ipl-logo

Treaties Vs First Nations

462 Words2 Pages

In 1871, the first treaty was signed in Fort Garry, Manitoba. This treaty set the tone for the rest of the treaties that the Crown made with the First Nations People. Although the treaties were written documents there was a vastly different understanding with what the First Nations understood and what the Crown understood.

The First Nations people had a vastly different understanding of what the treaties they signed actually said and what they thought they said. To the First Nations people they were agreements to secure their recognition of their tenure in a time of tumultuous change, secure new relationships between nations, and to gain a new trade partner. The treaties were considered sacred agreements that meant God and the Creator were watching. From the First Nation’s peoples’ perspective they were promised they would receive items such as coats, farming equipment, tools, and livestock. Probably the most important part of the treaty agreements between the two nations was that the First Nations would not lose control over themselves. They understood that they would have continued control over their institutions, government, laws, and ways of life.

The Crown had different understanding of the treaties because were clear legal documents that had specific points as to what would happen. The treaties were impediments to colonial settlement and it …show more content…

When explaining the treaties to the First Nations chiefs it was primarily, if not fully in English. This was confusing for the First Nation’s chiefs because they spoke little to no English. Another area of confusion was that when being told about the different parts of the treaty, the good parts were talked in length while the negative aspects were quickly and briefly skimmed over. This added to the difference in understanding between the two

Open Document