Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American political system, pdf, essay
American presidential system
American voting system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American political system, pdf, essay
Gerrymandering is the process of redrawing boundaries to benefit the political party in power. An example is Nevada, in which the four districts show the three forms. Gerrymandering was made after Elbridge Gerry, who was the governor of Massachusetts and Vice President of the U.S., signed a bill that redistricted the state to benefit his party, which was later called Partisan Gerrymandering. An individual observed the oddly shaped district as a "gerrymander" causing a newspaper reporter to print a cartoon of a monster based on it.
Some obstacles that third parties face include voters believing that their vote for a third party candidate is a waste, since that candidate is unlikely to win. Also, third parties usually focus on a single personality or a single issue and that can lead to less popularity among voters. However, the most significant obstacle a third party faces is the winner-take-all system, where in the majority of states, the presidential candidate gets all the state’s electoral votes with the highest percentage of votes. This basically takes all the chances of a third party wining a presidential election.
Our political system is comprised of a two party system that has existed since our country's inception. While the Democrats and Republicans are the dominant parties, there are third-parties such as the Libertarians, the Tea Party, the Green Party and many others. While they are small and a third party candidate has never won a presidential election, they can have a significant effect on the outcome. Such examples include the Elections of 1912 and 1992, two years in which the election was changed by the actions of a third party candidate. This also applies to our current presidential election in which one of the Republican frontrunners, Donald Trump, has vowed to run as a third party candidate if he feels mistreated.
The electoral college is unfair to the third party because they don’t get votes from the electoral college. Based on the presidential election from 1980 and 1992, it have show that the third party don’t get electoral vote(Doc B). The third party have a disadvantage which make it impossible for the third party to win the election because of the “winner take it all” system. According to George Will, he say that it discriminate smaller party and only help the main two parties(Doc E). The electoral college supports a two party system, discourages third party, and thereby restrict choices available to the
The National Archives states that the electoral college doesn’t fare well for third parties. They emphasise this through Theodore Roosevelt's Progressive Party of 1912 and several important third parties, such as the Libertarian Party, hosted by Gary Johnson, and the Reform Party, hosted by the influential Ross Perot. Another good example of a third party that also coincides with the knowledge we have gained of late is the Socialist Party, with Eugene V. Debs as the host. Third parties do poorly due to the state's power of deciding how electors vote, as well as other parties' assimilating the third wheel’s ideals. The electoral college promotes a two-party system by giving larger recognition to more prominent parties.
Why has American political history been dominated by the two-party system? When and how have third (or fourth) parties challenged this status quo? The elections of 1796 changed the course of American politics forever. The 1796 elections were the first elections where the presidential candidates represented opposing organized political parties for a place in office. Political parties are alliances, “of like-minded people who work together to win elections and control of the government [...] for the ability to put their philosophies and policies into effect” (“Political Parties”).
The citizen would be voting for who they want instead of what others want which in the end is right. Another reason is the third party candidate can be a better option compared to the running candidates of the two main parties. If the two main parties don't believe in the same policies then the citizen will have a third option. For example in the current debate the two main parties have candidates that the people disagree with yet they still support them because of the two party system.
There is no real need for these parties. Most people would not agree with all of one party's ideas. Each issue will cause much more than two opinions, which is why parties are not needed. Political parties are more easily abolished without the useless Electoral College. This is all stated by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., ¨Electoral College Debate: Election 2000:
If there was three parties, and one of the parties won the election by a slight ⅓ vote, it would not be a majority of the people. Therefore the country would turn from a democratic republic to a whole different, less inviting arrangement. For example, In Australia, they are run by a Multi-Party system. The Australian Labor Party won with 35% of the popular vote. In Two-Party systems, it needs to be 51%.
The scope of the effect that a third party has in the United States is extremely limited. Not only do candidates from the Tea Party need to outcompete opposing members from the Democratic Party, but they also have to compete with members of the Republican Party, a party with which it shares very similar ideology. In order for third parties to successfully enact their agenda, minor parties like the Tea Party either have to influence the elections of major party candidates that they support, or prevent the elections of candidates they oppose. It is clearly possible for members of the Tea Party faction to reach positions of power. Several candidates have been elected to the U.S. Congress.
Furthermore, the Electoral College forces smaller parties to merge with one of the major parties, diluting their true cause. According to the aforementioned article, the People’s Party in 1896 had as high as forty-five percent support in over twenty states. However, they knew their candidate could not win the presidency because of the small amount of electoral votes for their supporting states in the Electoral College, so they hoped to unite with the Democrats rather than advocating for their own
They dealt with things like tax reforms, prohibition or alcohol and many other issues. They come forward when the public isn’t satisfied with the Democratic or Republican nominees and though they never win office they are quite important. Some of the most important issues in America were advocated by third parties first, for example; the Free Soilers of 1848 who advocated for anti-expansion of slavery and equal rights for enslaved blacks. Going back the Populists and Progressives, I believe they had one of the largest impacts.
INTRODUCTION The United States political structure is one of the most conducive and great political system in the world. One of the most popular aspects of it is the two party system, and the well-known Democratic and Republican parties. There are three major party systems in the world and they are one-party system, two-party system and multi-party system. This essay will analyse the two party system in the United States (U.S.), their structure and the benefits of a two party system in a states.
Although it would not become a lawless anarchy, it would become a dull, frail, lifeless government. Without the spark and fire of political parties, America would become lethargic and mundane. As previously stated; political parties are the heart and brain of America’s government. That means without political parties, America's government would become essentially lifeless. With that it can be said that political parties are essential and beneficial to America's government, people, and political
Political parties are politically recognized organizations of citizens who form to defend their interests. Having a political system that allows the freedom to form a new political parties or to declare membership in already existing ones, promotes democracy. As such, political parties are an indispensable part of the democratic process. However, there are also negative consequences to having political parties. Political parties saw their origins in the 17th and 18th centuries in the UK, evolving from previous political organizations called factions.