ipl-logo

Tony Blair Interventionism

1821 Words8 Pages

Three core elements of Tony Blair’s 10-year tenure were an activist philosophy of
1. ‘Interventionism’
2. Preserving the strong alliance with the US
3. and positioning Britain at the heart of Europe.
Whereas the ‘special relationship’ and the Britain’s role in Europe have been central to British foreign policy since World War 2, interventionism is arguably a new element.
The advent of this interventionist policy was triggered by the 1999 Kosovo war. At the same time he made he made his now famous ‘Chicago speech’, which unveiled a ‘doctrine of the international community’. The events of 11th September 2001, however created a context in which the emerging concept of ‘humanitarian intervention’ was affected by the perceived imperatives of …show more content…

While at the White House, President Bill Clinton, he strongly advanced the idea of Britain as a ‘bridge’ between the US and Europe. Albeit having a similar ideological approach to things, Blair and Clinton weren’t always on the same page, for example over the Kosovo crisis. Lord Guthrie, who served as the senior UK military officer under both Major and Blair and so is uniquely qualified to speak to this comparison, suggests that Blair took a “much more forward leaning role” than his predecessor, and was, even prior to the Kosovo conflagration, “prepared and anxious that we should send our special forces out and capture war criminals who were actually being a malign influence on society”. Blair, Guthrie confirms, was “prepared to go in unilaterally”, and was frustrated both by the caution of the Americans and the torturous processes inherent in NATO decision making. He took bold decisions, and took them …show more content…

Successive governments have sought to respond to the blurring of the division between ‘foreign’ and ‘domestic issues’, and the revolution in communications. There were significant implications for the Foreign Commonwealth Offices’ overseas network as efforts were made to create more ‘joined up government’.
This is witnessed by the creation of the Department for International Development. This shifted the global development policy away from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to an independent ministry with a Cabinet-level minister, perhaps signifying a more centralized form of power.
During his time Blair also introduced, a public sector management philosophy that placed much greater emphasis on detailed target-setting and other means of measuring performance. These were loosely linked to a series of ‘efficiency’ and ‘effectiveness’ agendas. Public Service Agreements, Strategic Priorities and White Papers became an important part of the Foreign Policy lexicon albeit with a lot of

Show More
Related
687 Words | 3 Pages

The United States required a moral authority to justify militarization and intervention in a war that was not being fought on American soil. That moral authority was granted by the nation’s political leadership to defend democratic values globally, not just in the U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt claimed that the defense of “freedom and democratic values” now depended on U.S. leadership (Document

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

This becomes evident in September, 1940, when President Franklin Roosevelt decided to enter into an agreement with the British ambassador (Doc. F). The agreement provided Britain with critical destroyer ships from the United States for eight valuable defense base stations. When President Roosevelt decided to provide Britain with the destroyer ships it indicated a siding with the allies, and will change the mindset of most Americans to ‘all aid short of war” as neutrality was breached. Also, this change of stance came with Britain being the last one standing against Hitler within Europe since people feared the war reaching the Western Hemisphere, if not kept within Europe. In consideration to keeping the war out of America, President Franklin Roosevelt will highlight how ‘we’ must do everything to help the British Empire defend itself (Doc. H).

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

The Major years saw the UK pull out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) as it could not stop the pound from falling below a lower limit. ‘The subsequent prosperity of the U.K. during the mid-1990s was seen as happening in spite of government policy’ (Kenton, 2008). On foreign policy, Major’s administration will always be overshadowed by their actions (or lack of) over the Bosnian War. Many viewed the British Policy of non-intervention as fundamentally wrong, including one of the UK’s closest allies, the USA. Furthermore, polling done by Ipsos in July 1995 suggests 65% of the British public were dissatisfied with the government’s handling of the Bosnian War.

Read More
507 Words | 3 Pages

The British public were mesmerised by the measures taken by Blair and the Labour party to implement their domestic policy. The toughness on crime, investment in health & education was seen as such a positive by the public it warranted a re-election in 2001. This tell us that the view is valid as the British public were in owe off the Labour parties initial domestic policies. The pledges which were made by the party and were also exceeded by the party were so well accepted that the Labour leader Tony Blair was re-elected & therefore the domestic policies of the Labour party should be remembered in a positive

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

This is exactly the opposite of what President Roosevelt says during a press conference in 1940 (Document H). He uses an analogy and compares Britain to a neighbor with a burning home and the US has a hose they can use to put out the fire. At the same time he speaks about the US foreign policy in terms of using the hose, he tries to make the current policy look ridiculous and then speaks about another way to help the neighbor by lending the hose and getting it back later. He is speaking about the Lend Lease Act and believes that the US should do more to help its allies in need in Europe by lending them money and supplies and have it returned later. He is attempting to get away from old US foreign policy which was hurting the economies

