ipl-logo

To What Extent Was Julius Caesar A Good Man

589 Words3 Pages

Some people argue Julius Caesar was a good man because he was helping Rome, but I believe he wasn’t able to see the world wide enough for others. Although some people think Julius was a good man, this information is misleading because Julius Caesar was making the world a worse place because he started wars and forced people into his army. This has been shown throughout his life because he had bad relationships with others, he made rational decisions, and this all led to a horrific ending. First, Julius had bad relationships with others. For example, he had bad relationships with his wives. He only married because ne needed a child to be his heir. He married 3 women, but they all had daughters, after marrying for the fourth time j.c and Cleopatra had a son. This connects because he kept divorcing his wives only for his sake. In addition, is he had a bad relationship with the government and the senate. He total;y took over Rome and took dictatorship, he also did not agree with their decisions. This also connects because the government hated him, therefore he had a bad relationship with them. Last, he had a bad relationship with the citizens. This is because he claimed to have killed over 2,000 people in war. Also he forced them into his army. But he also made some rational decisions when he took dictatorship. …show more content…

Like in the last paragraph, it was his choice to take power over Rome, and also when he was a dictator, to kill people. When he forced them into his army, he was just focusing on himself, not the people. Although he was just doing all of this to save Rome, he was just going about it in a totally wrong way. In addition, he started wars, like the civil war with Pompey, which is how he became dictator. He also he went against the senate, because they were raising taxes. Julius Caesar didn’t want people in Rome to lose taxes. Last he decided to lower the rations so people would not have enough food or

Show More
Related
463 Words | 2 Pages

He fed the poor and made jobs. He wanted to support the ones who didn’t have much, “The hungry hordes in the city were now given free bread. Caesar created jobs” He was kind to all even those he had bad feelings about. Also in the reading “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” he was even kind to Cassius that seemed quite off to him but ignored it due to the wellbeing of others.

Read More
171 Words | 1 Pages

Julius Caesar did not govern fairly. I believe this because it seems like war and power were the only things this dictator wanted. For example, in "The rise of Julius Caesar" by Hal Marcovitz, it says "Caesar's ploy was not much of a gamble. His army easily swept aside his enemies, including his one-time ally, Pompey." This states that yes, Caesar was insanely strong and powerful, but getting rid of his one-time ally because he was supposedly in his way shows that he is not governing fair.

Read More
730 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar was a great leader who had many important impacts and influences on Rome. He guided his people through many troubles and overall helped them prosper, and he made choices that impacted his nation. He made choices and they impacted Rome, genres that authors use can help show people that. Gaius Julius Caesar was born on 100 B.C. Caesar’s family did not have influence or a lot of money but when Caesar became ruler of Rome he became one of the most rich influential people in Rome. Julius Caesar made many choices that had a very positive consequence for Rome and made Caesar many allies, however he also made many enemies.

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar was one of the most influential figures in ancient Rome, known for his ambitious military campaigns and role as dictator. While his rule was marked by controversy and ultimately led to his assassination, there were also many positive aspects to his reign. In this essay, we will explore the good things Julius Caesar did during his rule of Rome, the historical context in which he operated, the impact of his actions, influential individuals who contributed to his legacy, and potential future developments related to his rule. Julius Caesar came to power during a tumultuous period in Roman history. The Republic was in a state of unrest, with political factions vying for power and instability plaguing the government.

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

He was also was a very bad man. He would kill all people that would disagree with him, was a terrible leader, and weak. He was a terrible leader because he was not going to go to the traditional race at the festival of Lupercal. The only reason he was not going to go is because a soothsayer told him to beware the ides of March, March fifteenth to be specific. Julius Caesar is a man that the conspirators would consider a bad man.

Read More
1087 Words | 5 Pages

Caesar was still hungry for power, and as he took total control and became dictator, he soon made all decisions involving policies and

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

He was not as selfless as everyone said he was. He was said to be helpful to all Romans and listened to all Romans needs. According to UNRV History, “Caesar lost touch with reality and he put his face all over coins which was illegal back then. He also made the Romans build him a palace and he was also said to have sent squads to arrest anyone who said he was unfair or took liberty from the

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar was ruthless politically, declared dictator for life, he sought for power and glory in the government, which earned him a lot of people who hated him and sadly that was his fault. He also punished people who tried to change the traditions inside the government, which was selfish and not fair, and a hero would not do that. Thirdly, he added senators to the list of his suppoters, which was not nice politically inside the government and caused people inside the government to hate him more. He made his enemies inside his government because of his seeking for glory and messing up politically. Every hero has flaws though, and we can excuse him for doing that because everyone loved him.

Read More
230 Words | 1 Pages

Julius Caesar achieved such a great amount of influence after he vanquished Gaul and brought back much riches, most of the Romans loved and cherished him, yet some didn 't. He made more employments and numerous changes that helped poor ranchers, merchants, artisans. On the other hand he was the most recent in a long line of officers and tribunes who had misused their authority and harmed the republican foundations which were vital to the Roman government. He made himself out to be a king, something discredited by most romans since the fifth century BC when it turned into a full republic kept running by the senate rather than rulers. "Friends" of Caesar and other people 's issues with him was that they were jealous of him, their own

Read More
1871 Words | 8 Pages

Julius Caesar was a great leader, and warrior. His heroic figure that everyone cherished, and loved. He made many friends along the way, and he had a close bond with Brutus but doesn 'trealize that Brutus has begun thinking that Caesar is gaining too much power and he must die. He had some flaws of his own, but he had made many legal changes for the people of Rome so they would have a better life.

Read More
163 Words | 1 Pages

Julius Caesar is a tyrant and he was hated by the senate. He had all the power and controlled Rome. Julius Caesar is a tyrant and a dictator, dictators are supposed to step down after a crisis but he didn't. This tells people that Caesar wanted all the power to himself. Even when there are more people in the government Caesar controlled their power too.

Read More
1349 Words | 6 Pages

They were represented into monumental memories for their good deeds they both did for their people. There were both ingulfed in power, having too much power can be a good thing, but at the same time it can be self-destructive. Taking into consideration that these two men were powerful in politics, but it was that power that led to their deaths, and at the same time changing

Read More
387 Words | 2 Pages

He adopted a policy of special clemency, or mercy, toward his former enemies and rewarded political opponents with public office. For himself he adopted the old Roman position of dictator, a ruler with absolute power. There has been much debate about what political role Caesar planned for himself. He certainly thought the old government was weak and desired to replace it with some form of rule by a single leader. Just before his death, Caesar was appointed dictator for life.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

The final reason why Julius Caesar was a villain is the fact that he took action first without thinking about what the consequences would be. Some people might say that Caesar was a hero because he conquered new lands and saved Rome from the hardships of war. Except Caesar, like stated before, only cared about fame and wealth so, he sought out to conquer new lands when really he just started the wars and put Rome in a zone of danger. He started unnecessary wars without thinking about how the rise of taxes (due to the war) would affect the economic part of Rome and it’s citizens.

Read More

More about To What Extent Was Julius Caesar A Good Man

Related Topics

Open Document