ipl-logo

To What Extent Did Roger Williams Justified The Killing Of Indians

432 Words2 Pages

Roger Williams, once a prominent member of the Puritans in Massachusetts, and the other
Puritan leaders acted very differently towards the Indians. He became a confirmed Separatist.
He came up with the idea of separation of church and state. He also believed the Indians had rights, as they were the original inhabitants of the land. Williams believed that the Indians had the right to their own land and the only way the English should be able to take it was thru legal purchase. Williams was banished by the colonial government for his beliefs. During his banishment, he lived with the Narragansett Indian tribe. The Indians took care of him and after that he felt the need to repay their kindness. He wanted to purchase land from them but the …show more content…

Most of the Indians believed in the Golden Rule-treating others the way they would want to be treated, much more so than the English settlers. The Puritans justified the killing of Indians by believing they were superior to them. They even believed they were superior to the ones who had converted to Christianity. They felt the Indians stood in the way of their expansion. “The colonists believed they had a God given right to settle this New World.” (colonialwarsct.org n.d.) They had the support of the king and queen. They had been authorized to take any land that was not already occupied by Christian settlers. The Puritans believed the Indians were agents of the devil, so they felt no remorse in killing them. In fact, they felt God provided the weaponry and enabled them to kill Indians with ease, and that this pleased God. The settlers believed that a small pox epidemic that wiped out many Indians was the work of God, clearing out room for them in the New World. The differences in the ways Roger Williams and the other Puritans treated the Indians

Show More
Related
1058 Words | 5 Pages

He instead formed a godly community, the Massachusetts Bay Colony, that was an example of reformers back home. Roger Williams was a political and religious leader who established Rhode Island in 1636. He encouraged the separation of the Church and the state in Colonial America. The way in which he viewed religious freedom matched his disapproval of the way in which Native Americans were being expropriated from their properties. His believes caused anger from his Church which in turn banished him from the

Read More
1301 Words | 6 Pages

He argued that the government should not coerce people to practice a particular religion and not punish them for not conforming. Williams believed in the toleration of all religions, including those that were not accepted by the Puritan faith. He believed that all individuals should be allowed to pursue their own beliefs without being persecuted. Williams was also an advocate for Native Americans and believed they had a right to their lands, and that the government should not take their lands without the proper

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

The American Revolution was the start of the America’s history and one of the biggest turning points in that era. All the colonists remembered the daring fight against Britain for land and liberty. Yet, 29 years later another war broke out between Britain and America. The same arguments were in place as before, America was pushing for land and defending their liberties. In these ways the War of 1812 can easily be viewed as the second American Revolution.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout history, countries have dissented and disagreed. In The Decline of Radicalism written by Daniel J. Boorstin, he stated that disagreement creates debate and dissent does not. Many events in history shows Daniel J. Boorsitin’s beliefs regarding World War I, the American Revolution, and Native American’s land stolen from Europeans. During 1990’s, many European countries wanted power around the world.

Read More
1127 Words | 5 Pages

Dawes Severalty Act De Juan Evans-Taylor Humboldt State University Abstract The Dawes Act of 1887, some of the time alluded to as the Dawes Severalty Act of 1887 or the General Allotment Act, was marked into law on January 8, 1887, by US President Grover Cleveland. This was approved by the president to appropriate and redistribute tribal grounds in the American West. It expressly tried to crush the social union of Indian tribes and to along these lines dispose of the rest of the remnants of Indian culture and society. Just by repudiating their own customs, it was accepted, could the Indians at any point turn out to be genuinely "American."

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

However, the Colonists believed that they were superior to the natives and had many men who believed that all the Indians should be dead, which developed into plans to kill all of them

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

In the Massachusetts Bay Colony, the Puritans, at first, established a good relationship with a Native American tribe called the Pequots. These quandaries were compounded by the Puritans' incrementing conviction that the Indians' claims were invalid, because God had bestowed

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

Should people be living together as one human race? Yes they should. That still does not mean they can . Individuals can not live together as “one human race” because they can not overlook race, they can not overlook religion, and they can not overlook the conflicts they have caused each other. It is important to think about what our world can be and what we want it to be, but also not to forget what our world is and what we can’t change.

Read More
497 Words | 2 Pages

When explorers first voyaged west, new towns sprouted in North America such as; Jamestown, Virginia and Plymouth, Massachusetts. These towns set laws and rights in which to obey on their long trip to the Americas. Eventually in the course of history the thirteen American Colonies we controlled by the English. The English were viewed as the mother country and profited greatly through trade and commerce within the colonies. Although over time the colonist government adopted British rights.

Read More
867 Words | 4 Pages

The narrative offers an account which can be used to describe the particularly puritan society based on the ideals of Christianity and the European culture. It offers a female perspective of the Native Americans who showed no respect to the other religious groups. The narrator makes serious observation about her captors noting the cultural differences as well as expectations from one another in the society. However, prejudice is evident throughout the text which makes the narratives unreliable in their details besides being written after the event had already happened which means that the narrator had was free to alter the events to create an account that favored her. Nonetheless, the narrative remains factually and historically useful in providing the insights into the tactics used by the Native Americans

Read More
374 Words | 2 Pages

The people of America (colonists) were tired of being controlled by England. They wanted to be free and independent. They believed that they were able to control themselves and be their own country. They wanted England to let go of their control and to view them as independent and their own country.

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

Although they were both christian puritans, John Eliots views were thatit was his civic duty to help the Indians by forcing his religion upon them, while Roger Williams though it was his civic duty to help the Indians get religious liberty. An example of Eliot forcing his religion on the Indians is seen when Governor John Endecott came away from the Natick settlement where John Eliot worked with the Indians amazed, he said “The Foundation is laid, and one that I verily beleeve the gates of Hell shall never prevaile against…. I could hardly refrain tears from very joy to see their diligent attention to the word first taught by one of the indians, who before his Exercise prayed…. With such reverence, zeale, good affection, and distinct utterance, that I could not but admire(Jarvis 57).”

Read More
1852 Words | 8 Pages

Williams had established a relationship with the Natives, specifically the Narragansett, who at first granted him land on the Seekonk River, but the Governor of Plymouth claimed that land belonged to Plymouth. The Narragansett, along with two other tribes, then granted him the land that would become Providence, Rhode Island, with Williams going on to write that Rhode Island was not bought by money but by love. Of course, it did not hurt for the Natives to have friendly relations with a white settler who would become an intermediary for the Natives. Williams views are rooted in his concept of the separation between Church and State, which led Williams to place importance on property. Williams believed that property rights were sustained by natural law and advocated liberty and equality both in land and government, and that the English were not landowners, but trespassers and if the English felt strongly about property rights then so did the Native Americans.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

The war was between Wampanoag and Puritans, which led to the end of Native American power in New England. Religion also influenced economic practices in colonial America. The Puritans believed in the idea of a "calling," the belief that God had given each person a specific role in society (American YAWP, 2.6). This belief led to a strong work ethic and an emphasis on industry. It also contributed to the development of the New England economy, which was based on trade, fishing, and agriculture.

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

He was banished in 1635 as a result of criticism from the Massachusetts Bay Colony elites who had established a theocratic political order, because he opposed the imposition of religious requirements for holding public office, the requirement that all citizens take an oath to God, and that all citizens attend church on a regular basis. Roger Williams believed that the colony had misunderstood what the Bible had to say about the separate roles of church and state in society. (Davis 203) He was concerned about safeguarding

Read More

More about To What Extent Did Roger Williams Justified The Killing Of Indians

Related Topics

Open Document