ipl-logo

The Things They Carried A War Story Analysis

637 Words3 Pages

The things they carried is a novel by Tim O’Brien. About the Vietnam war. About the lives of people going there. It’s a collection of war stories. Some of them true, some of the untrue and that’s the main topic that’ll be discussed in this paper. What is a true war story? How can it be told? this is a quite complicated question with a quite complex response(s). a true war story is something beyond generalizing, that could be true and untrue at a time. There is not only one type of truth, but happening and seeming truths, and not the man could know the real truth in a war story. “To generalize about war is like generalizing about peace. Almost everything is true. Almost nothing is true…(p81). This contradictory passage is somehow paradoxical. …show more content…

It was rigged 105 round…(p84)”. According to the narrator, if Lemon had a chance to tell how he died he would tell that sunlight beautifully killed him. Not a detonator, because he didn’t see one. The thing he saw was the light. He really did so it’s true. It’s true that the sunlight killed him, from his point if view. But not from O’Brien’s. He saw how he exploded on a detonator . and that’s the truth. That’s where the reader gets to the diverse truth. O’Brien differentiates between happening and seeming truths. The truth that Lemon exploded on a detonator is a happening truth. The actual reality. But the story Lemon would tell is a seeming truth. This real truth, the happening one can never reject Lemon’s seeming truth. They can coexist together with other seeming truths in addition. This story, with it’s truths is many-sided. Many truths fit the story. Maybe it’s war itself that makes story multilateral. War makes people define some things differently from each other. War is what denies an absolute truth in a war story. “In war you lose your sense of definite, hence your sense of truth itself, and, therefore, it’s safe to say that in a true war story nothing is absolutely true(p82)”. War many-sided. In war, one can never say anything definitely because the perception

Show More
Related
670 Words | 3 Pages

World War II (WWII) is a very common topic discussed in high school english classes mainly due to the facts that WWII is a perfect example of good vs. evil in the real world and there is an endless amount of books written about this tragic era in history. Two examples of these type of books are Laura Hillenbrand’s Unbroken and Elie Wiesel’s Night; and like all of the other WWII books, these two address themes about the hardships of war and how hope is always present. One specific theme that these books support is that in war, there will always be peace; this is shown through elements of faith, happiness, and trauma. To begin, the two main characters of the books Unbroken and Night face a struggle with their individual faiths, but in very different ways. Louis (Louie) Zamperini initially was not the most religious man but when faced with the most dire of situations he turned to God repeatedly for help and counsel.

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

In My Brother Sam is Dead the authors prove that war is futile. War is futile means that war is pointless or, not producing any useful product. One of the points that proves war is futile is it confuses reality with principle. Secondly war creates the youth against the elders, a clash of generations. Lastly the most devastating point that proves war is futile is it tears families apart.

Read More
1264 Words | 6 Pages

“Ted Lavender, who was scared, carried tranquilizers until he was shot in the head.” Pg. 2 This is ironic because the Ted was the most frighten person in the group who was scared to die and somehow he was the first victim to die. “The thumb was dark brown, rubbery to the touch, and weighed 4 ounces at most.” Pg.

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

For example in the chapter, O’Brien announces that “A true war story is never moral”(O’Brien 65), but, later on in the chapter he contradicts himself conveying that “ In a true war story, if there's a moral at all, it’s like the thread that makes the cloth ”(O’Brien 74). He starts off saying a true war story has no morals, but then he explains that the moral means everything to a war story, which contradicts his earlier statement. This contradictory excerpt from the chapter parallels the idea of the Vietnam war in the fact that to make peace, there had to be war and bloodshed to solve the problem that the United States and North Vietnam had with one another. War is contradictory in itself ,and O’Brien’s contradictory motif illustrates it well. In fact, the idea of war is a reoccurring topic in “How to Tell a True War Story,” and O’Brien illustrates this idea of war with many other devices as

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

This demonstrates how the focus of the reading is to define how a true war story is not about the war. Another way O’Brien establishes the main idea of a war story not being about the war is the different narratives he uses. One

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

The world has been prospering from war for a long time. But, we do not always see the problems it causes. For instance, it tears families apart, it clashes generations, and finally it shows us principal versus reality. So, if war brings more bad things than good it defeats the purpose of even having a war in the first place. The authors of My Brother Sam is Dead also feels that war is pointless and unnecessary.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

