Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five explores the relationship between time, war, and humanity; through the destruction and chaos he creates, he repeatedly questions the concept of free will: Billy Pilgrim, the protagonist of the book, becomes “unstuck in time”(Chapters 1, 23), he begins to experience time-travel and then encounters the Trafamadorians. Alien beings who perceive time nonlinearly also question the philosophical time limits of humans. Vonnegut suggests that a belief in free will is illusory; in fact, it is. Vonnegut’s novel shows the temporal chaos in human beings, and the Tralfamadorian perspective on time indicates that there is no such thing as free will, inevitably suggesting that all human action is an illusion inside the …show more content…
He is "unstuck in time" because he jumps from one moment of his life, as a soldier through World War II and into postwar life, to the future with his family. The temporal confusion is reflected in this continuously changing pattern of events, which challenges the idea of a linear progression from one event to another,“All moments, past, present, and future, always have existed, always will exist. The Tralfamadorians can look at all the different moments just the way we can look at a stretch of the Rocky Mountains, for instance.”(page 27) The idea of temporal chaos in humans, as well as the Tralfamadorian understanding of time, helps to support the notion of free will being a lie. The connection of all events, past, present, and future, as well as the ability of the Tralfamadorians to observe them as a whole, prove that the idea that human actions can change the course of events is false. It is also related to the bombing of Dresden, Billy being involved with World War II, and the bombing of Dresden were extremely traumatic experiences for him, and they left a lasting impression. His psychological wounds due to the pain and horrors he witnessed during the war are still present. His distorted sense of time and battle with PTSD are both caused by the horrors of war and the absence of free will, which is connected to Billy's military experiences. Billy struggles with the idea that things …show more content…
For instance, the bombing of Dresden is portrayed as a planned occurrence that cannot be changed, regardless of the decisions or deeds of individuals. This depiction emphasizes the idea that people are wrapped in a web of events that develops against their control.Vonnegut criticises the notion that people can shape or alter their fates by portraying events like the destruction of Dresden as predetermined and outside of their control. In order to make the point that people are subject to the whims of history and the broader systems in which they find themselves, he emphasises the breadth and complexity of the forces at play."So it goes." (Vonnegut 37) It is made repeatedly in the book to demonstrate how death is used to illustrate how events are cyclical and unchanging. Vonnegut repeatedly refers to death, implying that death is a natural element of existence and that it occurs regardless of one's intentions or effort. It is a reminder of the hopelessness of opposing or attempting to affect their path, which adds to the sense that events take place outside human control. "There was nothing I could do about it, except to remember it." (Vonnegut 24). Both quotes emphasize the inevitable and uncontrollable nature of events in the book, implying that people are trapped in situations that develop against their choice. They contribute to the