ipl-logo

Tom Regan The Case For Animal Rights Essay

482 Words2 Pages

Countless mouthwatering recipes features animals seasoned to perfection. For centuries, the muscle and bones of animals provide nourishment to satisfy the stomachs of many humans. According to the Humane Society, close to five billion animals make their way from the pot to the plate every year (States). Repulsed by such statistics and practices of animal consumption, Tom Regan writes to defend the lives of animals. At the beginning of the world, animals lived in harmony with humanity, but once humanity committed the first sin, death clenched its death grip on all that had the breath of life within them. With death imminently shrouding animals, God gave them to humans to enjoy for nourishment. Until this temporal world gives way to an eternal world, God calls humanity to care and consume animals instead of venerating and preserving them. In his book The case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan put to paper his convictions concerning the injustice which animals endure due to the lack of unity between animals and humanity. Instead of turning numb to the suffering of animals when humans slaughter them for meat, Albert Schweitzer calls humanity to feel the animals’ pains and to stand up for the animals by an inward unification (Stewards). Regan urges humanity to unite with the animals because of …show more content…

This life given to them by God must be treasured and protected. Life is a gift. Regan notes how both humans and animals possess value because they are alive. Unlike animals, humanity possess the ability to take and save a life. Humans therefore have an added responsibility to protect the lives of fellow human beings as well as animals. The reason why Regan needs to speak strongly about his convictions is because humanity has neglected to protect the lives of animals. Regan works hard to awaken humanity to their responsibility to keep the breath of life within the lungs of humanity and animals

Show More
Related

Summary Of Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals

248 Words | 1 Pages

In the op-ed piece “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin emphasizes the similarities between humans and animals by providing results on scientific research studies to illustrate that humans should be more empathetic towards animals. In addition, he further explains how research results have changed the ways humans perceived animals and indicates solutions that were taken by other countries and organizations to help improve and protect animal rights. Rifkin provides examples that demonstrate animals have emotions, conceptual abilities, self awareness, and a sense of individualism just like humans. For example, Pigs crave for affection and get depressed easily when isolated, two birds Betty and Abel have tool making skills, Koko

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Factory Farming By Matthew Scully

1104 Words | 5 Pages

To begin, when talking about animals it can be a very sensitive subject mainly because the way animals are treated on farms, and how no one feels the need to question these actions. This is because many people feel this issue doesn’t concern them. In this essay Matthew Scully discusses the issue on how animals are treated and how they should be given more respect, and attention. Matthew Scully argues that animals in these factory farms are wrongfully treated, he uses biblical references and addresses the morals of humans to get conservatives to act on this matter.

Read More

Peter Singer Utilitarianism

870 Words | 4 Pages

Peter Singer, a utilitarian philosopher argues that non-human species should be treated equally to human species. Singer mentions that anyone who doesn’t believe in equal rights for animals is called a speciesist. Singer also goes into detail about how human speciesists believe that the pain felt by pigs or mice is not equal to the pain experienced by humans. In this essay, I would like to defend Singer’s argument, killing animals is not justifiable. Therefore, we should stop consuming animals by becoming a vegetarian or a vegan.

Read More

Bioethical Analysis Of Animal Liberation By Peter Singer

1407 Words | 6 Pages

Animal Liberation Peter Singer, Bioethicist at Princeton University, wrote a compelling essay called “Animal Liberation.” This 1973 essay is still very much relevant today. The title itself is pretty straightforward. Singer, states the problem of man eating animals and wants to get it liberated. In a dry and but convincing tone, Peter uses many good points to strengthen his claim including the book, Animals, Men and Morals, said to the “manifesto” for the animal liberation.

Read More

Matheny's Arguments Against Utilitarianism

1306 Words | 6 Pages

Utilitarians are confident that non-human animals are sentient. Sentience is having the ability to experience both pleasure and pain. Matheny conveys his feelings towards meet eaters, the experimental use of animals, and humans’ treatment of wildlife by listing

Read More

Immanuel Kant Against Animal Rights

1273 Words | 6 Pages

All these are certainly enough to intrigue even the most minimally curious among us. But do they provide support for the view that these beings have moral rights?” (1986/87, p.192-193) This article highlights irreconcilable conflict between the two sides. Jan Narveson addresses Tom Regan, the author of The Case for Animal Rights, “he in the preceding argument, refers to just anybody who doesn 't already accept whatever moral principle we are trying to establish.

