ipl-logo

To What Extent Was Lincoln A Tyrant

495 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of lincolns emancipation proclamation

I believe Lincoln was not a tyrant. A tyrant is an oppressive ruler who abuse their power. He was introduced into office with a very difficult situation, therefore; he needed to extend the powers he was given to benefit the country. In the article,”Was Lincoln a Tyrant?” they mentioned a lot of things that made Lincoln look like a bad president, but he did it all for a reason. To benefit the country. The article said, “Lincoln’s reputation is less marred because his accrual of power was equal to the threat facing the nation.” The way lincoln responded to the situation was very appropriate. There was so much tension all over the country during this time and Lincoln had a goal to fix that and relieve as much of that tension as he possibly can, even if that includes stretching out his powers to the full potential. …show more content…

The reasoning for that thinking is that he over used his power. Also in the article, “Was Lincoln a Tyrant?”, there was a lot of information about why he was a tyrant. The article stated, “In the spring of 1862, Lincoln spent considerable time meeting with the Kentuckians, urging them to agree to compensated emancipation. Their resistance led Lincoln to write the preliminary proclamation in July.” A few paragraphs in this article made it seem like he was a very selfish man that got what he wanted when he wanted it. He didn't get what he wanted to he pushed back. In his term he made a lot of poor decisions that reflected his lousy personality. Not only that but the other way around as well. His lousy and unhappy personality led to very poor

Show More
Related
824 Words | 4 Pages

As Paludan puts it Lincoln, “ preserved the unity of the nation both in size and structure” and he continue to say, “because of Lincoln four million African Americans gained options beyond a life of slavery for themselves and their children”(242). Which I can agree with, but there is more to this story than Paludan is telling. Lincoln is perceived as a hero, but as Bradford has stated that, “the measure of his importance is that he was the heart of the major political events of his ear” and furthering this statement by saying, “the major charges advanced here, if proven, are sufficient enough to impeach the most famous of public men”(246). With in saying so Bradford is calling out Lincoln on his forced changes made as president made during this era. Which is agreed upon due to looking at most events that took place during Lincoln’s term; He always had a hand in the situation before they had become a major

Read More
219 Words | 1 Pages

He made it very clear that he didn’t want slavery to spread and would work to see that slavery didn’t spread. President Lincoln said if he could save the Union by keeping slavery where it already existed, he would do that. Saving the Union was his top priority. However, the South didn’t trust President Lincoln to keep his word.

Read More
1684 Words | 7 Pages

Even though many historians label Lincoln a dictator, “good”, “benevolent”, or even “great” accompany the title when describing him. Lincoln is considered a dictator for many reasons including, “launching a military invasion without the consent of Congress; suspending habeas corpus; imprisoning thousands of Northern citizens without trial for merely opposing his policies; censoring all telegraph communication and imprisoning dozens of opposition newspaper publishers; nationalizing the railroads…” (6). There are many examples of Lincoln’s role being more like a dictator than a president presented in the

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

Imperial presidency, the concept of the executive branch of the United States having supreme control or total control of the United States government and the other two branches. The executive branch would undermine the authority of the judicial and legislative branch and basically become the heart and soul of the United States government. There are many reasons why this could happen and why it would last. , Rather than having reliance on the cabinet secretaries, excessive reliance could be put instead on White House aides, the civil and political decay of the judicial and legislative branch, congress could isolate the president from members of the congress and the President could make decisions in secrecy, using his executive privileges to

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

Lincoln did this in order to get the United States on the same page because of the problems going on with the Union and the Confederates. He knew that in order for the US to get better and progress he had to make a change which was Reconstruction. December 1863 was when Reconstruction was brought to the House of Representatives and the White House as a whole. All in all, Lincoln planned out that Reconstruction would work in the slaves favor and his as well but it didn’t. Overall, Reconstruction wasn’t successful because instead of it benefiting African Americans it brought on many problems with only a few advantages.

