ipl-logo

The Trump Campaign And Cambridge Analytica

1760 Words8 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Electoral college analysis

3. U.S. Presidential Election of 2016: The Trump Campaign & Cambridge Analytica The controversially sardonic republican Donald Trump dominating the stage with immoderate statements on immigration and foreign policy, winning him a presidential election in the world’s most powerful and influential country is rather stranger than fiction. Trump’s remarkable rise from a mere political perspective to a trend, as seen in other Western countries, where outspoken outsiders have challenged and even defeated the political elite is simply unbelievable. His opposition, the democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, was someone with a high political pedigree as a former Secretary of State and US senator, and the then incumbent president Barrack Obama’s backing. …show more content…

Cambridge Analytica focussed its efforts on persuadable voters by providing valuable information to the Trump campaign’s activities in getting them to vote for him. This was how they identified swing states in the election and got Trump to hold rallies there. • Cambridge Analytica produced heat maps of persuadable voters, voters who had not made the decision yet. For instance, the state of Wisconsin. Wisconsin is a state that is traditionally a very safe democrat seat. So much so that the Clinton campaign never visited the state of Wisconsin in the entire election. Nevertheless, they were able to use data to identify that there were very large quantities of persuadable voters there that could be influenced to vote for the Trump campaign, and had five rallies there. • An Electoral College is not an easy one for any candidate in the race. The candidate could lose the popular vote and still be the president because of Electoral College votes. This is what happened in the case of Trump’s election. The digital team built a model, the “Battleground Optimizer Path to Victory”; to weigh and rank the states that the data team (Cambridge Analytica) believed were most critical to amassing the 270 electoral votes Trump needed to win the race. On oct.18 2016, Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Georgia were top on the list, all of which Trump went on to …show more content…

Cambridge Analytica was undertaking 3000-4000 thousand polls a month in order to inform reporting dashboards to help the campaign understand its resource allocation and to inform their predictive models about the audiences they needed to engage. The weekly polls provided a very powerful insight into tracking the electorate. When Trump’s Access Hollywood tape with Billy Bush was broadcast on national television, his ratings went down in some states while went up in others. Therefore, the digital team was quick to communicate this to the campaign and thereby they could allocate resources in a targeted

Show More
Related
275 Words | 2 Pages

Walter E. Williams discuss how Hillary Clinton blamed the electoral college for her losing the presidential election. Williams stated that many individuals believed that the electoral college is dangerous when it comes to American politics. Individuals also claims that there are three electoral votes, or one electoral vote per 200,000 people in the state of Wyoming which was another factor that weight in the presidential election. In California, one electoral vote equals 715,000 people. Williams also stated that there a lot of individual who complain about using the electoral college since they believe that it’s undemocratic.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

Trump's election

Read More
1804 Words | 8 Pages

Essentially, the biggest “state” to win changes from California, at 55, to the country itself, with 102 electoral votes. His goal was to almost entirely ensure that a candidate who won the popular vote would win the overall vote. By settling on a number like 102 Schlesinger is trying to ensure the popular vote winner is the overall winner. However, in an extremely unlikely scenario a candidate could still win the popular vote, along with the 102 bonus, and still lose in Electoral College votes. Normally a candidate needs to get to 270 votes to win the election.

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

Watching this year’s election was shocking. Against all predictions, against every analysis, Donald Trump became the president-elect of the United States. But were those predictions really off? As the LA Times put it,” Hillary Clinton got roughly the same number of votes that President Obama received four years ago en route to his reelection, but she nonetheless lost the presidency to Donald Trump, who came in at least 2.8 million votes behind her.” This is, of course, because of the electoral college.

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

The Electoral College requires a presidential candidate to have trans-regional appeal. Trans-regional appeal is when a presidential candidate tries to appeal to all or more than one region. No region has enough electoral votes to elect a president. For example, “So a solid regional favorite, such as Romney was in the South, has no incentive to campaign heavily in those states, for he gains no electoral votes by increasing his popularity in states that he knows he will.” The Electoral College makes it so that presidential candidates have to campaign in more than one region to get more support.