He claims that the WWI was “Armageddon” or the end of the world because it was the most destructive war ever witnessed by humanity. He also says that because it was a great war, the criminals and heroes cannot be found in such a war. However, these features are not what we saw in the past wars because in the old wars, there are heroes, such as Fredrick, Napoleon, Hannibal who physically lead their soldiers in the front lines of the army, but this cannot be seen in this war because of the decline of individual’s role in the new war that the process is a cooperative affair rather than individual. Moreover, this new feature is the reason of not having “loin-hearted warriors” because if the leader is away from his soldiers, then who will motivate them and lead them physically to do their job. As he mentions that it is not a stock market for the generals to do their job far away from the center, but it is war and they needs to be at the center of the battlefield and seriously direct their army.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

The stories capture real life events of happenings on the battlefield and beyond but the author intentionally opts to portray the book as fictional rather than reality. In essence he justifies himself by claiming that it was difficult to account all these events especially after twenty years after the war. Furthermore, the characters in the book, his fellow soldiers contribute a lot to the stories within the book and the author isn’t sure that all the stories that they shared were genuinely true or were mere fairytales. The author successfully

Read More
1119 Words | 5 Pages

His jaw was in his throat. His one eye was shut, the other eye was a star-shaped hole. I killed him” (O’Brien 172). The purpose of a story-truth is to make his readers see what he saw, his memory, and whichever truth is told alters the answers to questions. Without them, there would almost be no point in asking questions, because there would be no truth to tell, all memories would be a

Read More
980 Words | 4 Pages

O'Brien is able to illustrate truth about the war to his readers through the use of cleverly crafted syntax and

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

“Look at Europe,they’ve had one war after another for hundreds of years and show me where anything got better for them” (Collier and Collier 28). The authors James Collier and Christopher Collier of My Brother Sam Is Dead both prove they are not against war, but at the same time, they prove war is okay in the story. They use their feelings about if war should be okay or not okay through Tim’s father. Sam,one of the characters and sibling of Tim, argue that that they should be fighting for freedom and his father argues that war is not worth it. Even though both sides are presented in the story, Collier and Collier conclusively claim in My Brother Sam Is Dead that war is brutal and pointless.

Read More
1423 Words | 6 Pages

One important reasons is that “story truth” can serve a purpose similar to that of a metaphor. In the chapters “Ambush” and “Field Trip,” O’Brien subtly makes the point that explaining what happened during the war to a civilian is similar to attempting to describe the adult world to a child. The things that children experience in the first few years of their lives do not prepare them to understand concepts such as death and loss. Therefore, in order to help them understand, the adult speaking them would have to compare these concepts to something that children are familiar with. Similarly, Tim O’Brien helps his readers begin to grasp the experience of being at war by explaining its impact in different

Read More
1519 Words | 7 Pages

War stories with meaning have to sugarcoat war to make it more appealing to the readers. Tim O’Brien writes about how this sugarcoating of is not a true war story. He explains, “A true war story is never moral. It does not instruct, nor encourage virtue, nor suggest models of proper human behavior, nor restrain men from doing the things men have always done” (O’Brien 316). The war stories with morals and deeper meaning gives war character which it does not have.

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

Although the concepts of truth are the same, no person will have the same exact definition of truth. Many people can share a truth, but none of them will always be the same. In O'Brien's The Things They Carried, there's an excerpt called How to Tell a True War Story, an example of O’Brien’s claim can be found when he talks about Mitchell Sanders’ story. It involves a troop that went into the mountains for a listening post operation. He mentions that these men began to hear strange echoes and music, which frightens them.

Read More
1938 Words | 8 Pages

What should we bargain in our education and what content should we write into the textbook to prevent the following generation from waging war? Concerning these enquires, which put forth by Virginia Woolf nearly a century ago, it seems the human race fails to give a satisfactory riposte. No matter how hard human beings have tried, war stays to be an inevitable matter. Some people state this frustrating and inescapable result is caused by human’s aggressive instinct: we are inherently violent and egocentric. However, is human nature truly so selfish and hostile that human race are doomed to be uneducable in war prevention?

Read More

More about The Things They Carried A War Story Analysis

Open Document