ipl-logo

Tsar Nicholas II's Autocratic Ruling Of Russia

473 Words2 Pages

Tsar Nicholas II’s autocratic ruling of Russia contributed to a variety of problems in which Nicholas II failed to address, as he believed that he was appointed by God to rule Russia and continue to the autocratic system of ruling which he inherited from his father, and grandfather before him. Nicholas II had mixed emotions about ruling Russia, which was detrimental in bringing about his undoing, due to the simple fact that he knew nothing about being a successful Tsar. In a letter to his brother in law, Nicholas expresses his discontent of becoming Tsar. “What is going to happen to me…to mother, to all of Russia. I am not prepared to be a Tsar. I never wanted to become one. I know nothing about the business of ruling. I have no idea of even …show more content…

Seton-Watson, a British Historian stated “He was a devoted husband and father, loved the country and wildlife, and was a good landlord. Of constitutional, social and economic problems, he understood little.” In the matter of demands for political freedom and equal rights, the Tsar turned a deaf ear to constant liberals. His belief that it was his right to have unlimited control over the Russian people was of more importance than the harsh lives of the Russian peasants which formed 70% of his subjects. His inability to understand the existing social conditions in Russia and needs of the lower social classes enhanced the Tsar’s ignorance towards issues that Russia was confronted with within the 20th century. Nicholas’ ruling of Russia was criticised by many. ‘The young emperor evidently was shy about taking his proper place; he is lost in the mass foreign royalties and grand dukes who surround him’, stated Count V. Lamsdorff in his diary. The following year showed no improvement in Nicholas’ reign, Count V. Lamsdorff writing that “His majesty still lacks the external appearance and manner of an emperor.” This evidently provides further evidence suggesting that Nicholas was incapable of ruling Russia as he complained about the amount of work and people around

Show More
Related

Psycho-Japanese War Dbq

698 Words | 3 Pages

Nicholas II was extremely strict when it came to his government and as a result forbade any form of democracy in Russia and imposed absolute autocracy on all the citizens. His domestic policy was so strict political parties were illegal to form and he even made the Okhrana, a secret police that arrested and imprisoned any political critics, rebels, or those who voiced a negative opinion against the Russian autocracy. As a result, the citizens, especially those of lower class, despised the government and would often attempt to revolt. However, since the revolts were unorganized and ineffective, Nicholas II was able to end them very swiftly. After the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War in 1905, Russia suffered extreme humiliation as well as economic decline.

Read More

Tsar Nicholas II: Determining Factor In The Decline Of The Romanov Dynasty

911 Words | 4 Pages

Nicholas being notorious for disregarding advice, which led to his inexperienced political decision-making, as evidenced by source D. Rodzianko advises the Tsar to form a new government to save the Romanov Dynasty. Nicholas's response, "That fat

Read More

How Did Peter The Great Tear Russian Society

1633 Words | 7 Pages

It can be argued that Peter the Great had a lot to pick up after, especially following Ivan IV’s reign, the Time of Troubles, false Tsardom, and the great Raskol. However, Peter the Great creatively used all of these disadvantages to his own advantage. Rather than “tearing apart” society, Peter the Great reoriented Russian society by means of merit and collective productive contribution to society. Although it can be disputed “whether Peter the Great was a “revolutionary” tsar, Peter’s immense impact on Russia’s service system is simply undeniable” (Kaiser and Marker 226). It was perhaps Peter’s different upbringing that allowed him to formulate such distinguishable values that the country ran on during his reign.

Read More

The Romanov Family: Standing For Imperial Russia

309 Words | 2 Pages

Its was expected of him since his grandfather Ivan III made the Grand Duchy of Moscow into a dominant Russian state and was affecting the ruler of Russia. Ivan IV ruled from 1547-1584 when his mental capabilities stated to decline and affect his reign. Since his chosen heir dyed, Simeon Bekbulatovich was commander of main regiment of the Livonian war and appointed grand prince of all Russia. Later

Read More

Who Is Peter The Great Ruler Of Russia

1581 Words | 7 Pages

By attempting to cultivate the western European way of life, Peter made Russia diplomatic, military, political, commercial, scholastic, literary, and industrial (“Peter I.” 1). During his reign Peter the Great developed a number of policies, and he dramatically reformed his country. Like any ruler, Peter encountered a few problematic incidents,

Read More

Joseph Stalin Dbq Essay

696 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Russia’s history, there have been many rulers that tried to manage their country in different ways. Even though, all of these rulers had their own unique ways of ruling, all of them were seen as terrible by the people. This eventually led to a tipping point for the Russian citizens and the Russian Revolution took place. The goal for these people was to gain freedom from their oppressive czar but instead, they got an even worse leader. Joseph Stalin was a leader of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953 and he was known for his ability to strike fear into people.

