ipl-logo

Why Some Obstacles Third Parties Face

97 Words1 Pages
Some obstacles that third parties face include voters believing that their vote for a third party candidate is a waste, since that candidate is unlikely to win. Also, third parties usually focus on a single personality or a single issue and that can lead to less popularity among voters. However, the most significant obstacle a third party faces is the winner-take-all system, where in the majority of states, the presidential candidate gets all the state’s electoral votes with the highest percentage of votes. This basically takes all the chances of a third party wining a presidential election.
Show More
Related
389 Words | 2 Pages

If the United States had multiple parties, people could vote for what party actually matches their political views. A popular vote could promote a multiple party system, and in the instance that no candidate gets more than 40% of votes there could be a “second

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

Ralph Nader, in the 2000 election, was the Green Party Nominee for the presidential election, and when his comment that the throw-away mentality needs to be ended is directly opposed by the juxtaposition with the man’s vote for the Green Party going directly in the trash. The point of view expressed about minor parties through this cartoon is that third-party votes don’t matter and are essentially trash and a waste. Two rules that are obstacles to minor-party candidates winning elections is that: 1. Ballot-Laws are different for each state and usually they’re made more difficult for third-party nominees.

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

Sometimes it can be argued that the Electoral College gives candidates coming from third or independent parties no chance to win the election.

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

Our political system is comprised of a two party system that has existed since our country's inception. While the Democrats and Republicans are the dominant parties, there are third-parties such as the Libertarians, the Tea Party, the Green Party and many others. While they are small and a third party candidate has never won a presidential election, they can have a significant effect on the outcome. Such examples include the Elections of 1912 and 1992, two years in which the election was changed by the actions of a third party candidate. This also applies to our current presidential election in which one of the Republican frontrunners, Donald Trump, has vowed to run as a third party candidate if he feels mistreated.

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

A political party is two different organizations made up of people with different ideas for how the country should be run. They argue over “who is right”. People join political parties who have similar beliefs ( Doc 1). Jefferson and Hamilton created the first two political parties. Jefferson, the Democratic Republicans, and Hamilton, the Federalists, had very different ideas for the new nation.

Read More
1966 Words | 8 Pages

Another con of the Electoral college is that it leaves many unrepresented for. Most states are known to lean more toward a given party whether it be Democratic or Republican. Some voters who are of the opposite party might feel as if their vote is unnecessary and unimportant. A voter should not have to feel that way. To feel that because their state is mainly for another party their vote is irrelevant defeats the purpose of an election.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

The citizen would be voting for who they want instead of what others want which in the end is right. Another reason is the third party candidate can be a better option compared to the running candidates of the two main parties. If the two main parties don't believe in the same policies then the citizen will have a third option. For example in the current debate the two main parties have candidates that the people disagree with yet they still support them because of the two party system.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

If there was three parties, and one of the parties won the election by a slight ⅓ vote, it would not be a majority of the people. Therefore the country would turn from a democratic republic to a whole different, less inviting arrangement. For example, In Australia, they are run by a Multi-Party system. The Australian Labor Party won with 35% of the popular vote. In Two-Party systems, it needs to be 51%.

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

I personally feel I am more of a Democrat than a Republican. American Politics The two major political parties of the United States are the Democrats and the Republicans. There are also third parties such as the Constitution party, the Green party, the Independent party, and the Libertarian party. The Democratic and the Republican Party constantly compete with each other trying to promote their political ideals and searching the means for maintaining their continuous political leadership.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Along with keeping balance between the states, the Electoral College also helps keep independent parties under

Read More
351 Words | 2 Pages

The Third Party presidential candidates are often overlooked, or not taken seriously. After careful consideration, and acquainting myself with the many different Third Party candidates, it would be my choice to elect Dr. Jilll Stein. Her strong stand on environmental issues coincides with my concerns and beliefs when it comes to green energy and conservation. According to her campaign website, she is also a supporter of plans that would provide jobs, basic living necessities in an attempt to end poverty, healthcare, free education, equality for all, and a cut in military spending (Jill2016.com). Jill Stein’s vision may seem far-fetched but I believe that it is this kind of innovative, and optimistic plan that would be the most beneficial to

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

Granted a candidate would almost never win all eleven states because the majority of these states tend to be predominantly democrat or republic, the fact that only eleven states alone can determine who 's the president puts to question the value of the remaining 39 states. Document B, explains the winner-take-all method and how unfair the method is to third party candidates. The chart shows how even though both third party candidates won about 7% and 19% of the popular vote but won 0% of the electoral vote. In Document E, Will states “the winner-take-all electoral vote allocation tends to produce a winning margin that looks like national decisiveness” There are over 300 million people in the United States, but just 538 people get to decide

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

During the start of our world the framers of the Constitution despised the thought of their being political parties, many thought of political parties as being illegitimate they were unanimously against them and the emergence of the third parties in and their impact on politics in America was a strong one. The thought of having no parties didn’t last long and the very first third party came forward, the Anti-Masons. The Anti-Masons appeared in 1828 under the lead of Clay Whig after the disappearance of William Morgan. This third party was highly opposed to Free Masonry because back then you couldn’t become anything or move forward in society unless you were a Free Mason; this was near impossible considering that there was favoritism in that

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

The Electoral College system the founding fathers devised helps to balance out the power of the large, populous states. This system forces candidates to campaign in all states since they all carry some sway in the elections (“Understanding the Presidential Election”). However, other issues present themselves as well, like states with large independent voters that can be swayed and the issue that a candidate can lose the popular vote and win the election. The first issue is that states that are equally divided between democrats and republicans and hold a large number of electoral votes like Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania are considered swing states. (“Understanding the Presidential Election”)

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

Contra arguments Many scholars believe that direct democracy pave the way for citizens to give their opinion directly to formulate policy makings. Though it has a lot of advantages but many scholars outline the drawbacks of the direct democracy. Feld & Matsusaka (2000) found that cantons with mandatory referendums spend significantly less than other cantons based on panel data for all 26 cantons from 1980 to 1998. The estimate that the presence of a mandatory referendum with a spending threshold of 2.5 million Swiss francs (the sample median) is associated with 19% less expenditure per capita, holding constant other determinants of spending such as income.

Read More

More about Why Some Obstacles Third Parties Face

Open Document