ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Electoral College

436 Words2 Pages

The United States is a democracy, however not all votes from the people are technically counted for the final decision. How is this possible? The electoral college causes this to be so. Each state has a certain number of electoral votes, and if just 51% percent of the people in a state vote a certain way, all of that state's votes go towards that person. The electoral college is most definitely not fair, because every single person's vote should go towards the final decision of who rules them.
One scary thing to think about is what would be to happen in an election tie. In the event of a tie, the House of Representatives would break it. The votes would be very unfair. The representative from Wyoming who represents 500,000 people, would have the same amount of decision in the vote as the Californian representative who represents 35 million people. Thats 70 times the amount of people being represented by the same number of people. Source: Bradford Plumer, ¨The Indefensible Electoral College,” Mother Jones, October 8 2004
Some people may say that it does not really matter which voting process is used because the winning candidate will stay the same either way. This is absolutely not true. If the US had used popular vote versus electoral vote, this would would have changed the results of multiple past elections including but not limited to; the …show more content…

There is no real need for these parties. Most people would not agree with all of one party's ideas. Each issue will cause much more than two opinions, which is why parties are not needed. Political parties are more easily abolished without the useless Electoral College. This is all stated by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., ¨Electoral College Debate: Election 2000: Its a Mess, But We've Been Through It Before,” Time, November 20,

Open Document