ipl-logo

Power Politics: The Concept Of International Law

1867 Words8 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Criticism of realism in international relations

Ever since the establishment of state sovereignty through Westphalia treaty we have seen various international laws emerging in the international world of politics. Originally, International Laws are shaped by group of kingdoms or states through treaties which commonly contains temporary ceasefires and to not so less extent trade conducts. In this day and age though, international laws are instigated from several International Institutions (i.e.: United Nations) which addresses issues ranging from territorial borders to human rights violations. Numerous international laws in the modern world right now are considered ‘binding’ connoting that it is obliged to adhere to it; similar to how it is required for us as citizens to adhere to our national …show more content…

This paper will try to asses that question in particular.
Theoretical Framework
 The concept of International Law
International law, also called public international law or law of nations, is the body of legal rules, norms, and standards that apply between sovereign states and other entities that are legally recognized as international actors .
 The concept of Power Politics
Political action characterized by the exercise or pursuit of power as a means of coercion. International diplomacy based on the use or threatened use of military, political or economic power. Power politics is the core of realism, as realism assumes that states merely do something based on their national interest, and through whatever means necessary, including the means above.
 Realism
Realism is one of the mainstream theories in International Relations and I believe it is safe to say that this paradigm is commonly used or at least known throughout the world. From International Organization Pease Fifth Edition (2014), Realism is often referred to as power politics or realpolitik, realism’s central focus is the acquisition, maintenance, and exercise of power by states. In the eyes of classical realists, power will only be what we call as “hard” power, which are tangible military capabilities and to some extent, economic …show more content…

The assumption of the realist in this matter is correct in my opinion. States will prioritize its national interest first more than anything, and by anything it includes international law. Hence, even if the international law did exist, major states could merely dismiss it, as they will presumably get no harm. A shame for the law exists to serve on one purpose: Justice, and by that sense international law exists to serve justice in the world, to be able to create peace. Well, seeing these (in gaming term) many ‘glitches’ in the international laws though, peace is still far away from

Show More
Related
978 Words | 4 Pages

International laws govern how countries and states should interact with each other international law has an impact on domestic laws through human rights treaties, importing and exporting of goods and global communications and connections. The Mabo case reflects this because the domestic law at the time didn’t match the international

Read More
1519 Words | 7 Pages

Viewing Ambassador Power’s statements through both the lens of liberalism and realism allows one to better understand the policies and ideas which she presents throughout her speech. The theoretical tradition of liberalism, specifically the neoliberal framing of it, assists in clarifying why it is necessary, in Ambassador Power’s mind, that states both cooperate and create a shared understanding of expectations by abiding to rules which have previously been defined and outlined. Ambassador Power argument shows that it is imperative that states join and posture to prevent Russia from taking any further actions, specifically ones which may jeopardize the security of the United States. Realism explains how the pursuit of power dictates the behaviors of states and the policies which they push. Given that there is a net amount of power, the prevention of another state, in this instance Russia, from gaining power inherently increases the power of all other states while at the same time escalating the security of said states.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

The issue with realpolitik is that it lacks moral thinking when it comes to solving an issue. For example North Korea is an example of being able to use both ways of thinking. An idealistic approach would mean the United states would do everything it can to protect its allies. A realpolitik approach would result in the United States encouraging China to deal with the issue themselves(Johnson

Read More
461 Words | 2 Pages

Judith Jarvis Thomson, the author of this article, provides several defenses for abortion, but makes it crystal clear that possessing the right to abort does not equal to the right to kill. A fetus may be seen as an innocent human being with the right to live, but there are plenty of reasons why abortion may be justified. This is an issue that anti-abortion protestors seem to overlook. Pro-life advocates seem to sympathize and empathize with a pregnant woman’s right to decide whether motherhood is just for herself and just for society. Human development is the premise for Pro-Life advocates.

Read More
10420 Words | 42 Pages

The International Court of Justice reflects western tradition of dispute resolution while at the same time nations had grown into different sorts of culture 6. It is argued that the International Court of Justice suffers from structural deficiencies. Many newly independent states argue that the traditional international law is biased towards European and American states 7. The ICJ is also criticized on the basis of customary law.

