Case Study: The Urinary Stone Disease

Chapter One
Introduction
The Urolithiasis is an increasing illness due to the modification in nutritional behavior and in the general life style. Urolithiasis is identify by the repeated clinical symptom and probable produce of organic injure of the renal and of the urinary system in addition to the possible raise in systemic blood pressure. furthermore, numerous require for medical cure and persistent urological management lead to adverse effects of these procedures . though, previously recognized they can be treated more specifically having an effect on the stone's formation development. Because of that, avoidance of another stone in person, and in particular cysabtable, may be clinically essential (Menditto et. al. 2009).
Stone disease

Urinary stone disease remains to take an central position in each day urological procedures. The intermediate lifetime possibility of stone development has been notify between 5-10%. Reappearance of stone disease is a usual dilemma consist all kinds of stones and subsequently an significant component of the health care of Urolithiasis patients (Türk 2007 ). It has been appreciate that over 10% of men and 5% of women in the United States will experience renal stone at various instance throughout their lifetime (1, 2). These numbers would be somewhat elevated when the stones develop at any another place of the urinary system. if stones that form in other parts of the urinary tract were included. While not often lead to death, stone disease contributes to a significant health problems. As well as to the discomfort and distress an sharp stone episodes, management incurs expensive costs, and further costs because of time wasted from job, as many persons are experienced disease throughout their working time (Margaret at. al.

and provide counseling on health promotion and maintenance, stressing the importance of follow up care to evaluate causes of stone formation in an effort to prevent future recurrences (Colella et.al 2005).
Importance of the study
The prevalence of Urinary stones disease is estimated to be 1–5% worldwide. It is the third most usually encountered cases in urology clinics after urinary tract infection and prostate diseases (Ramello. at.el 2000).
Life-time risk of Urolithiasis varies from 1-5% in Asia, 5-9% Europe, 10-15% USA and 20-25% middle-east; lowest prevalence is reported from Greenland and Japan (Ngo & Assimos 2007 ).
The situation is not unlikely to be similar in various geographical regions worldwide making it alarming enough to lay more stress on preventive aspect of Urolithiasis (Bartoletti.et.al.2007).
The overall probability of forming stones differs in various parts of the world: 1–5% in Asia, 5–9% in Europe, 13% in North America, 20% in Saudi Arabia (Ramello et.al 2000