powers, Marshall, by means of the Constitution, makes it clear that the unified government over the Union is supreme as a body with more widespread will granted by the unified people rather than by the individual state
46, written again by James Madison, he emphasizes that the national and state governments are two totally contrastive organizations. By expressing that they are separate but are still able to connect on various platforms, Madison reveals that the power of these governments lie in the people. Furthermore, the people’s instinctive presence will always influence the governments of their respective states, therefore the federal government must, in relation, be exceptionally compliant with the people. As said in true terms, “ The adversaries of the Constitution seem to have lost sight of the people altogether in their reasonings on this subject; and to have viewed these different establishments, not only as mutual rivals and enemies, but as uncontrolled by any common superior in their efforts to usurp the authorities of each other. These gentlemen must here be reminded of their error.
The Commerce clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution, which gives Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foregin nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes”. This clause is one of the most fundamental powers delegated to congress by the founders. It has helped to seprate the powers between the federal governemtn and the states, along with the branches of governemtn and Judiciary. In simpler terms the commerce clause was to help regulate commerce among navigable waters.
By allowing the judicial branch to interpret the law so that the executive branch can implement and enforce it, the United States government has found a way to combat this issue caused by divided government. Though divided government has been known to create problems, they can be overcome. Solutions such as these can keep the government functioning
The government of the United States, through federalism, is separated between the federal government and the states. The Constitution gives clearly defined to the federal government, and any other power that is not explicitly given to the federal government is reserved to the states. However, there is still debate over whether or not states should comply with federal mandates. The answer to the debate is yes, states should be in compliance with federal mandates.