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

Engaging in the topic of the Cold War and the tactics Reagan used to win, between the United States and The Soviet Union, Thatcher states that despite the pressure Reagan was under, he not only won the war but had done so “without firing a shot…” as well as inviting his enemies “out of their fortress and turning them into friends'' (39). Thatcher’s explanation of this is clear and understandable as it is known to the audience that Reagan accomplished things that worked out for the better of the country and avoided violence at all costs. It also goes to complete Reagan's exemplary image as he is seen as someone who can avoid violence as well as bring others together who used to be against each

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

Reagan said in his speech that daunting tasks like that of rebuilding nations, lives and governments were ahead. But he also said that, “the Allies summoned strength from the faith, belief, loyalty, and love of those who fell here. They built a new Europe together.” This shows the willingness and determination of those to make Europe more peaceful and better for all, even their enemies. He stated that there first occurred a great forgiveness between the Allies and the Axis, all whom have suffered immensely.

Read More
413 Words | 2 Pages

A renewed comprehension of these standards will permit us to justify actions abroad that advance our security and interests but temper that pursuit with a consciousness of our ethical commitments to different countries. The net impact of a renewed application of Founding principles would be a foreign policy that better promotes our good, the good of other countries and people, and the good of the world as a whole. Understanding the dangerous inadequacies of Progressive foreign policy, combined with a proper information of Founding foreign policy, will permit us to stay away from the pitfalls of two extremes in contemporary foreign policy: on the one extreme, a simply unbiased and idealistic foreign policy by which we interminably devote our military and other assets to the freedom and welfare of others and a policy of neutrality or intolerant self-enthusiasm by which both neglect forward-thinking actions necessary for our immediate and future security and miss genuine chances to help other people by prudentially advancing the universal principles to which we as a nation are committed.3 The loss of this conviction was the high cost of the Progressives' rebuilding of American foreign policy. A reestablished comprehension of the Founders' foreign policy is the way to reestablishing

Read More
1542 Words | 7 Pages

With great power comes great responsibility. That of moral, political and economic power has divided America into three different selections. That power must be managed and not push upon other countries and their views… we must be strong in our political moves, military gains, and economic growth. Which in turn scared our “ally” friends into believing we will take over there the way of life and turn it into an American way of

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

America had participated in its fair share of wars in the twentieth century. Germany as a whole had been in a political and economic drought ever since the last world war and Reagan was offering a hand of help through his speech when saying, “I understand the fear of war and the pain of division that afflict this continent – and I pledge to you my country’s efforts to help overcome these burdens.” Reagan had also held two summits with Secretary Gorbachev and wanted more. Reagan had been doing his part and clarified to the Secretary that his contribution and willingness to make changes was a necessity to future progression: “General Secretary Gorbachev if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate!” Tough love and bluntness often times are required to make actual change.

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

Foreign affairs are when you have an alliance with a foreign country. George Washington had great advice and took time to create this long address to help us and no one took it into consideration and now, unfortunately, he would be disappointed with our country today. One of the pieces of advice in Washington’s Farewell Address had to do with foreign affairs. Washington’s advice was to not get strong alliances with foreign countries. This is because if you get too entangled with a country there is no way out unless there's an app brawl.

Read More
2176 Words | 9 Pages

The Trilateral Commission wanted to create a complex interdependency by working with other nations to establish human rights. Carter took steps to reduce arms and the sale of armaments so that the threat of nuclear warfare would be reduced. Thus creating freedom from the fear of communism. During the Cold War Cater called for a new Foreign policy , one based on the idea the United States could help shape a new world rooted in good values, morals and optimism. This can be seen in his commencement speech on human rights and foreign policy at Notre Dame University when he states “t is a new world, but America should not fear it.

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

A combination of doctrines and emotions – belief in permanent and universal crisis, fear of communism, faith in the duty and right of the United States to intervene swiftly in every part of the world – had brought about an unprecedented centralization of decisions over war and peace in the presidency. ”(Schlesinger 208). Playing to the constant fear of communism emerging after World War II, presidents have used that as enough of a justification to send our troops away. Surpassing congress by saying we were in imminent danger and essentially, what

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

“Announcing War Against Iraq” Have you ever heard a speech that has affected you or made an impact upon your life? Well, the speech on “Announcing War Against Iraq” by President George H.W. Bush affected the lives of millions of Americans. This speech was given on January 16, 1991 and uses three motives of influencing Americans on the war against Iraq. This speech is remarkable because it influenced many people. It is highly regarded today because it announced a war upon Iraq.

Read More
1446 Words | 6 Pages

The invasion of Iraq echoes the ideological view of Woodrow Wilson, immediately following World War I. In Wilson’s opinion, his Liberal Internationalism was a cure-all end-all to conflicts between nations. His matrix of diagnoses and prescriptions

Read More

More about Tony Blair Interventionism

Related Topics

Open Document