Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fourth amendment analysis
Research question on the 4th amendment
Fourth amendment analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fourth amendment analysis
Research question on the 4th amendment
Fourth amendment analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Given the totality of circumstances, an officer has satisfied the probable cause standard to arrest an individual believing that a felony is or has occurred in the officer’s presents. This type of warrantless arrest does not violate an individual’s Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Decision: Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered the Court’s opinion on this case. The Fourth Amendment guarantees that citizens “are to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause” This right is pushed down to the state level by way of the Fourteenth Amendment. This ensures that warrantless arrests can be conducted by police officers when the standard of probable cause has been met.
The case of California v. Greenwood involves police who were investigating a potential drug trafficker, Greenwood. The police, who were acting on information that suggested that Greenwood could possibly be engaged in narcotics trafficking, obtained trash that Greenwood had left on the curb in front of his home. Considering the trash included items indicative of narcotics use, the police then obtained warrants to search Greenwood’s home, discovered controlled substances during their searches, and subsequently arrested respondents on felony narcotics charges. The issue in this case was whether the Fourth Amendment prohibits the warrantless search and seizure of trash left for collection outside the curtilage of a home.
Another officer arrived on the scene and they search the student’s room and found additional drugs. The student (roommate of the original student) was charged with possession of a controlled substance. Issues The issue to be determined in this case is “Did the officer 's seizure of the drugs violate Chrisman 's "reasonable expectation of privacy" guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment?” Holdings
Miranda Lambert Covers Willin ' at Concert One of the reasons Miranda Lambert holds the record for most consecutive Female Vocalist of the Year Awards is because she 's puts on an amazing show. Her latest tour, Keeping the Flame Tour, just got on the road on May 14th and she is already amazing fans. Between belting out her top hits and killing stray beach balls that were thrown on stage, Lambert took time to cover some of her favorite songs. One of the most special of the night was her rendition of Willin '.
[1] Decision: In this case it was found that the officer did have probable cause to believe that the crime of possession of the cocaine was that of Pringle. Due to this the arrest did not contravene the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. So, the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Maryland was reversed, leaving the case remanded for any further proceedings and is not inconsistent with the opinion of the Court. [1] Comment: This case shows a warrantless search and arrest based on what the officer sees with his belief that a crime is being committed or that it has been committed. Resources: 1.
Where there was no probable cause to arrest Hayes, no consent to go to the police station, and no prior judicial authorization for detaining him, the investigative detention at the station for fingerprinting purposes violated Hayes rights under the Fourth Amendment, as made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment. Reasoning: The police without a warrant or probable cause removed a subject from his home and transported him to the police station, where he was not free to go, although he was there briefly for questioning, In addition fingerprinted him.
According to the Fourth Amendment, people have the right to be secure in their private property, and may only be searched with probable cause. However, in a recent case, this right was violated by the government. An Oregon citizen, with the initials of DLK, was suspected of growing marijuana in his home. The federal government used a thermal imager to scan his home, and were later given a warrant to physically search his home. However, many remain divided over whether or not this scan was constitutional, as there was no warrant at the time of the scan.
Several exceptions to the Fourth amendment have been made over the past several decades, with some being understandable and others being questionable. Consenting to a search results in not needing a warrant, though this poses many exceptions and complications, i.e. the scope of the consent given, whether consent is voluntarily specified, or whether a person has the right to consent to a search of another's property. Another understandable exception is the “plain view” doctrine, where an officer (acting in legal presence) can seize plain view objects. The stipulation to this is that the officer must have had probable clause that the objects seized are contraband. Exigent circumstances, where it would be harmful or impractical to obtain a warrant
Hello, my name is Miranda Gidlof, and I am 38 years old. I am a mom to five great kids, ranging from 4 years old to 21 years old. I have worked in both child care and in home health. I love caring for people and helping them. I made a choice to return to school after 20 years because I wanted to open up myself to more job options.
1.History of Carmen Miranda This section will lead you through Carmen Miranda's history. A well-known singer, actress, and dancer of Portuguese and Brazilian descent who rose to the position of highest-paid woman in America in the 1930s and 1940s. She was born in 1909 in Portugal, but her family relocated to Brazil when she was very young. She began singing at a young age to help her family.
1. Biography of Carmen Miranda Carmen Miranda was born in Portugal in 1909 and her family moved to Brazil when she was very young and grew up in Rio de Janeiro. She began performing as a teenager in local nightclubs in the 1920s to support her family. By the 1930s, her popularity had begun to rise in Brazil and spread to other Latin American countries. Carmen Miranda's amazing career began when a Broadway producer recognised her talent and invited her to the United States to star in "Streets of Paris" in 1939 (West, J. & West, D. 1996).
Miranda July, an independent film maker, was rated NO.1 in “25 New Face of Indie Film” of Filmmaker Magazine in 2004. Her first three short features were The Amateurist (1998), Nest of Tens (2000, and Getting Stronger Every Day (2001). July’s first feature movie was Me and You and Everyone We Know (2005), telling a story that “A lonely shoe salesman and an eccentric performance artist struggle to connect in this unique take on contemporary life.” The film was widely commended and “won the Camera d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival”. The she directed The Future (2011), which “was nominated for the Golden Bear at the 61st Berlin International Film Festival”.
To begin, we need to understand the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment was created to prevent the government from breaching into our homes and convicting us of crimes based on evidence they discover within our homes. It was vital to state unreasonable searches in the constitution, and an unreasonable search is a search done without
Miranda, I like your point that any type of plagiarism is thought of as just as severe as another. Regardless of the intent, it still comes down to that it is the taking of someone else 's work and passing it off as your own. I feel that sometimes it does happen truly unintentionally. No matter how it came about, though, it basically is thought of as a theft. I agree that the Washington Post reporter handled the situation in a good way by admitting her wrongdoing and apologizing for it.
Although some people think that the Fourth Amendment can be used as an excuse to hide drugs or weapons from the police when they have alleged reasons that what you are doing so is illegal. Now that I have done lot’s of research on the Fourth Amendment I understand that it has had a much larger effect than just protecting U.S. citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The writs of assistance showed the colonists they needed a government that had valid reasons to search them or seize their property. Once the colonists had their own government, the ratified the Fourth Amendment to give themselves these protections. Without the Fourth Amendment today there would be much more concern about police biased and prejudice.