Read More

Methylmercury: The Ethics Of Shark Fin Soup

756 Words | 4 Pages

Therefore, rather than basing rights off of those traits make it a vulnerability discourse. There are two main animal equality arguments, Peter Singer’s Utilitarian theory, and Tom Regan’s moral recognition theory. Singer argues, “human preference for humans rests on an unsupportable biological distinction vis-a`-vis all other animals”. While Tom Regan states, “that all beings who are ‘‘subjects-of-a-life” should receive the moral recognition and legal protection that rights afford”. The problem with the

Read More

Scruton's Arguments About The Position Of Animals

1461 Words | 6 Pages

Singer and Scruton both present arguments about the position that animals hold in our moral sphere. Singer presents the argument that animals ought to be fully integrated into our moral community and treated equally to humans. Scruton makes a moral distinction between humans and animals, and believes that we are justified in domesticating and eating them. I agree with Scruton’s point that humans should be treated uniquely from animals and that humans do have something morally distinct about them. However, it is important to understand that animals do have the capacity to suffer and we should not exploit them strictly because we find their meat appetizing.

Read More

Kant's Theory As A Deontologist

1387 Words | 6 Pages

What sets animals aside from humans is that animals are not capable of intellectual capacity such that they lack the ability of intrinsic value and moral autonomy. Humans have the right to treat animals as objects as humans hold the position of a higher hierarchy in all organisms. Humans can treat animals as objects so long as they are not treated as a means of a tool. If a human being were to inflict unnecessary harm to an animal, it would reflect on the human’s character and create the ability for the human to inflict harm on its species. [Humans have a duty and responsibility to care for others whether it being, other people, non-humans, the environment or future generations.

Read More

Kant On Animals

696 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, the overlapping ideas, regarding the equality of animals, and how humans should distinguish and defend the rights, or lack thereof, of animals, shows that no concrete, purely scientific answer exists. Instead, it is human opinion of a rather non-human focus that gnaws and drives animal’s rights controversies

Read More

The Ethical Debates About Animal Rights

1369 Words | 6 Pages

Eugene Prude 8 Dec. 2014 1123- 04 ELP150 There are speculations about animal rights. In particular there are two philosophers that argue each other about the topic. Peter Singer argues that “animals do have rights”.

Read More

Arguments Against Animal Rights

725 Words | 3 Pages

In the 1970s the humane movement began to find its first respectable intellectual and ethical underpinning in the work of philosophers Peter Singer and Tom Regan. The reason because animal rights were started was because animal cruelty which can take many different forms. It includes overt and intentional acts of violence towards animals, but it also includes animal neglect or the failure to provide for the welfare of an animal under one’s control; most animal welfare Acts will provide particular examples of cruelty. These may include: torturing or beating an animal, confining or transporting an animal in a way that is inappropriate for its welfare, killing an animal in an inhumane manner, failing to provide appropriate or adequate food or water for an animal, failing to provide appropriate treatment for disease or injury, failing to provide appropriate living

Read More

Arguments For Animal Rights

692 Words | 3 Pages

P (Animal Liberation) 1975 outlining that more humans ought to speak out for animal rights because animals have no way to express their feelings and emotions. Singer also says ‘Should thousands or animals suffer so that a new kind of lipstick or floor wax can be put on the market’ expressing that animals suffer for human aggression and for unnecessary luxuries. I believe that because we are at the top of the food chain, it doesn’t mean we decide the fate of other animals. Safran Foer. J (Eating Animals) 2009 states that us humans are ‘equally responsible for what we don’t do’ observing that not helping animals and guaranteeing them safety from inhumane killings.

Read More

Kam An Ethical And Psychological Analysis Of The Doctrine Of Karma In Buddhism

2076 Words | 9 Pages

It is simply known as the inherent value of animals. Inherent value is something that explains the value of existence as an individual in the world (The Case for Animal Rights 185). Tom Regan, an American philosopher, professor emeritus of philosophy at North Carolina State University who specializes in animal rights theory explains that regardless of race, status and human and non-human beings, every living beings has its own inherent value of the earth (187). He continually emphasized that there are no differences that both animal and human souls are mortal, so it should not be discriminated with its intrinsic value. Additionally, science contributes to following ethical value in researches using animals.

Read More

Animal Extinction

747 Words | 3 Pages

Between 1960 and 2000, the human population `throughout the world has doubled, but the animal population has declined by 30%. This is an overwhelming fact, yet it is a staggering reality that will only get more atrocious If the human race continues to act in this self-centered way that is a cycle that has been going on for centuries. Human requisites should not be prioritized over the requisites of animals and the planet because this will disrupt the delicate balance of the ecosystem and will eventually lead to the annihilation of the planet and the human race. Harmony is needed in everything, including our planet, to function so we can live on it.

Read More

More about Tom Regan The Case For Animal Rights Essay

Related Topics

Open Document