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

I must preface this discussion with the fact that I am anything but, pro Electoral College. Nonetheless, the Electoral College is a method of voting within our democracy, which each state is allocated a certain amount of “electors” who are sworn to vote for the candidate who wins the popular vote in their respective state. However, there are two exceptions to this rule, the states of Nebraska and Maine, which bifurcate their respective electoral votes in proportion to the popular vote. The quantity of electoral votes in any given state is grounded in the state’s congressional representation. Respectively, each state is afforded two votes for every Senator with an added vote for every member of the House of Representatives, which is in-turn grounded in volume of the state population.

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

During the election day Trump won the states that provided him with his victory like Florida and Pennsylvania. States should have the power of deciding the fate of the vote because the state regulates the people in their districts. They have earned the power to have a say what candidate should be selected. An election has to come down to what the states think about which candidate is the best to serve the country. The US Electoral Votes Map shows states like Florida, California, and Pennsylvania having high electoral votes (Document 2).

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

During the Cold War, the protracted indirect conflict between NATO and the USSR, one of the most important factors in getting the upper hand was control of resources. Without easy access healthy supplies of raw materials, not only would military competition with the other great superpower be hampered, but consumption, the main driving force of the American economy, would be diminished. This was the rationale behind the famous ‘proxy wars’ of the Cold War; wars which were fought not between the superpowers themselves, but between one superpower and the allies of the other. One of the first of these proxy wars, and one of the most devastating for the indigenous people, was the Korean War.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

First, with the specifications of the electoral college there only needs to be 270 electoral votes to a person for them to win. With this rule only 12 states need to be won CA, TX, FL, NY, IL, PA, OH, MI, GA, NC, and NJ(DOC A) and this is only a part of the overall population of America. While

Read More
1641 Words | 7 Pages

According to Robert Speel, a political author from Time magazine, Presidential candidates will still focus on the states where they can get the most electoral votes, which are the higher populated states. Robert Speel earned his Ph.D in political science from Cornell University and Bachelors from The University of Pennsylvania. In fact, Penn State University published his book, Changing Patterns of Voting in the Northern United States. Speel believes that presidential candidates typically campaign in at most 12 states based on the amount of electoral votes from those states. During the 2016 election, both parties spent a combined 87% of their campaign efforts in 12 different states (Speel, 2016); as a result, this

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

An example of making one of the polls biased would be if they only polled certain races, genders, social classes, or party affiliations (like polling only Republicans or Democrats because most people tend to vote for the candidate of their political

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

Candidates tend to spend a large portion of their time in these types of states to try and convert independents and members of the opposite party to vote for them. Some people argue that this swing state idea defeats the electoral college principle of evening out the power among the states, since the swing states get special attention. The other main issue is that the Electoral College often does not align with the popular vote. This argues against the evening out of power since, it matters more that a candidate collects more states than more people’s votes (“Understanding the Presidential Election”). In the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton secured the

Read More
1052 Words | 5 Pages

Full stop.” Donald Trump won at least 279 electoral votes and Hillary Clinton won 228. The Electoral College can make a win into a landslide. The Media itself hasn’t helped Hillary. In general, Twitter users were more favorable to Clinton than Trump in line with the snap polls.

Read More
1519 Words | 7 Pages

In elections, this is critical as certain geographic locations within a region are explored by candidates (Traugott, 2014). For instance, the national presidential election of 2012 focused 96 percent of advertising funds on only 10 states (Traugott, 2014). This concept explains the intense focus necessary for a candidate to obtain votes. The qualitative research process has advanced from traditional interviews to interaction on social media application. Some smartphone applications can provide researchers real time data during candidate debates from a large population (Traugott, 2014).

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

Fake news ties not only into the problems with today’s media, but also with communication, and real numerical facts. Although this may seem like a one hundred and eighty degree turn, similar to how a fake news article deals with current and emotional views, a poll allows us to visualize how the nation, or a select population of people, depending on the purpose of the survey, feels about a certain topic. While they are in no doubt an efficient way to collect large amount of data, if done incorrectly, errors can occur quite frequently, screwing or producing misleading results. Often overlooked, the who, how, and when a poll was taken can greatly affect the results.

Read More

More about The Trump Campaign And Cambridge Analytica

Related Topics

Open Document