Read More

Peter The Great Influence On Russian Culture

486 Words | 2 Pages

During his reign, he established churches and universities and enforced compulsory education so that his people could be educated and help in the development of Russia. One of the major changes in Russian culture was the shaving of the beards. He wanted to import western manners, dress and style into Russian society. Therefore, when he returned from the west, he demanded that beards be cut and foreign dress be worn.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Alexander The Great

1076 Words | 5 Pages

Alexander the Great was known as one of the greatest leaders in all the Ancient Western World but, there is a darker side to his legacy. Alexander the Great should not be notorious for being a great leader who spread greek culture throughout the ancient world but as the man who had an unbeatable military, killed innocent people and had a military strategy that was to destroy and obliterate. Alexander the Great had full control of anything he touched. He was one of the wealthiest people to ever live and abused his powers of being leader of at the time, one of the most powerful nations in the world. Overall, Alexander the great should not be held to the name Alexander the Great because it wasn’t his battle tactics and knowledge that lead him to never lose a battle but it was the sheer quantity and skill of his military that made them great.

Read More

How Did Tsar Nicholas II's Impact On Russia

716 Words | 3 Pages

Influenced mostly by Konstantin and his father, he became a strong believer in autocracy (system of government by one person with absolute power). Later on, when Nicholas II

Read More

Tsar Leadership Before The 1905 Russian Revolution

904 Words | 4 Pages

The Tsar leadership before the 1905 Russian Revolution was not supported by the Russian people. Tsar Nicholas II inherited the throne in 1894 when his father Alexander III passed. Alexander III believed in ruling Russia with an autocracy, when Tsar Nicholas II inherited the throne he wanted to do right by his father by upholding the autocracy. Tsar Nicholas II’s wife Alexandra highly influenced Nicholas’s autocratic tendencies. Majority of the Russian people believed that Alexandra had too much of a significant impact on the Tsar leadership.

Read More

Last Of The Czar Movie Analysis

964 Words | 4 Pages

The most famous one was the Chairman of the State Duma, Mikhail Rodzianko, he said to his emperor: “I implore you my sovereign, banish this dirty interloper from the court.” The Czar then replied: “No, I cannot promise you that.” Mistakes followed by mistakes, Nicholas II’s reign started to ruin when he decided to command the troops in World War I and leave the whole of Russia to his wife and Rasputin as adviser. The Czar’s foolish in “leaving the inexperienced and untalented Alexandra to run the empire along with the evil and ambitious Rasputin” paved the way for the destruction of the 300 year-long Romanov dynasty. That was

Read More

Vladimir Lenin's Animal Farm And The Russian Revolution

966 Words | 4 Pages

Similarly, Czar Nicholas II was an unfit ruler since he was never properly taught how to rule. Due to both of their inability to rule, it resulted in the animals and people being neglected and forgotten

Read More

Women's Jobs In Ww1

1592 Words | 7 Pages

World War One brought several changes to people’s lives and countries as they went to war with one another. With majority of men leaving to go fight, the spaces left in their jobs needed to be filled. Therefore, women needed to give up their traditional roles inside the home doing ‘feminine jobs’, and instead go help with the war effort by filling those gaps. “There were many areas of work where women had not been seen before”. World War One brought changes to women’s jobs, as women were seen - for the first time - in what were considered to be men’s jobs, they travelled overseas to serve in the workforce, and new uniformed services were established for them to join the armed forces.

Read More

Was The Russian Revolution Inevitable Essay

716 Words | 3 Pages

The Russian Revolution could have been halted or prevented if, in early times, Russia was given a czar with more experience

Read More

Vladimir Putin's Leadership Analysis

779 Words | 4 Pages

Through his role model of a true leader and his great charisma he influenced the Russian citizens to contribute towards his vision of a greater Russia. Vladimir Putin is seen, as a strong leader with brilliant psychological skills that had the power and will to make the decisions and take crazy risks, which he thought, was right for Russian citizens. He was highly people oriented since he new the culture and came from the same background as many Russian individuals and he new what they exactly needed and wanted in a president. But on the contrary his management background helped him to direct and control the Russian citizens by coordinating and harmonizing them to accomplish a mutual goal that was based on their needs and wants. Vladimir Putin created strategies, policies based on the Russian culture, values and views.

Read More

More about Tsar Nicholas II's Autocratic Ruling Of Russia

Related Topics

Open Document