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

In conclusion, all of Lincoln`s “controversial” decisions was to keep the union together. Its all justifiable even though these actions were technically an abuse of presidential power. It can be argued that he abused the power of the presidency when he suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus and upheld the Declaration of

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

President Lincoln had to make the best decision for the country, even if he did not satisfy the interests of both groups. Presidents should not appeal to majorities nor minorities, but overall, make the best decision for the country as seen with George Washington, as well as Abraham Lincoln. Each knew what was best in the end and that is what made him a great leader. If the government continues to apply filters of consent, prevent majority factions, and let the president make their own verdicts for the country, we will all be better

Read More
326 Words | 2 Pages

Abraham Lincoln’s assassination was unjust because he was a helper, and he was a role model; however, some believe he had too much power. There are many reasons why Abraham Lincoln’s assassination was unjust. First, it was unjust because he was a helper and he free the slaves. Also he helped out during the civil war.

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

However, according to the article “Abraham Lincoln and Civil Liberties in Wartime” the Emancipation Proclamation declared slaves in the states still in rebellion to be free. Since the slaves were property, Lincoln was practically stealing them from the people who had spent money to “own” them, taking away the property that at the time they had legally paid for. In that same article, it also directly states that nowhere in the Constitution does it authorize either Congress or the president to confiscate property without compensation, and even goes directly against that. Lincoln himself even seemed to question the lawfulness of his decision. According to the article mentioned before, “Lincoln’s Abuse of Power during the American Civil War”, in his first Inaugural Address he says, "I declare that I have no purpose directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of

Read More
3023 Words | 13 Pages

Constitutionally, Lincoln went beyond the powers the Constitution had vested in the presidency. The suspension of Habeas Corpus constitutes part of the powers granted to Congress by Article I, section 9. Similarly, the powers to raise and support armies are also vested within Congress. However, Lincoln’s desperate measures came in times of desperate needs. The legislative branch was in recess during this period and the executive took into his hands the power he felt necessary to deal with the civil

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

It has been affirmed that such charges against Abraham Lincoln, referring to the unwarranted accusations that has plague Mr. Lincoln, that he has suspended and violated the Constitution and committed treason against his own nation, are completely groundless. He has been tried for much misconduct as the President of the US, more specifically, he has been charged of committing murder, violating the first and Fifth Amendment rights of ordinary citizens and for invading a sovereign nation without congressional approval. Mr. Lincoln has done no such misconducts which warrant his presence in court, as such; he is innocent from these charges in every respect. Although the deaths of the many people who fought the Civil War were charged against him,

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

In addition, he was very clear that the southern states citizens shouldn’t be harmed by any means in spite of their demonstrations. The southern states demonstrated to try and protect their con-federal unity but they failed. The south reacted by sending delegations in Washington, offering to pay for the federal properties and trying to sign a treaty with the United States. But obviously they failed because Lincoln was very clear when he stated that the confederal union was illegal, therefore he refused any negotiations with the south – Confederal Union – since he declared that they are an illegal government any treaty with them would be a conflict to his words and that both union federal and confederal are in peace.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

The President unifies the crowd and reassures his divisive country that no side is to blame, it is simply an act from God. Lincoln, being president in one of our nation's toughest times, handles the pressure and power with grace and humility as conveyed in this

Read More
1309 Words | 6 Pages

This fact by itself emphasizes his worth as a president in being both a unifier and an overall leader. Mr. Lincoln’s vision of a more unified country encouraged him to make initiatives that helped to keep the union

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Picture in your mind a United States filled with safer citizens where lots of stores and banks worry less about the chance of robbery. This could happen if we allowed citizens the use of concealed handguns. I believe that since concealed handguns reduce crime, stop public shootings, and help people in times where law enforcement can't arrive soon enough, adults should have the right to own concealed handguns. One good reason is that allowing citizens to use concealed handguns reduces crime.

Read More

More about To What Extent Was Lincoln A Tyrant

Related Topics

Open Document