Jack and his hunters at the age of 12, have committed murder on Simon and Piggy and attempted murder on Ralph. Jack and his hunters should stand trial as children, because of the circumstances of maturity and judgment at their young age yet the brutality of the crime committed. The circumstances are these; Jack and his hunters were stranded on an island, alone, although along with other boys, for a long time being a 3-4 month period, and without adults and their judgment to guide them to safe and civilized decisions. However, when left to their own devices, Jack and his hunters still chose the act of murder when the other boys had not, but at the same time they weren’t in the best setting to think their actions through. Although 2 of 3 crimes were an act of hatred and …show more content…
When they committed the murder, no one who participated realized that it was Simon, they believed it was a beast. Given that they were pre-teen boys alone on an island, it is understandable that they could have believed of a beast lurking on the island. As a child it is natural to believe in something fictitious to fear, meaning that this in fact was a child crime. At the time of the crime rain was pouring, lightning struck as well as thunder, and suddenly Jack and his hunters saw a distorted figure crawl out of the forest, no other to bring them to believe it was a beast that was crawling out of the forest. The terrifying setting which stimulated fear in the hunters is described in the Lord of the Flies, “The hunters were looking uneasily at the sky, flinching from the stroke of the drops…The flickering light became brighter and the blows of the thunder were only just bearable…A thing was crawling out of the forest. It became darkly, uncertainly. The shrill screaming that rose before the beast was like a pain.” In such terrifying settings for a child, especially when in belief of a beast, will lead a child to quickly overreact to extremes without thinking things through, and to not