To What Extent Was Lincoln's Rationale For The Civil War

960 Words4 Pages

. What was Lincoln’s rationale for the defense of the Union? Lincoln put his personal beliefs aside and focused on the Union and balancing the cabinet. He wanted a variety of opinions as opposed to only his party. He made it very clear that secession was illegal and was a rejection of democracy. He much rather preferred the South to be reentered into the Union and reassured the Southerners that the slavery institution was safe. In the beginning, he wanted to take conservative steps and opted to send supplies to Fort Sumter and Fort Pickens. Unfortunately, this caused panic for the Southerners and they attacked. Lincoln was not too focused on the war, but after Bull Run he devised a stronger plan to win the war. He focused making sure the United States would remain a democratic country. He expressed his goal of keeping an organized Union and his belief that he did not want to abolish slavery, just keep it from expanding. 2. What was the northern strategy at the beginning of …show more content…

They were confident and felt that it was just a political maneuver. It was sure to be an easy win. People even came to watch the battle because they did not think it was a big deal. However, after the battle at Potomac, Bull Run, northerners realized what they were up against. After the Southerners counterattacked, General Irvin McDowell ordered for a retreat and abandoned their weapons. From then on, Northerners were more strategic. The first part of Lincoln’s plan was the Anaconda Plan. A blockade would form around all Southern ports and hopefully gain control of the Mississippi river. A new army led by General George B. McCellan would be formed at Washington to invade Virginia. Northerners were eager to win the war but General McCellan considered it a “gentlemanly contest”. He wanted to go at a leisurely pace and limited stakes. McCellan had a change to end the war with a final attack but instead choose not