In 1774, Thomas Paine left England and embarked his journey to America. While in America, he witnessed the tension among the colonists struggling with a dull government. Paine saw a lot of conflict and disorder that he was prompted to find an immediate solution. Thomas Paine discovered a great form his ideas could be heard, so he implemented his disputes in a pamphlet which was titled, Common Sense. The pamphlet was dreadfully seen as a confrontation for the British monarchy and cohorts. Surprisingly, the message was directed to the common people to advise them to ask for independence and once and for all break away from the British government. Although Thomas Paine argued that separating and becoming independent was the most rational solution, …show more content…
Anthony III Lewandowski (2013) pointed out that independence brings success like, “free trade with all nations, not just great Britain” (P.20). Economics innovation was an important factor Paine supports because he believed under the monarchy there will not be prosperity. He saw no point being stuck to one nation without the liberty of producing commerce with the entire world. The Author of Thomas Paine: Author of American Independence (2013) argues that there was a correlation between Paine’s vision about democracy and economy which says” Monarchies were more likely to go to war” (P.20). Pain was certain that monarchies were more liable to create warfare and mislead the economy. As a whole, he asserted that democracy is a way of guaranteeing security and prosperity in …show more content…
Once Common Sense was published, rebuttals were also coming from loyalists: Are colonists who remain loyal to the British Monarchy. Rev Charles Inglis was one of the many loyalists who counterattacks Paine’s pamphlet. Most loyalist, were mostly the wealthy colonists, and it is possible they believed their fortune was going to doom if they follow Paine’s proposition. Charles claimed that if there were to be no relationship with England, America had no promising future. They eventually lacked integrity and self-assurance and were unconvinced of a change in the colonies. Loyalists were very close-minded by the customary government, and they possibly let their pride take over preventing them to do critical examination of their own