Thomas Hobbes v. John Locke
The notion that political philosophy owes much to two English philosophers is indeed an undeniable fact. Undoubtedly, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and John Locke (1632-1704) immense contributions have not only had insightful, inspiration to philosophy but further still on our perception of the relationships between the government and the citizens. The two have not only profoundly have influenced modern day politics, the Declaration of Independence which is the foundation of the United States of America but most significantly human rights all over the world.
Although both were key contributors of the Age of Enlightenment and lived in the 17th century, there are very conspicuous similarities in their concepts and works. Undeniably, both believed in the social contract theory, as well as being contrasting the divine right. However, this paper nonetheless, will delve into the differences that exist between their opinions. However, the differences will be exclusively based on their works: the Two Treatises of Government by John Locke and Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan.
…show more content…
However, Hobbes desires the power of government to be inherent in a single person. He considers this form of government to be a more durable and stronger. He contends that if power is to be divided, governments would ultimately fall. He attributes this to his perception that the different factions would inevitably argue (Leviathan, pp. 368-73.). However, Locke conversely desires the protection of the citizen from the government; therefore, his desire is to see the separation of power. He reasons that in doing so will deter anyone authority from becoming too strong (Second Treatise pp.