Read More
2260 Words | 10 Pages

Looking back over the development of the Security Studies field, there can be no doubt that the realist tradition has exercised enormous influence. Even the harshest of critics can acknowledge that with their focus on power, fear, and anarchy, realist theories have provided centrally important explanations for conflict and war (Williams, 2013). One interpretation of realism that is unbroken amongst most commentators of the theory is that realists are individuals that believe the State is the principle actor in international politics and that they are very concerned with the balance of power (Marsalis, 2013). They argue that all the State’s actions and choices are a reflection of the collective will of the people, which is also an argument

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

He says the existence of a dominant power always exercise hegemonial authority thereby creating a norms under which independent states interact with each other. This conceptual framework of states existing under certain prescribes norms finds relevant in the contemporary IR more likely after the Treaty of Westphalia. This hegemonic world order needs to be explained from an approach which best predicts events and affairs in the international system. Looking at the larger factors concerning

Read More
958 Words | 4 Pages

4.0 An Explanation of Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism and Post-Structuralism. 4.1 Realism Realism or political realism prioritizes national interests and security concerns in addition to moral ideology and social reconstruction. The term is often associated with political power. The term is often associated with political power. Realism believes that the state is the main actor of the most important in determining the direction of a country.

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

It is heavily influenced from the Groation tradition. According to this perspective, regimes are much more pervasive and exist in all areas of international relations. Contrary to the conventional structure and modified structural, this viewpoint moves away from realist thinking as it is “too limited to explain an increasingly complex, interdependent, and complex world.” This approach rejects the assumption that the international system is comprised of states and the balance of power is solely due to force. Rather, it argues that elites are the principal actors and that they have national and transnational ties.

Read More
1427 Words | 6 Pages

Literatures on the study of dichotomy in International Relations critiques dichotomies for its simple dualistic abstraction of complex world politics. However, despite its serious fallacies, scholars and even critiques uses dichotomies, knowingly or unknowingly, in some form or the other. This research attempts to study the use of dichotomy in International Relations. In doing so, the study will apply Marcelo Dascal’s notion of “strategic argument” on dichotomy which sees dichotomy as a strategy used by contenders in a debate to resolve it in their favour. Here dichotomy becomes a constructed and contextual phenomenon rather than a semantic, realistic category.

Read More
897 Words | 4 Pages

Idealists see realism as a set of assumptions about how and why states behave like they do, rather than a theory of foreign relations. They strongly criticise the realist thesis that the struggle for power and security is natural. They reject such a fatalistic orientation claiming that power is not natural, and simply a temporary phase of human history. They believe that by adhering completely and consciously to moral values moral values in behaviour, power struggle and war can be eliminated.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

It believes that all individuals are born with an increasing desire to own power hardwired inside them. In these circumstances dominant states should do direct high power over their rivals. In the other hand, structural realism does not define the quest for power, instead it is focused on the structure of the international

Read More
1938 Words | 8 Pages

The current work is meant to explain the differences and similarities between the most dominant theories in international relations, Realism and Liberalism, both theories have some similarities and differences but much more important and interesting is to discuss and explain what differs and makes similar both theories. Conflicts and wars, Similarities and differences between Realism and Liberalism: Both Liberalism and Realism believes that there is no world government that can prevent countries to go to war on one another. For both theories military power is important and both Realism and Liberalism can understand that countries can use military power to get what they need or want. Also, both theories are conscious that without military

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

There are reasons for this, first is that, internal implementation of international law is always conditioned by a rule of the state’s municipal law. Clearly stating that international law’ internal interpretation is always governed by the municipal constitution. Second is that in national courts, even a monist country, their courts may fail sometimes to execute treaties which are binding under international law. United State law is an example of non-self-executing treaty. While dualist country’s courts, unincorporated treaties are given limited effect on the internal process.

Read More
1381 Words | 6 Pages

The international relations schools of thought known as Realism and Idealism identify specific and similar characteristics of actors in the conceptual development of their theories. While many of these characteristics can be generalized as being synonymous with the two theories, both theories make a separate distinction in what specifically constitutes an actor. In Realism, the term “actor” refers directly and solely to the state: a combination of government, leaders, decision-makers, etc, that act as a unitary entity to promote the interests of the state. Idealists, however, expand on what constitutes an actor to include both the state and people. Not only do the principles of Idealism assert that the state and people should be considered actors, in fact, both they must be viewed as actors.

Read More

More about Power Politics: The Concept Of International Law

Related Topics

Open Document